Member Info for zumore

And yes I know he asked MrMagic but I looked at that RNS the other day so i knew where it was.

Briarbank this is RNS that talks about payments that RRR will need to pay if licences are renewed:. https://www.lse.co.uk/rns/RRR/progress-report-african-exploration-assets-5s1il4w8nfrg1yr.html

It say the $2.5 million cash will need to be paid within 3 months of licence renewal. So they were renewed on 2nd August 2020 so within 3 months would be by 2 November.
....
We can also be certain Andrew Bell would've made big promises to the Kenyan government to regain licences. So in my opinion little activity there would be unwise. So lots of money will be needed by RRR to advance the Kenyan asset.

Saying that even if RRR spend additional millions on advancing the Kenyan asset I still think it's highly likely that the Kenyan government will eventually take licences away again.

I wonder what psychiatrist are making of people who are terrified of the coronavirus?

I mean if a year ago someone was walking around in a facemask, they were recoiling in horror if you went near them, they were paranoid about contracting a virus that had little chance of killing them, no doubt they would've been gently eased into a straight jacket and carted off.

But now seeing someone who is paranoid with this irrational fear is normal. Governments around the world have scared millions sh"tless and now we have many millions of mentally ill paranoid people in the world.

I recall the time when Regency mines (now Corcel) wanted to bring greater attention to their Mambare nickel exploration asset. So they invested £400,000 in a Tesla car rental company called White car.

A few months previously Scott Kaintz had rented one of their cars for the day and then he gave a praising review on a website. So it was obviously his idea for Regency mines to invest £400,000 in this car rental company.

Most companies try to bring attention to an asset by doing exploration on it. Scott Kaintz and former chairman Andrew Bell combined brain power decided the best way to bring attention to Mambare was to invest in a car rental company.

Of course it goes without saying it was a disastrous £400,000 investment by Regency mines because the car rental company quickly went bust.
....
I look at a company like Horizonte minerals (HZM) they are relentlessly advancing their nickel projects. No excuses no sob stories about past downturns, they just relentlessly progress their projects. Big financial institutions take them serious and financially back them to bring their nickel projects to eventual production.

Then we come to joke companies like this one. Constantly flitting from one disastrous project to the next. Constant excuses. They last did any serious exploration at their nickel Mambare exploration asset around 2011-2012. Of course leaching directors. They are an utter joke of a company. And this price rise these past month or so is not based on the company doing well but because some ramper on twitter said he'd bite of his mini chopper if it didn't significantly rise by September. It's pathetic!

at the 2018 UK investor show:. https://m.youtube.com/watch?feature=emb_title&time_continue=4&v=BvrxeSURz2o

Around the 16 minutes mark some RGM investor starts asking questions about the disastrous US coal projects that RGM had invested in. Uncomfortable Scott makes numerous excuses.

Then around the 18 minute mark can't hack it Scott steps aside and the excuse making former chairman (with a face of thunder) Andrew Bell steps up onstage and he now starts to make excuses. He assures another disgruntled investor that this unnamed new coal project will be a winner this time because it had made profits 8 years in a row. Of course it ended being a disaster under RGM and their partners Legacy hill and that coal investment was written off within months.

Hard to hear but listening to the disgruntled investor he was telling Andrew that he other investors had no confidence in him. Just a few months later at the AGM, coincidentally just a day after RGM announced the Dempster Vanadium exploration investment, big shareholder Stephen Pearce and others told Bell to step down. Bear in mind even the announcement of the new Vanadium project didn't save the atrocious Bell.

Actually this post has got too long. I wasn't even meant to be posting about Bell.

Watch around the 16 minute mark. This is the unimpressive Scott Kaintz, the man who does the CRCL interviews. Now he's the CEO associated with Regency mines squalid past.

This Dempster exploration licence is close to the Dempster highway. In a month or two the cold harsh weather will be setting in with many months of temperatures usually below minus 20 Celsius. I recall an old RGM RNS (in Jan 2019) saying that the ice usually thaws around June each year. So if the soil sampling results are promising then I guess some additional exploration may be done this time next year.

