Member Info for zumore

See if i can fix first two links? All dressed up for a sharetalk interview? http://www.ehowzit.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/benny-hill.jpg 2014 Uk investor show with the promotion girls? https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTit1_P7T0ILq1UWTWQuhrTAbzWtw-PiChhc5uULy1h58RmhSmOWg

All dressed up for a sharetalk interview? http://www.ehowzit.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/benny-hill.jpg 2014 UK investor show with the promotion girls? http://www.runstop.de/segue06.jpg When he met Michael Jackson 20 years ago? https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSiyZ0AM9p91-I0CYTtWoOuecHufhe0hR5ovc4jo1plH3RDYP3a5A A photo of him with the old RRR board? https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRXYYDzGncr4K9KdX8DBC9Wy8WjieBMWZuidgQe7Jdoffo11gsy His reaction when he's just been asked an interesting question in a proactive investors interview? http://www.runstop.de/segue07.jpg

https://twitter.com/Boardo65/status/983786067575869440 Obviously that is a Sunday joke because that is Mr Bell in the photo. I'm not saying i'm an expert on belts but men's belts are usually very thick and chunky but in that photo that looks like a very thin ladies belt? and if i'm not mistaken it looks like a size 28 ladies size?

Seingred, i actually recall on 25-1 share consolidation day in December 2015 that one twitter user told Mr Bell that they had just bought some RRR shares at 0.20p, so although that price was brief, some people have made good profits in RRR since then. Though as you point out, todays 1p share price would only be 0.04p in the pre-consolidation share price and i along with many others first bought into RRR at well over 1p (before 25-1 share consolidation happened): so those newer shareholders who want more cheery optimistic posts from the older or former RRR shareholders, LOL it could never be. I actually said the other day that i couldn't see RRR completing the Congo deal but i guess Bell does have a long track record of investing in difficult countries, so that Congo is a war torn country and millions of people are trying to flee it, then this is probably the sort of investment Bell would do. And i personally think those that are negative on Bell would love him to do the Congo deal. Then again many who do like Bell want him to do the Congo deal and so i guess if the Congo deal does happen then all sides will be happy. :) Lastly, yes this share price has been good to many newer shareholders these past two years but unless there is a dramatic positive share price reaction to when Jupiter relist in a few days then i cannot see much more upward momentum here: i personally think a few weeks after the Jupiter IPO this share price will slowly start to fizzle out. And i certainly don't see the well known rampers (those that can affect the price) taking RRR on because from my observations they like to buy in at the stone cold bottom and they like to be the ramp creators, they don't like to buy in when others have already made "bags" in that share.

Maestro i think there are conditions to what you say. So i'll have to recheck the prospectus later. And i think the RRR share price was actually around 0.60p. If you yearn for this Congo deal and think it's attractive then who am i to dissuade you. I personally cannot see the Market markers looking kindly on a future RNS reconfirming that RRR would be giving away �490,000 in 0.65p RRR shares + $700,000 in cash. Then again i've been wrong numerous times in the past. Though if in a couple of years AB is moaning that it is difficult conditions out in the Congo then i doubt the majority of PIs would have little sympathy for him because he already knows that before he invests. Though like i said earlier i'll be amazed if the Congo deal happens.

People always wrongly assume that when a seller gets handed an amount of shares that they will sell responsibly but those who remember Elephant oil receiving RRR shares some years ago will confirm this is not true. RRR bought into Elephant oil and E.O received some RRR shares and they absolutely pulverised the RRR share price when they hammered those shares into the market.

Watching this on ITV news last evening about Congo: http://www.itv.com/news/2018-04-11/the-reality-of-ethnic-cleansing-in-the-democratic-republic-of-congo/ I can remember reading that 5 million had escaped Congo last year (so nothings changed). Watching that video last night with children with limbs chopped off and machete wounds on their head was not a nice sight. So i would be personally flabbergasted if RRR decide to invest in this violent country. I remember Seingred the other week mentioning a company who had invested in Congo (i forget the name) and the share price had not risen; likewise ABM (formerly Sula iron) had also invested in Congo and again zero effect on the ABM share price. I'm amazed how some of you want RRR to squander there money on this potential Congo investment. Remember if the deal happens then the sellers will get almost �500,000 in RRR shares at 0.65p share price. So do you really want that to happen?

Correction to last post. Should've read: "I mean can you imagine down the line RRR doing placings and Bell's excuse is that he can't sell Red Rock's Jupiter shares to get RRR some money because they are tied up in Escrow"

Hello Maestro, i am not overly convinced that Red Rock's Jupiter shareholding is a good enough reason for new PIs to invest in RRR. My reasonings are: I glanced at the new Jupiter prospectus last week and rather bizarrely RRR chairman Andrew Bell has put Red Rock's approx 18 million RRR shares in an escrow agreement where Red Rock may be unable to sell them for up to 2 years. So with his strange decision he's killed the possibility of Red Rock being able to sell those RRR shares anytime soon. I mean can you imagine down the line RRR doing placings and Bell's excuse is that he can't sell the RRR shares to get money because they are tied up in Escrow? So the above could be a serious offputter for potential RRR investors ....... Also i've said this previously but when an ordinary PI would be investing in Jupiter i'm sure they are willing to pay that Jupiter share price because they think they may in the near term directly get a cash dividend. But investors who are contemplating investing in RRR know that if Jupiter pay out a dividend then RRR are highly likely to keep that dividend money for themselves and pass none of that dividend money onto the RRR shareholders. So again no doubt the above is another serious offputter for potential RRR investors. ................. So when Jupiter relist i personally don't see an huge swathe of investors piling into RRR. Of course i'm not saying the pumpers won't create an initial spike but then i'm sure those impaled on the spike would quickly realise that Red Rock's Jupiter shareholding offers nothing directly to RRR shareholders.

