George Frangeskides, Chairman at ALBA, explains why the Pilbara Lithium option ‘was too good to miss’. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Do you not realise yet that everytime someone engages in discussion or replies to Irenekrapp she has a little win. Just by replying, regardless of the content, she/he has achieved exactly what he/she set out to do.
She/he doesn't even have any shares so should have nothing to gain personally by the constant negativity. Potentially being paid to get a response from people on here. Stop providing the fuel and attention that she/he needs to function.
It's not ROCKET science.
Looks Like Krapp has got it’s toolstring in a twist.
2020 Vision. - Nice one. Irene, pants down - her arse well and truly slapped. What was the whole point in her argument? It was simply a case of trying to envisage every worst-case scenario on the drill. 2020 Vision. Glad you were able to show your superior knowledge.
IreneKrapp
I would have thought my point is obvious, bpc, or any operator for that fact will not spend weeks fishing a stuck wireline toolstring in a ss well given the costs involved. It’s simple economics. The days of LIH charges for lost wireline toolstrings/BHA’s amounting to millions is long gone.
I’m not actually sure what your point is other than scaremongering about the costs involved in fishing/losing a wireline toolstring.
I know how to fish stuck wireline tool strings, and any BHA or completion for that matter. As long as the operator can demonstrate they’ve made a “best endeavour” to recover the toolstring it can be left. If a sidetrack was required a KOP would be set at an appropriate depth. If the toolstring was stuck close to the casing shoe a whipstock could be set inside the casing to perform the sidetrack.
To summarise, for your benefit
1. Operators are not required to fish wireline toolstrings, just demonstrate “best endeavours” to make a recovery
2. Wireline tool strings will not cost, I quote yourself “millions”
3. No operator would spend weeks fishing in an exploration well, regardless what is stuck.
Should you have any further questions or require any further clarification please do not hesitate to ask!
Ha ha , you’re brilliant.
I think you know from your limited knowledge you have to make “best endeavours” to recover radioactive sources. That is down to interpretation and amounts to a day or two at best. It’s easy to argue that a wireline tool string is unrecoverable in OH.
I’m happy to discuss this all night if you wish!!!!!!!
I very much doubt that there would be a long protracted fishing job to recover a wireline tool string in any exploration well let alone P-1. Pull the week link, run in and set a cement plug on top and that would be it!
Awwww Irene I’m getting excited. Why? Because I can see you are getting wound up and your posts are more frequent. That must mean one thing and one thing only...... bpc is about to shoot up and you don’t like it because that’s not a match maker for your short position. Love it.
Utter semantics
Baker Hughes or Halliburton perhaps
Who are on the BPC drill team in its widest sense offering all required services
You don't know, as you don't know BPC - your just selling your CERP deramp agenda as best you can
as to costs - i didn't say it wasn't expensive, but that alternate funds exist to draw down from, a point you choose to ignore
Irene...why would you bother?YOU are not invested!!!
Irene dear, please translate your last post into English, Greek, Latin, Arabic, ancient Hebrew or Australian.
Thank you. Speak tomorrow as almost my bed time where I live.
Starchild
Irene
Yes, we do understand contingency required, a few points
There funds are based on what they have now - more is identified including CLN as required
their estimated P#1 costs are $20m -$25m with $5m contingency
Schlumberger are not on the drill team, keep up
Irene, our naughty BPC daily de-ramping tigress: As usual I have no idea what your latest somewhat incoherent posts were about other than they appeared somewhat flirtatious.
You keep referring to ‘holes’, my ‘pecker’, ‘twitching’, and ‘spudding’ and sometimes appear to use the term ‘starfish’ as a euphemism for my ‘drill-bit’. This is irritating as I’m happily married therefore have no intention to have you as my future ex-wife. Frankly, without wishing to cause you sadness, the CoS of this unlikely betrothal, from today until I leave this world, is around minus 100%.
Changing the subject, may I suggest you remove your shorts ASAP. I imagine they are massive based on your frequent anti-BPC rhetoric to protect your CFDs. I remain permanently ‘long’ in anticipation and extremely excited at this imminent spudding……….. for Percy-1 and Saffron-2.
Respectfully and fondly,
Starchild (AKA ‘Starfish’)
https://www.lse.co.uk/profiles/starchild/
'Bottom' line: convictions strong BUY especially as Eytan will be speaking tomorrow.
Haway Harry man. !! I thought you were gonna be in good fettle.
I think we all expected a better update than we received Thursday - we know that settled a few nerves anyway, but YES it would be nice to learn more - NO it would not cause a tank if nothing in the morning.
Should there be any surprises in the presentation - it will do good or bad - but I do not see any tanking going on.
Stay safe all - 57 days until 15th December. Add another 10 for that other thing we know about. I have to say I am more excited about the earlier occasion of course. ;@)
Just need joined up writing, is it fully funded or not? Looks to me that it is, may be caveat in there to may go over budget, but if you nearly there with all the 3d stuff, all the work was done years ago it it's all politics now and always has been, plenty of money to be made here all about distribution of said wealth
Fast track and BPC are not common bedfellows.
With the possible exception of both CERP and Uruguay in recent months.
BPC outlined that Saffron field development needs $3m funds.
They have this now with $25m P#1 fully funded with $4m spare.
Fast track Saffron news tomorrow?