Found an interview with Dr Gareth Cave, the founder of Pharm2farm. It's from July last year.

I believe he starts talking around the 3 minute mark.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=22pS6R78DUI

Sadly those who bought in early are now sitting on large losses.

One person actually astounded me on twitter last night when he said because everyone had been quiet and hadn't ramped RMS this weekend that meant people were gonna be trying to buy in early. I mean it was a rampathon this weekend! TheTruth said 3 to 7p, he said in his exclusive Telegram group one or two had mentioned a 1000% rise on Monday.

I guess Telegram groups are not called Telescam groups for nothing.

RNS says: "Pharm2farm had unaudited revenues of £11,979 and profit of £4,292 for the seven month period ending 31 March 2020"
.......
Pharm2farm are mainly trying to sell fertilizers. Obviously looking at revenues to 31st March they aren't making much money from that side of the business.

Then in April Pharm2farm tried to get in on the Covid19 angle by selling Hand sanitizer but that failed and they quickly stopped selling Hand sanitizer.

Now Pharm2farm now have ambitions of getting in on the facemask market. RNS says: "Anti-viral Face Mask: Pharm2Farm is developing a nanotechnology enabled anti-viral face mask. Proof of concept and the design of a prototype is currently underway and expected to be completed by the end of the year"

End of the year is a long way away. There are already tens of thousands of facemask sellers. By the end of the year the Covid crisis may be over. And let's be honest many of us only wear a facemask not out of fear but because we are obliged too. We go to an enclosed place and whip on the mask, we leave the enclosed space and quickly whip it off again. It's nothing about fear it's just we are presently obliged the wear one. So any old cheap facemask will do. So if Pharm2farm think most of the nation are in panic and that means we will pay high prices for a facemask then I think Pharm2farm are deluded.

Lastly paying 600 million RMS shares for a tiny business like Pharm2farm is in my opinion ridiculous:. at a 0.50p RMS share price that would mean RMS are buying Pharm2farm for £3 million. I hope RMS management can justify that huge price tag otherwise it could end up being one of the most inexplicable deals on AIM that will ruin the reputations of the RMS management. And remember as soon as Pharm2farm founder Dr Gareth Cave sold any of his RMS shares then this share price would in my opinion tank.

I am personally not impressed with this proposed deal. We may not be required to wear a facemask at the end of the year. If we are still required then by then we may all have numerous facemasks already in our homes, so Pharm2farm would have missed the boat and been way too slow in getting their facemask onto the market.

It could be a bloodbath here today with many locked in with big losses. So be careful.

I don't know about a supergene. But I recall a few years ago SOLGOLD (SOLG) being a small market cap company and during their drill campaign they rocketed in price.

Just looking at the SOLG 5 year chart they were 3p on 23 June 2016 and by Nov 2016 they were 27p.

Of course their are many failures during drill campaigns. SOLG was just my example of a drill campaign success and the dramatic share price rise that could happen during the drill campaign.

And TheTruth "giving long termers a break". Yes I would love investors to make a profit but you are repeatedly being outrageous with your ramping price predictions.

So when you post outrageous price predictions that makes me want to give an alternative view of this deal because in all honesty it doesn't look that good to me.

On Monday I suspect many investors accounts will be devastated by RMS.

I see the hype on twitter with some saying Pharm2farm is a coronavirus company. It is not. This is not a company trying to find a cure for covid19 instead they are just a company trying to jump on the coronavirus bandwagon with aims of trying to sell a nanoparticle facemask.

Google "the dangers of nanoparticles" and you most definitely won't be buying a nanoparticle facemask for you or your loved one's. So even if it came to market they would try to sell them at sky high prices and the nanoparticle facemask business angle would quickly fail.

I won't be buying in Monday. It could be a bloodbath on Monday for many many investors.

Again remember pharm2farm is NOT a business searching for a Covid cure but instead a little fertilizer business trying to jump on the Covid bandwagon with aims of making facemasks.

