George Frangeskides, Chairman at ALBA, explains why the Pilbara Lithium option ‘was too good to miss’. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
"the fourth significant deal to close in three weeks. "
Funny, what happened three weeks ago?
Brilliant, ****ging off IES cos it was really a REDT deal!
Poor thing, are we not sufficiently recognising your genius? Well, maybe its because its hard to see through the redundant, flaccid commentary. The 'debate' was over whether orders were being held up to see if the 'greener' joe biden won and I said that was ridiculous/irrelevant. And again, not that it matters in the slightest, but I would rather 'promote' every jacked-up, ignorant, psuedo-intellectual fur ball you've ever coughed up on this message board, than utter a single positive thought about that diseased life form that's just been ejected from the White House. So there's that. Oh, and I almost forgot, Larry and Matt say hey.....
ha! I told you the first time and you changed the subject. No one was holding up anything, waiting to see if joe would win, though his win combined with a republican senate has certainly energised stock markets worldwide. Covid, and the recession, and covid, and the reality that orders always take longer to close than expectation, and covid , and the recession and....that's what has slowed things down if they have been slowed down at all. period. Biden's win makes the world a better place for a while anyway and that's certainly something to celebrate. And of course in 2 years, when he can finally get around to an infrastructure bill, green names will be bought and IES might well benefit, but by that time we'll be $1B company and what will have gotten us there will have nothing to do with Joe and everything to do with deals like this morning's validating and then accelerating the uptake of vanadium flow as a permanent part of the world's energy storage solution suite.
"bc its irrelevant."
You express yourself so curtly, it's difficult to understand what you mean, let alone have a discussion. With a major election imminent, it stood to reason that projects might be delayed for the reasons I have given, can you explain please why you took the opposite view? If I was right, then any delayed contracts might well be ready for signing soon.
Mate, I'm a professional
I have to say that when it comes to ****ging each other off, the quality of ****ging is far superior on this board compared to others. Not even any spelling mistakes.
and, right on schedule, comes a bookend inanity from the brother from another mother, lest he be outdone in the senile uncle stakes
did you go away and get dumber and then were so excited, you had to come back today in order to show us? when have I ever - in any forum real or imagined - expressed so much as a nostril hair of pro-trump sentiment?? But even more importantly, what possible difference does it make to anything anyway? what a numpty. Blah, if you want to look for relevance for Invinity's share price performance related to politics, focus on the state level if you must.
????
bc its irrelevant.
" What I was deeming irrelevant was the idea that the coming election has had any impact on 'delay' decisions by IES management on 'alleged' deals, or whatever your point was. "
I see, so you were referring to the secondary point I made rather than the main point, but didn't say so. The afterthought was suggesting that expectation of an imminent change in administration might account for customers delaying signing deals, for the obvious reasons of uncertainty over tax changes and changes to other regulations and incentives affecting their own finances. If that was what you curtly dismissed as "irrelevant", as you now claim, any particular reason for that?
Biden , unfortunately, is not a 'technical' guy , and it can be seen from campaign advertising, and even debating ( not with Trump), that he is not a clear, concise thinker. On the other side, there is a intellectually, morally, financially corrupt liar 'extrodinaire', who has ambushed the Republican Party, which may take a decade to recover. It will be interesting to see, when most of the Trump family is behind bars, how many of his 'faithful' Senate followers will say 'I had no idea'. Trump will still have about 40% of Americans praising him, these are, in the main, people who think that Mankind has been on the earth for 10,500 years, and are racists. Hopefully, the ballot box will rid America of the Republican Senate majority.
It is obviously important that a Democratic Govt, make good on their pledges for 'green energy', but to ensure a continuation of this Govt., Biden must keep the electorate 'financially' happy. USA debt is a major obstacle. Renewables and energy storage are vital to his plans, but I hope that he embraces H2 FC technology for 'high initial cost' transportation modes, such as HGV's, rail, ships and aircraft. H2FC, at moment, are too expensive to dent the BEV market, which still relies on power from the grid, which generates pollutants. But, it will be exciting times for IES. GL to all investors.
I'll see your bullish general sector piece where IES isn't mentioned, Pinecone, and raise you another article where IES isn't mentioned, but is yugely bullish on V specifically as the 'Valyrian Steel of the Energy Transition' : https://www.iisd.org/articles/vanadium-valyrian-steel-energy-transition
Don’t know why this appeared............ but even if we are not mentioned, it keeps the conversations flowing!
https://www.greentechmedia.com/amp/article/so-what-exactly-is-long-duration-storage-explained
Fingers crossed for news.........soon!
PC
Simple. Because I wasn't referring to US energy policy and how it might evolve under Biden, which even without the recent press backing up the prospects, was always going to be self-evidently a positive development from the current awful administration and which I am certainly among many who feel it can and will mean an even more exciting environment for alt energy in many forms. What I was deeming irrelevant was the idea that the coming election has had any impact on 'delay' decisions by IES management on 'alleged' deals, or whatever your point was. Firstly I reject the premise that any announcements can or would be intentionally 'delayed' in the first place, but even if they could/would be, it wouldn't have anything to do with the election cycle. Ergo, irrelevant.
Mentions batteries around 9:07. When I suggested Biden's energy policy was important for IES in late September you said "Sorry, no. Not a bad thought, but that is irrelevant", bluerill, but now you seem to be suggesting it IS relevant after all. What changed your mind?
There seems a reasonable chance the Dems will gain control of the Senate, allowing the budgetary approvals Biden will need. Apart from the actual spending, there will be a whole change in attitude including appointment of an EPA director who actually cares about the environment (current one is a coal lobbyist), and re-engagement with the international community. To my mind it all adds up to more demand and more urgency in the general marketplace for IES products.
A friendly interview to be sure, but Joe Biden does not do too many podcasts where he has a chance to answer detailed policy questions in long-form. Not a surprise perhaps, but a little before halfway, he confirms that storage is absolutely front-of-mind for the - please God - soon-to-be future president of the US and the '$800B federal contract fund' his White House will control. Go Joe.....https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C6u1uKznCYw