We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
I received an e-mail just after Christmas from a Sean Tufford at Solg. Can anyone confirm if they received a similar e-mail or have been able to verify that he does work for Solg? I have looked on their website, Companies House and LinkedIn but not found him yet.
BBG, you're quite right, but I object to being misrepresented and subjected to his lies.
The next election will be a good one to lose...
Labour and SNP royally stuffed...unable to deliver their programmes...
But dont rule out a Labour led coalition...
Then they'll be out of office for another 12 years...
Addicknt, please stop communicating with the idiot.
Grrrr.. every single trade after 8.05 is an Autobot...!
Immediately jumped on hhhmmmppphhhhh!
Ah well our time will come
Big spread 10.10/10.52
Nal,
1) re Tribunal. I made absolutely no reference to a link between the news flow and the tribunal. It's just your fevered imagination.
2) Where did I say I have knowledge of what's going on? Evidence please.
I think I've come up with a solution to your comprehension issues: A while back you told us you and your family sit around your computer and have a good old laugh at what people post on here. (I'll put to one side just how bloody weird that is. Has it not occurred to you they might be laughing at you? Perhaps when they get in the car to drive home they wonder how long it'll be before they have to find a care home for you...somewhere deep in the Outback so they don't have to visit you every Sunday) Anyway, perhaps you could ask one of your grandchildren to sit with you and read out the posts with helpful explanations of what they actually mean? I'm sure life would become more agreeable for you.
Let's hope Bob. Let's hope.
Get some agreements signed, and then who knows.
Back above GGP’s price!!!! 2024 if so exciting. 20p by April imo
Eloro. When I first stared posting, I tried to engage, clearly stating I expected to make a modest profit, but there were pitfuls ahead.
The pack then the same as with you didn't mind the modest profit posts, but couldn't countenance the pitfall posts.
Unfortunately for them, there inability and inexperience to see these pitfalls coming, has cost many of them dearly.
There's not one denier on here who never topped up all the way to 50p. So when they boast of buying at 1p or whatever. It means nothing.there op to there necks.
That's when the fantasy and lies kick in. It's like a comfort blanket to the.
Hence the vitriol.
Wow. How weird is that.
Now all of a sudden adikt doesn't have me filtered.
And not only that, the sulker has now got me on filter but has responded to 26 of my last 28 posts.
Adikt, you did dismiss scotty clearly stating that he hoped for signatures, and not getting them, as
Almost irrelevant, he should not of misled.
My ref to bhp, is that with no news you say nobody knows what's going on.
Yet in the same breath, with no solg believable news, you tell us you know things are going on in the background, with not one scrap of tangible evidence to back it up.
You also alluded to the fact solg have to be careful because of the tribunal.
And the cash raise or share sale is imminent. There's 5 months between now and June. These things are not sorted overnight, I would like to think Caldwell is on the case now.
Bozi, your post regarding the election is pretty much spot on. Going to have to vote while pinching my noise!
I remember the 70s after labour and that was bad but now the country is broken on so many fronts. Labour spending all the money early 2000s then covid and add in the incompetence of the recent tories.
Trouble is labour don’t have the answers. It’s going to have to be someone with much more bold ideas than the current leaders we have to get us back on track.
Addicknt he’s (nal) simply not worth engaging with.
A few others posters are getting almost as bad. I wonder how they get through real life like that. HNY
Nal, it may come as a surprise to you, but I agree with your cash point, although you may recall what Sangha implied when he said we won't need to raise any more money. However, the reason I originally referred to it was because Eloro was portraying the issue as being of immediate concern. It isn't.
Nowhere did I suggest that news flow has stopped because of the tribunal. Your observation is yet another example of you being unable to understand what people actually say.
Your comment about BHP is simply meaningless.
I did not dismiss the lack of signed agreements as being irrelevant and if you'd read what I said you'd have understood that I said I too would have preferred to have the IPA signed asap.
Your latest post highlights precisely your problem - you don't read and comprehend what people actually say. You simply apply your own prejudice to your interpretation and then accuse others of being rampers, etc, etc. I'm afraid that reflects on you, not others.
p.s. I did have you filtered - you were the only one - but I don't like doing it, so I unfiltered you.
No problem NAL, let them filter away. The true nature of this BB is clear for all to see. When I post positives, they shower me with praise. But when I post an honest observation, they are up in arms! Clearly, only ramping and rampers are tolerated here. We can post any opinion so long as it's ramping. Reminds me of Wells' 1984.
BBg, you've not filtered eloro, nobody filters anybody on here.
In fact since I ridiculed your claim to live in aus, you've posted I'm filtered about 27 times,
Yet like adikt and the sulker respond to my posts.
You either all log on, and miraculously spot my post, as if anyone logs of.
Or in adikts case just happens to have a peep out of curiosity to see what I'm posting.
By coincidence, just after I question his company director and nuclear scientist neighbour, name dropping to prove his point.
It's small wonder your a bit of a laughing stock
Adikt. I read with interest your 3 wise monkeys responce to eloro.
Just a couple of points I would like you to clarify.
We know solg are due to run out of money in June.
But do you not think eloro has a point that a cash raise or share sale will happen long before the money runs out.
You state that the news flow has stopped because of the tribunal case.
The news flow stopped long before that. In fact it coincided with scotty boy taking over.
You also state that nobody knows what bhp are doing
I find that strange, as you and others on here seem to know what solg are doing.
You dismiss the lack of any movement on signatures as almost meaningless. But Caldwell did allude to it being imminent, and the longer it is goes is a real worry.
And you dismiss take over talk as BB chatter.
Really, it's not BB chatter on here, it's gospel.
The embarrassed slug leaves to create another account. Don't worry- he's always easy to spot with his tired GB news talking points. Still, be nice to have a break from the casual r***sm and conspiracy theories.
Never got that data, did we? So forgive me if I don't place too much stock in his predictions here. No way an opening bid drops at 40p, mostly because we won't see a re-rate into the 20s.
Very insightful skint..
🙄
Aquinaga, 25 out of 27. Still sulking.
Aquinaga, 24.out of 26. Still sulking
It's not what I want DBW. For what it's worth, I want to see a house of all parties that drives the hardest bargain and delivers as well as it can for the UK, a house that rids itself of self-interest and substandard public service levels.
It's not so much about party politics for me but I'll freely admit that Starmer has more than his share of faults. He's going to be inheriting the keys to a pretty broken country and I don't envy the job he'll have to do to try and forge some progress.
For some ardent tories I expect he'll show an improvement on the recent governments and that's in spite of the fact he'll not get everything right.
But personally speaking, this election ought to put to bed an episode that started with the fairly meagre mismanagement of Cameron and Osborne and developed into the rudderless wandering of May before progressing to the devious sack that was Boris.
More than anything, I wish the British people would see frauds for what they are. Making I'm asking for too much there though...
That's why he's filtered...
Hi Bozi
I’m sure the conservatives will lose the next election but if you want to see the back of the tories for a generation then you’re clearly betting against Starmer too …… unless of course you consider him a socialist which he clearly isn’t?