I may be wrong but I have a sneaky feeling it may initially rise on Mondays opening but then the spread will be massive ... and then you'll only be able to sell for something like a 40% loss.

So i'd say especially to new investors be very careful otherwise you may buy in and then be sitting on big losses.

Lastly like I said this morning Google "the dangers of nanoparticles". It says it can potentially cause lung damage even cancers. I can guarantee none of you would buy and then be putting a nanoparticle facemask over your nose and mouth. It would be like wearing an asbestos facemask that in years to come may kill you.

Pharm2farm are mainly a fertilizer business. They have already previously failed with the Covid angle when they realised people weren't interested in buying their hand sanitizer at sky high rip off prices.

Like others have said why on earth did RMS pay such an high amount for pharm2farm? I can only assume Bravehearts Trevor Brown negotiated with RMS's Trevor Brown and Bravehearts Trevor Brown was such a good negotiator that RMS's Trevor Brown eventually caved in and agreed to pay such an high amount for Pharm2farm. If so well done Braveheart Trevor Brown you got a very good price. On the other hand RMS Trevor Brown you paid too high a price and you are a cr*p negotiator.

and one headline piece says:

"Health Risks Of Nanotechnology: How Nanoparticles Can Cause Lung Damage, And How The Damage Can Be Blocked. Summary: ... However, concerns are growing that it may have toxic effects, particularly damage to the lungs. Although nanoparticles have been linked to lung damage, it has not been clear how they cause it"

This doctor is also dubious: https://medium.com/center-for-biological-diversity/are-nanoparticles-in-fabric-harmful-ed3cb28fd06e

Pharm2farm are mainly a fertilizer company. Yes they want to get into the Covid market but would you want you or your family to wear a nanoparticle facemask made by a fertilizer company? I certainly wouldn't especially with the potential dangers of nanoparticles.
.......
On a potentially more positive note. The pharm2farm £4,200 profits for 7 months was only upto April. Since April they have been trying to sell (at extortionate prices) an hand sanitizer https://www.pharm2farm.org/product/hand-sanitiser-500ml/ .

It would be interesting if Pharm2farm made any significant profits from selling their Hand sanitizer. I not confident they will have made big profits because to me they are trying to sell their hand sanitizer at sky high rip off prices.

The posters Helpful and Longterm both say Briarbank sold too soon.

He sold after 10 years. 10 YEARS!!

So listed company Braveheart held a 51.72% stake in Pharm 2 Farm Limited. Looking at the Pharm 2 Farm website they mainly sell a protein & mineral product that is added to fertilizers which they claim helps crops grow. Yet from what I can see that 51.72% stake wasn't getting investors excited and they certainly didn't appear desperate to buy into Braveheart.

So my question is, now that RMS have announced they want to buy 100% of Pharm 2 Farm Limited. Why would this all of a sudden make investors excited when investors weren't previously excited about Braveheart holding 51.72% in Pharm 2 Farm Limited?

I listened to that interview and Paul Johnson sensibly avoided mentioning RRR or Andrew Bell.

I remember when Paul Johnson had a big shareholding in Regency mines (Bell's former company) and he often showed exasperation on his twitter at Regency mines putting potentially price changing RNSes after hours, also showed it with Andrew Bell's poor underwhelming interviews and Andrew Bell's poorly worded RNSes. So when Johnson joined Bell at POW I'm sure he insisted that he should do all the promotion. So far it's obviously working.

I actually felt sorry for the good honest (only honest ones) RRR shareholders the other day because that 17 August RRR RNS which announced the renewel of the Kenyan licences was woefully written. It was pretty obvious to everybody that Bell should've given it its own RNS instead bright but dim Bell decided to bury the news within a miserable coronavirus update RNS.

Yes I can't stand him! Good luck! I definitely won't post again.

Though I will say. I'm suspecting the garbage Tom Winnifrith will be all over this deal.

Unless of course he's mates with these sellers? Then he won't bother.

No. Don't worry I'm won't be posting again.

In the wacky world of AIM I'm sure it will rise. Good luck!