Our latest episode of the Investing Matters Podcast, featuring Janet Mui, award-winning investment industry commentator, has just been released. Listen here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East and have access to Premium Chat. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
We had a few of them working with us. My old boss referred to them as ‘Wikipedia engineers’. Still cleared £3k/week so they were doing something right.
I'm thinking someone who knows that the trial protocol is published on clinicaltrials.gov could write 95% of the expert opinion his lordship so generously supplies. The difficult bit would be adopting the tone linked to a pathological need to appear to the only opinion worth considering. Most of what is written seems tbe be his lordship telling his lordship what a clever boy he is. Mostly harmless except when he bursts his own bubble but getting it spectacularly wrong. Then the fantasy implodes on itself and rather than reflect and have any sort old self awareness, the Madam T****y alter ego appears, Spreadsheets the donkey is mounted and a trip to the butchers for an extra big helping of sausage is a must. Strange bloke but a interesting case study. Won't say too much because I think the condition feeds of attention and probably delays the individual seeking the help they need to calm the voices.
Anyway, you’re a troll. An exceptionally dull sea lion of a troll. An exceptionally dull calamitous trading sea lion of a troll.
No lies from me…
bitl, "Was Ophidian right or wrong?"
I don't know... I don't really care, that wasn't the point. I don't follow the technology like some do on this BB. (to me its pointless, the info is already out there and the only relevant bits will be when AVCT report the results.) So, (to me, imo), its makes no odds, the trial will still reveal the results when it reveals the results.
What has ruined this BB, is the very few in fact, that simply get off on being insulting to others even if they have to invent reasons that are downright lies to do so.
As I said and as well we all can, either filter or ignore, thats it. The name calling is stupid and juvenile and I guess at its darkest when you get into deliberately trying to shut people up, then cancel culture/censorship of a view for the sake that it does not chime with your own is getting a bit more serious in my book.
(Thats why I took a very dim view of MM, encouraging posters to report other people incl me with the aim to be banned, simply because of my views.)
coming from a stockholder of millions of shares it stank to high heaven of desperately trying to manipulate the SP itself. His argument should win the day, not his version of censorship.
I think I was not the only one to see that on a much more broader scale than this BB, as now his posts no longer have much, if any effect on the SP
Wyn - Ok.
Was Ophidian right or wrong?
It's a lovely day outside. Maybe everyone should go out, grab a beer and chill. Just my opinion.
bilt, I am consistent. I buy and sell frequently when I think the SP will move to my expectation.
The SP is not the same as the company. Nothing about the company itself changes until the results are released. in the meantime the SP can gyrate all over the place and there is potential to make money from that. So, If I think the SP is likely to go up I will say, and likewise If I think it will fall. That to me is not inconsistent.
I simply don't understand how still people cannot distance themselves from the SP and the company but hey ho.
Plus and not for nothing (given PL still deliberately lies about me, but only for his amusement, conceited prick that he is,) When is the last time I posted anything even by this BB's skewed rose tinted glasses that was "negative" about AVCT?
I have been buying for months now (with a bit of top slicing just to make a few bucks), and have only ever, ever stated that the cancer therapy is why I stay.
It was only my view that LFT was a bust and that I could see a cash raise coming sooner than later that caused all the vitriol that stays to this day . On the cash raise I have been wrong, on the LFT I , as it turned out was right, and backed MY reasoning with MY money and have done ok. (Actually quite a lot better than just ok).
You know, making money out of buying and selling stocks.
Given I think most on this BB manage their own portfolios of varying sizes and therefore probably "trade" a bit more then they care to admit., I don't quite see what crime it is to post about that on an investment BB.
Wyn - PL rarely posts on the board anymore. There’s nothing really to discuss. I bet he’s bored. I’ve retreated a bit myself for those reasons.
It’s all about consistency. You’re not consistent. Ophidian was wrong. Absolutely wrong. You chose (like the Star Wars fan the other day) to get involved and antagonise.
Hey Dacia, thought you weren’t a fan of posting things from over a year ago? What a hypocrite... I stand by what I said about China, it was a discussion about a zero covid policy. They’re still having lockdowns with the same policy so looks like I was right about it. NZ had a similar policy that was ultimately successful. The point was that the U.K. as an island could and should have done the same - I said get to get the army out very early on. But… if you preferred the policy that resulted in thousand of excess deaths by a govt partying in private, that’s up to you. I wasn’t wrong, it was an opinion, but if that’s all you’ve got… incidentally, some might call it cherry picking. Hope you’re not a hypocrite. Oh wait.
Meanwhile, you keep saying your trading record is great. I’ve also said you should start a thread in general and post your trades in advance. Prove what a god you are. So far the evidence suggests you’re only gifted at losing 95% of your cash. Several times. Oops. Dacia by name, Dacia by nature.
Anyway, you’re a troll. An exceptionally dull sea lion of a troll. An exceptionally dull calamitous trading sea lion of a troll.
exactly PL - you quoted the dictionary.
Did someone get out of the wrong side of bed this morning?
Or is the magic mirror in the hallway giving the wrong answer?
"Who is the most intelligent of the all?"
Don't eat those apples RD.
