Gordon Stein, CFO of CleanTech Lithium, explains why CTL acquired the 23 Laguna Verde licenses. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Quady so if you research vaccines and decide they’re safe and have them im happy with that
Why then do you want to force me to agree with you or face apartheid from society? Surely if you’re safe you’re safe?
Similarly if you want green energy and electric car beciase you believe a certain scam that I don’t then you do your thing and let me do mine? Why must you mandate I can’t have cheap coal/oil/gas and drive a six litre Bentley?
Surely we all make our own choices in life based on our beliefs? I’m not trying to ban mRNA vaccines, you shouldn’t try and mandate them
Again Slug you have found out to be lying.
Would you care to publish a peer reviewed article that shows millions of autopsies have been done.
You can't because it's fake.
On these figures women should stop taking the contraceptive pill as many more people die from an adverse reaction.
This is why we peer review science, to stop the conspiracy and make sure it stands up to scrutiny.
Mathersfinger you are gullible, we know Slug is stupid.
Here is the scientific evidence posted below.
Try reading it.
https://www.ukri.org/news-and-events/tackling-the-impact-of-covid-19/vaccines-and-treatments/studying-the-link-between-covid-19-vaccines-and-rare-blood-clots/
Quady stop hiding behind your peer review link defence
Bridgen aired a comment from one of his constituents about how lethal the covid vaccines could be. Instead of launching an immediate investigation into whether they were safe, part members turned on Bridgen to silence and cancel him
What are they hiding? It’s blindingly obvious if you open your eyes. For heavens sake don’t take any more of that mRNA junk without researching it
No Quady you’re not gullible, just ignorant. Andrew Brigade was broadcast on tv, Dr John Campbell recorded it for all to see, this was in front of a select committee. What do you need to open your eyes, anyway, it’s out there if you look, but you know it all already don’t you.
Atb
Quady this was something I snapshotted hours after the veritas expose on Jordan Walker came out. I saw google scrubbing the internet before my eyes
This is what they do
https://ibb.co/Cs85Hgb
Mathersfinger I am just not guillable.
You seem to have a problem with fact checking.
Why not provide proper evidence, either a peer reviewed paper by anyone, that supports these arguments and stand up to scrutiny.
The reason you cannot is that it doesn't stand up to scrutiny.
This is so simple why are you putting up links to this stuff.
Put up links to the peer reviewed science that has been scrutinised.
That is your argument/answer is it, it was televised so don’t talk rubbish, your denial of what is happening is ignorance. You are blinded by your I’m always right argument, when you don’t an answer, you then say rubbish where’s the papers to back it up.
Dr John Campbell, your answer to that video about new pathology and the papers published? You my friend are very ignorant, I can see why many think ill of you, you cannot see further than the end of your telescope
Atb
Slug just when I think you cannot be more unintelligent you prove me wrong.
He lost the whip for possibly causing panic without fact checking first
Have you listened to Bridgen on anything.
He is not smart.
This is utter rubbish.
Let this guy provide a proper peer reviewed paper.
You know something serious scientists do, and see if it stands up to scrutiny.
Otherwise nobody can take it seriously.
Unchecked science is not science.
now get it right quady, he lost the whip for quoting somebody else (a cardiologist) who said “this is the biggest crime against humanity since the holocaust”
han**** turned on him and he was banished for “dangerous comments”
you see it yet?? even question the holy trinity of covid, climate and diversity and you are turned upon and closed down
this happened in germany in the late thirties too. it is terrifying for those who are awake to it
Andrew Bridgen was a conservative MP who lost the whip for lying.
Have heard him many times.
He is talking rubbish.
You find nutters everywhere.
Why is it no one can post a mainstream article supporting their views, and they can only find nutters to support them.
Now try finding some evidence.
You know real evidence.
I’ll put that into basic maths for you stack
One U.K. growth every year
So by 2030, if the U.K. got to net zero China would have replaced
2024 1
2025 another 1
…..
2030 another 1
7 U.K. worth extra for the one U.K. we dropped to her zero
But we’re heading for net zero by 2050
By then 27 more U.K. worth of emissions will be flying out of China
If it’s an “emergency” why aren’t they going to zero far far faster than we are?