I remember Andrew Bell bragging in a Zac Mir's interview a few years ago that his companies have survived on AIM over the years while many others have ceased to exist. But a �10,000 investment in RGM when they first listed would now be worth just over �100 and a �10,000 investment in RRR when they first listed would now be worth just under �200. So although both companies do still exist, Andrew Bell obliterated both companies share prices by relentless dilution and so he did little (in my opinion) to protect shareholders investments: so i'm guessing zero praise from those longterm shareholders who now have near worthless investments.

No Panther. I live nowhere near London but more importantly i would learn nothing by traveling hundreds of miles to watch a presentation by Andrew Bell because he's not a new person who nobody knows about but instead a person who's been running RGM for over 13 years and so his meagre abilty is already well known. I often find people and companies often try to complicate things when judging whether a chairman has been a success for shareholders at a company but i often think you should simplify things when judging success. So we simply judge success by looking at these two points. (1) RGM listed on AIM in 2005 with a 2p RGM share price, they did a 20-1 share consolidation in 2015, so a person who had invested �10,000 when RGM first listed in 2005 would now have an investment worth just over �100 (2) Andrew Bell has been running RGM since 2005 and although i don't know his wages for each of those years, it's highly likely he's been paid �millions in wages during his 13 years in charge of RGM. ......... So point one would indicate RGM longterm shareholders initial investment would have been decimated. Point two would indicate that this RGM chairman, although not delivering for RGM shareholders has been been paid handsomely. So this past 13 years has been financially brilliant for this RGM chairmans personal wealth and absolutely terrible for RGM shareholders personal wealth. That above is actually a kind of due diligence for potential new investors because it shows that ultimately this chairman gets paid handsomely but in return he delivers little for shareholders.

Correction last post should've said: "I've no doubt it will again this year"

show. And bearing in mind the atrocious stinking interview (if you call it that) that both Bell and Kaintz did the other week with share-talk, how can the expectations be anything but low? Cgull on the other thread reminded me of how few turned up to watch Bell at last years investor show. And it was at one of the peak periods when the coal ramping frenzy was going into overdrive. I remember i had that embarrassing photo in my old posts. Here it is: https://twitter.com/pauljohnson9691/status/848133438821552128 Of course those who had watched Bell in the past presenting knew that he's usually garbage at presenting and so they gave his presentation a big swerve. Of course the two who weren't in the know (see photo) did turn up. His dreadful presentations usually drop this price. I know doubt it will again this year.

i didn't mean gut wrenching i meant sick inducing.

reading that promotion piece by TW. I mean could he have mentioned Riverfort any more times in that promotion article? Most people know that Bell is Winnifriths good friend and Brian Kinane CEO of RIverfort capital is also Winnifiths dear friend. Unsurprisingly both Bell and Kinane will both be presenting at Winnifrith's 2018 UK investor show in just over two weeks. We can confidently dismiss that promotion article. In my opinion it was gut wrenching.

I should've said "none of above came true (in below RNSes) about the coal". Of course it w true RGM had interests in coal bed methane and oil exploration.

From 27th March 2017 RNS: Andrew Bell comments: "Progress has continued, with necessary adjustments to the permits to enable use of a higher capacity drilling method creating only minor slippage in our timings. We expect sales and movements off site of mined coal in early April (Zu note: that would've been April 2017); we may achieve (but may just miss) our more ambitious target of first mined production by the end of March (Zu note: that would've been March 2017)" From 20th April 2017 RNS: "Regency has interests including coal bed methane and oil exploration, and is now bringing into production metallurgical coal projects in the Appalachian coal belt in the Eastern United States" .......... Many PIs lots lots of money investing in RGM last year because they trusted and believed what the RGM chairman told them in official RGM company RNSes. None of the above came true. In my opinion the biggest AIM scandal of 2017 because it was absolutely shocking how the company (RGM) misled PIs.

the official meaning of the word "con man" "a man/woman who cheats or tricks someone by gaining their trust and persuading them to believe something that is not true" .......... From May 3rd 2017 RNS: "The Company is currently at a vital inflection point. With two projects now coming into coal production revenue in the very near term, the validation of our strategies will, we believe, become increasingly clear to investors." Well none of that came true. ^^^ Shocking that lots of PIs lost a fortune by investing in RGM in 2017 because they believed the RGM chairman that two coal mines were coming into coal production. He gained their trust .. and what he told PIs never came true: in my opinion absolutely disgusting!

This is the link to big shareholder Darren's tweet in December: https://twitter.com/darrenhazelwood/status/938826765996318722

in December big shareholder Darren wasn't best pleased. Back then he tweeted: "Over the last 12 months the business has generated nearly �5m via numerous avenues. As the market capitalisation currently sits approximately 40% below that figure I politely ask the BOD�s to return the stock granted by the trustees." ..... Of course a month after Darren's tweet Bell/Kaintz diluted shareholders further by raising another �1,15 million. Out of that they repaid their whopping YA loan and made another �200,000 investment in rent a car company WHITE CAR and so now highly likely that �1,15 million has almost gone. So i wouldn't be surprised if in the next month or two Bell and his sidekick try and replenish the company funds by doing another fundraising.