PL: " The board would be much better off without his attitude and clearly without twats like you - you’re simply a troll poster (with an absolutely atrocious trading record). "
" The board would be much better off without his attitude. .." in your opinion..., that's a fairly important caveat, don't you think, or perhaps you recognise arrogance being in fact, your main characteristic? You are never wrong are you.. Oh wait,...LFT, China and its accurate reporting .... (though to be fair your insistence on China being a paragon of honesty was as amusing as it was naive.)
As for my trading record.." Attrocious" you say, well it could be better, but I've done ok here. And thats the trouble for you. You harp on 3 stocks that have nothing to do with this BB, and yet the one stock that you have knowledge of that I have had good success on calling you always ignore, namely AVCT.
You cherry pick info to make false points and to discriminate me and therefore my views.
It can't influence me, because I know exactly what I do. So you can only through your deliberate deceit, be trying to deceive others on this BB.
Or your ego won't allow you to concede how blinkered and ultimately foolish you have been when you decided to wage your war of petty insults on someone who forecasted the likelyhood of the LFT commercially failing when the Stock was over 255p per share.
He couldn’t admit being wrong the other day.
He was also wrong about the half-life guff on Twitter.
‘monumentally stupid and that fact you didn't understand why what you were quoting showed your ignorance just makes it really funny.’
I quoted the dictionary you utter moron, that’s what was really funny. You were wrong and clearly can’t handle it. Grow up you freak of a man baby. And there you go again… toys out of the pram, ohhh woe is me, I’m not posting anymore, booo hooo, please gather around and beg me not to go. If you change your attitude, then one day you’ll be able to change the record. Look up humility in the dictionary when you finished learning what efficacy means. It’s ok to get things wrong, you’ll be ok sweet pea
Wow. His lordship seems to be in a dark place and lashing out for no need. Recent posts have been limited to his opinion with no need to have a pop at others and board been all the better for it.
Wonder why he wants to drag it back down and have everyone Neel before him. Look at me don't look at me. Attention seeking of a child.
I'll wait for the standard comments but really hoping someone with all his BTECs can come up with something new even if its not funny. Make my day.
Don’t bother. You’re a trader, hence the benefit is all yours.
" There wasn’t any reason at all for him to name me in his post, only he knows why he did that."
03 Aug 2022 17:40
monumentally stupid and that fact you didn't understand why what you were quoting showed your ignorance just makes it really funny.
I have spent hours slowly explaining things on here for the benefit of others certainly not myself and idiots like you try and be clever when clearly you are not it is simply wearing so I now save myself the bother
Ophidian - you’re a charlatan who is more readily exposed. Your ego can’t take any conversation you don’t direct.
I see Marty has you blocked on Twitter.
Dearest donkey riding oddball, I’ve never posted a single thing about the trial and any of the technicalities. I’ve only ever posted that I’m looking forward to the results and that ever day that passes is a good thing as it continues. Sorry to disappoint you, but I don’t overly care about the technical side of it, I leave that to others, I just enjoy reading about it. However, most posters manage to share their knowledge without needing to try to be smug, patronising or antagonistic, they don’t find a need to be an arrogant twat, they just enjoy sharing and discussing their research. Try getting off your donkey once in a while and not being a twat, you might find you like it.
Yawn, Dacia is here. Discussions are indeed difficult due to the personalities. That was exactly BITLs point, the donkey rider hasn’t ever managed a genuine conversation on here as his precious ego doesn’t allow him to concede when he gets things wrong. The board would be much better off without his attitude and clearly without twats like you - you’re simply a troll poster (with an absolutely atrocious trading record). I only ever respond when he’s being a twat, I can’t help it if that’s 99% of the time. There wasn’t any reason at all for him to name me in his post, only he knows why he did that. Well, other than he’s a twat, obviously.
it is simply impossible here to have a conversation about various scenarios because of the personalities who if you ignore the barbs and rudeness, show that the underlying view and need is to shutdown any other view.
The points ophidian raises today are shouted down with pointless previous references to posts that he made of over a year ago. (I am happy to admit I find his tone difficult at times and also have not agreed with all his analysis, however if I felt that strongly about it I would simply filter or ignore. Why do you think these other few never do that?)
For all of you that so enjoy rec'ing these posts at least be aware that you are part of the cancel culture that will not allow any other view to be aired other than their own.
History does not put you in very good company.
you parade your ignorance like a badge of honour. Humour me - try and give one rudimentary cogent explanation of either of the two points I made at 11:59. I'll even give you some Googling time - ask Rorkes if you need help- he's good on Google, but Wiki probably can't help you with this one you have to look a little deeper and actually understand things a bit
Thank you for the compliment. Otherwise, I simply correct.
Managed to understand what efficacy means yet? Still struggling to use a calendar? Any more price predictions? Any delicious sauce recommendations? Nope? Best trot off to get another filet o fish…
so still very good at the insults and extraordinarily poor at explanations, understanding or content then ?
Clip clop… hark as he trots off in to the distance, until next time when he does the same thing again… whilst in the meanwhile bleating on twatter about LSE and how much he hates it. What a twat.
but so much less often than others eh ? Clip Clop