You’d have to be lunatic not to spot why
Come on stack, why is the rest of the world not remotely interested or concerned about cO2 emissions?
And why if it truly is a disaster waiting to happen are we letting China grow at the rate of one U.K. every single year why we impoverish ourselves to do something negligible?
How does that stack up? 🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪
Stop dodging start answering
mathers, quady won’t watch the campbell video he will utter some garbage about “not peer reviewed”
even though he understands nothing himself
but campbell perfectly describes what is happening in the autopsies of people who have taken this ****. i’d be very worried if i had been stupid enough to take a novel vaccine rushed out to market in an order of magnitude less time than is normally the case for a new vaccine
especially so if one of those vaccine manufacturers was a minnow that bill gates pumped tens of
millions into in 2019 given his desire to depopulate the world
Sp that's another embarrassing defeat for slug.
The consensus is real, the methodology for measuring is sound and when given the opportunity to critique it, he resorts to nonsense.
6-0?
I’ve presented many arguments why it’s a load of rubbish but the most important of which is there’s never been proven a link between increase in co2 ppm and “global temperature” (whatever that is)
Most of the world isn’t remotely fussed which makes any effort the U.K. makes utterly irrelevant even if it were true
It is purely a political scam being pushed by people who want power over us. It’s Crystal clear to anybody with anything between their ears. Sadly that excludes morons like you
Quady. After waking again to your almost maniacal post after post after post, day after day after day after day, covering the same subjects, do you not think, it maybe time to have a little break,
And give other members a rest from you and your obsession with never being wrong.
You've even woken aquinaga to start his parrot like chipping in.
And bearing in mind the above. I would be curious as to why you feel the need to tell us you and adikt have a lot in common.
How do you feel adikt, being told you have a lot in common with quady
Nice try, but back to the issue you raised about climate consensus.
How would you improve the most recent methodology for measuring scientific consensus around climate change? Your claims are poorly reasoned (that's generous), but you have an opportunity to demonstrate some intelligence here. The floor is yours: we will wait.
Come on stack you’re not that thick 🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪
If this is truly a climate alarm; why isn’t the west waging war on China to force them to stop their 33% contribution to CO2 emissions from man to atmosphere?
If the world is done in ten years, why are we sitting back and watching chinas emissions grow at the rate of one U.K. worth every single year?
Why isn’t China bothered? Why is no developing nation bothered?
You have to be absolutely thick to see that it’s not a load of rubbish designed to push a different agenda
Sadly, you are thick
Quady,
Here’s video of Andrew Bridgen, well worth watching
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ej5Se4gMRA
Atb
How would you improve Mark Lynas's methodology from 2021, Slug?
We're listening 🤣
This is DR John Campbell who has been on the Covid case for some time, here is one video, after watching this, check out the interviews with embalmers and many other learned people from around the world.
Also he has videos of Andrew Bridgeden I think is the name, an MP who brought up this problem in parliament and has been sent to Coventry so to speak, however, he did not let this go, see how many start to stand by him after more data is released
There are papers to back up what has been said
This will open your eyes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kEE5OfiVS7o
Atb
“Slug you are screwy show me a link on millions of autopsies.”
Millions of spike proteins lodged in organs. PER autopsy
Learn to read
It’s been debunked all over the internet. The story goes that 97% of climate scientists agree with AGM. This claim came from John Cooke et Al (2013) and is quoted by eco loons constantly
11,994 climate papers were surveyed
66.4% (7,930) expressed no opinion
So they threw these out of the window
Of the remainder, 3% (118) rejected global warming
Therefore (according to this bullocks) 97% of papers with an opinion (that bit gets left out) support global warming
But that was a shameful mistruth because of the remaining papers only 2,910 (24%) supported global warming
Ie there has been some warming
But digging deeper only 8% (986) endorses anthropogenic global warming (ie it’s our fault)
And only 0.5% (64 papers) explicitly supported the IPCC version of AGW
So when we say that 97% of scientists agree with the IPCC AGW it turns out the truth is 0.5% do
And that my friend is how propaganda is used to fool idiots