Gordon Stein, CFO of CleanTech Lithium, explains why CTL acquired the 23 Laguna Verde licenses. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Seems to be a lot of people with dislegsy.., dislleksi.. dyselss.., trouble spelling
:-)
TomE, lol I should read back more often before hitting send , between predictive text and my dyslexia a keyboard is not my friend, I do apologise
Bloggs, “miss interpreted “ really!
Hydrogen, I think you miss interpreted me, I wasn't saying you don't tell the truth I was referring to all the conflicting info you get online, hard to know what is truth and what is fiction at times.
Great joe, Always best to dyor and then do some more until you can find the correct answer
1 Hargreaves Lansdown 22%
2 Interactive Investors 11.19
3 Halifax 7.23
5 AJ Bell 3.77
6 Barclays 3.73
9 HSBC 2.19
11 Jarvis 1.82
12 IG 1.79
These are all nominee accounts there are loads more plus private individuals
Midnight , I have just been googling what is the institutional ownership of GGP shares and I find figures ranging from around 9% - 80%, who is telling the truth
Midnight, thanks for that but I do already have that one printed off, the report I saw also included institutions that are not investment funds. I will try and find it again
Just for you Joe
https://www.morningstar.com/stocks/xlon/ggp/ownership
Speedy I have not seen the register but reports that were said to have come from the register stated the public share was 45.4%, but as I say I have nit seen that for myself, think I saw on an AJ Bell report
My biggest fan 003 and a tird thinks I’ve got it wrong .
The plan to the west decline is perfectly as I’ve described it, the decline from the top of the ore is spiralling downwards just as I said.
You are the most bitter and twisted poster I’ve ever come across you need help mate, keep taking the tablets
Bamps, can't find my notes on that but from memory H&L were by far the biggest
Hi JB you’ve made the same mistake that GDXJ made last year when Hydro put them right.
H&L, interactive, and loads of others are PI nominee accounts all big holders
Hi Joe. I have not checked the share holder register but i thought there was a majority PI holding circa 85%. ATB Speedy
Hi Tymers. I read your posts with interest and respect your level of knowledge in this space. My only beef is the tone of your posts and the constant petty oneupmanship arguments. Must admit though some of the spats are quite entertaining. ATB Speedy
Tymers, General public share is 45.4% while institutions have49.4% what would you have it it and why
Speedy. With respect you as no doubt Hydro have not digested any if my previous calculations or statements. My comment has always valued based on data available approx 3 to 3 5 billion for FGO fir Hav akobe thus 88p inc approx 100 million other tenements. I have also stated many times GGP needs to move away from retail investor which requires the Rubber Stamp starting with PFS. I have also stated it will take 18 to 24 months for true value. But will not applaud someone who quite frankly would be better placed at the Appolo as a complete comedian.
You cant kid a kidder Hydro
Thx Bamps .. knew I could rely on you for a simplified version.
It’s not a good feeling to see our resident motorway engineer/wannabe geologist accepting he was wrong but kudos for doing so!
Hi Tymers. Not wanting to get into a dikc swinging contest but your statement "the rest is just noise" is blatantly wrong. So you are stating there is no more value apart from what is in the PFS. You know that is incorrect and so do most that have done their DD. How do you keep coming up with 88p if that is what you really believe. Your method of posting is arrogant. For the sake of a peaceful BB please reign it in, please also take note Hydro and stop the stupid bickering. What we all need is useful, actionable info. ATB Speedy
Think you are being a bit harsh. Final Scally assays were received by GGP on the 19th April. Would have taken the team several months at least to take this data and remodel and they were back drilling Scally wag by the 16th August...... less than 4 months.
SD has already outlined their program for 100% owned tenements in 2022 (Ernest Giles etc). Seems like they have plenty going on to me.
Hi Lenz
The figures are all a mixture
Inferred last Dec 52m tons was rounded up
Sulphides include 18m tons of which 3.6m tons are not included in the Iindicated =14.4m actual
Indicated 14m tons is rounded down so 1.6m oz is rounded down
37m tons not included rounded down
Hannams have 52m - 37m = 15m tons and then worked out 1.9m oz
We have 1.6m oz rounded down.
The 9 year life span in the PFS I believe contains the 3.6m tons of sulphides not included in the Indicated.
That’s 9 years x 2m tons = 18m tons
That is 14.4mt + 3.6mt
Hannams have used there own modelling to get to 28.1mt for 11 years life of mine for 3mt pa , some of the inferred breccia has been included in this forward looking production.
The mining plan no longer shows a sub level caving scenario and just sub level open stoping and paste backfilling.
This has a tremendous effect on the capital cost of this initial plan . They’re modelling shows $151m of cost structure rising to $381m for this new plan, they’re new modelling forecasts costs of $476m.
Hannams and Berenberg have reduced their price targets as a consequence of the mining plan changes.
The 3mt pa over 11m years is the figure being worked on for the BFS.
Now we still have 37mt of breccia in the inferred 0.6mt is being added to the indicated to enable the sulphides to be stoped and are included in phase 1.
This is what is likely to be added to the indicated and may alter the mine plan and reduce costs in the next update.
Stoping all the way down seems an expensive option, I am hoping for a change back to SLC but it doesn’t look that way at the moment especially with the Dyke sloping downwards to the SE.
Am I disappointed in the plan well yes I am at the moment.
I can’t see the high grade ore being picked out without the breccia.
Early days though but a disappointing initial outcome
Juri JV aside , how many holes have we drilled since the original phase 1 Scallywag outing - nowhere near enough is my point - with Havieron a certainty time to book in a more aggressive exploration program and announce it to the market - they have the in house geology expertise to target deep under cover assets - it’s time to make the bold move in my opinion .
Hi daveri.
I am sure the rigs are booked..... by GGP and several other explorers.....remember this is one of the hottest areas for drilling which was my original point.