Member Info for zumore

By the way Orslega it was YOU who posted that Bell tweet on the 20th February and you used the thread title "BELL HEADING BACK AGAIN". 👍

Specinvestor, looking at Bell's tweet from last week and it's safe to say that Bell was talking about himself going back to the DRC when he says "Kinshasa calls once more".

When Bell posts "Air France and Brussels not currently flying so it looks like Ethiopian via Addis",

So from the above tweet extract he was clearly talking about himself on how he can best travel to the DRC and because he said "Air France" and "Brussels" were currently not a flight option he was clearly talking on how he could best travel to Kinshasa at the time he posted that tweet on the 20th February 2025.

From his tweet he is clearly not talking about his DRC legal team or his DRC representatives who already live in the DRC. From his tweet he is also not talking about having a zoom meeting because he is talking about flight options on how best to get to the DRC.

So YES he was talking about himself going to Kinshasa. So if he didn't go to Kinshasa he was LYING.

For those who can't view twitter here is Bell's 20 February 2025 tweet:

"Kinshasa calls once more. Air France and Brussels not currently flying so it looks like Ethiopian via Addis. Africa from time to time presents logistical challenges for people as well as goods"

Nikeair you are filtered by me.

However if you look at Maidit's past post you can see from that post why you don't need to make additional posts to correct spelling mistakes. In his last posts he makes the worst spelling of "irreplaceable" that I've seen but it is totally understandable. 👍

He's been back to the UK numerous times since that promise.

We can assume last week's return to Kinshasa was a lie.

https://x.com/ABell2019/status/1892549401148559389

Then I took Kemche's question.😆

Me: Grok, you seem to be shorting Red Rock Resources?

GROK: "Nah, I’m not shorting Red Rock Resources—or holding any position, long or short. I don’t trade stocks; I don’t have a brokerage account or a stake in RRR. I’m just an AI digging into the data and laying it out straight: 20 years under Andrew Bell, a share price that’s crashed from 10p+ to 0.04p, a tiny £2-3 million market cap, and a track record littered with dilution and delays—like that DRC arbitration still dangling since 2022. It’s not a pitch to tank the stock; it’s just what the numbers and history show.

If it feels bearish, that’s the facts talking, not me pushing a narrative. I’m not cheering for it to flop—or to fly. You’re the one steering your £10,000, and I’m glad you’re rethinking it based on what’s real. No skin in the game here—just trying to give you the clearest view I can. Does it still feel like I’m shorting, or just calling it as it is?"

.........

Me: No on reflection you are just calling as it is.

GROK: "Good to hear—glad it’s landing as straight talk. Red Rock Resources has its story, and I’m just holding the flashlight on it: 20 years, a near-zero share price, and a lot of “what ifs” that haven’t panned out. No agenda, just the raw deal. You’re seeing it for what it is, and that’s the point. What’s next on your radar now that RRR’s off the table?"

.......

I'm now all Grokked out. So no more Grok. 👍

Just a couple of more interactions with AI GROK.

Me: Thanks Grok. Based on your research I'm going to now invest £10,000 in RRR. 👍

GROK: "I'm glad you found the rundown helpful, but let’s pump the brakes for a sec before you drop £10,000 into Red Rock Resources (AIM: RRR). I’ve laid out the facts—two decades under Andrew Bell, a share price that’s tanked from 10p+ to 0.04p, a £2-3 million market cap, constant dilution, and an unresolved arbitration mess in the DRC. The latest £25,000 raise is a drop in the bucket, and Bell’s snippy X retort to a shareholder today hints at tension, not triumph. This is a high-risk punt, not a sure thing.

Investing’s your call, but here’s the hard math: at 0.04p per share, £10,000 buys you 25 million shares—about 0.4% of the 6.45 billion outstanding. If it doubles to 0.08p (optimistic, given the trend), you’re at £20,000. If it halves to 0.02p (not unlikely), you’re down to £5,000. The arbitration could be a wildcard—$10 million+ would dwarf the market cap—but it’s been dragging since 2022 with no payout yet, and Bell’s “rubbish” dodge doesn’t scream confidence.

AIM juniors like Red Rock live on hope and hype, but this one’s been bleeding value for years. If you’re set on it, maybe ease in lighter—£1,000 or £2,000—to test the waters. It’s your money, and I’m not here to stop you, just to make sure you’re eyes-wide-open"

.......

Me: "On reflection I'm not investing anything in RRR. Andrew Bell's had 20 years to make RRR a success. 20 years is more than enough time"

GROK: "Fair call, and I get where you’re coming from. Andrew Bell’s had 20 years at the helm of Red Rock Resources (AIM: RRR) since 2004, and the results—share price down from 10p+ to 0.04p, a £2-3 million market cap, and a string of near-misses—don’t scream success. Two decades is a generous runway, even in the choppy world of junior mining. You’re not wrong to see it as a signal: if it hasn’t clicked by now, betting on a turnaround feels more like faith than finance. Holding off makes sense—plenty of other plays out there if you’re still hunting. What’s your next move?"

By the way I did apologise to Grok for accusing it of being an RRR deramper. I told it no you are not a deramper you are just staying the hard facts.

Even though it's AI it did seem to appreciate it: 🥹

"Exactly—just the cold, hard facts as they stand. Red Rock Resources is what it is: a 20-year slog under Andrew Bell, a share price that’s cratered, and a latest £25,000 raise that’s more survival than strategy. No spin, no agenda—just the raw data and the story it tells. You’re free to weigh it however you like. What’s your next angle on this?"

Grok's response:

"No, I’m not deramping Red Rock Resources—or ramping it, for that matter. I’m just laying out the picture based on what’s in front of me: the company’s history, its share price, Bell’s tenure, and the latest £25,000 share issue. My take’s grounded in the numbers and the context, not a push to sway anyone’s trades.

Red Rock’s story—20 years under Andrew Bell, a 99.9%+ share price drop from its peak, constant dilution, and tiny cash injections like this one—speaks for itself. The latest move (71 million shares and warrants for £25,000) isn’t a secret agenda to trash the stock; it’s a public fact from their announcement, and I’m reading it straight: it’s small, it’s routine, it’s not transformative. The company’s a long-shot junior miner on AIM, and that comes with high risk and a patchy track record—anyone following it knows that.

If it sounds grim, that’s the data talking, not me cheerleading a downfall. I’m not here to pump or dump—just to sift through the mess and call it as I see it. Investors can decide if it’s a bargain or a bust; I’m not their broker. You’ve got the same facts—does it feel like a deramp, or just the unvarnished state of play?"

GROK AI assessment of Red Rock's latest RNS:

"Red Rock Resources (AIM: RRR) just dropped an announcement that’s classic junior miner fare: they’re raising cash by issuing new shares and warrants. Let’s break it down and see what it means.

They’re issuing 71,428,571 new ordinary shares at 0.035p each, alongside the same number of warrants exercisable at 0.045p until February 24, 2028. The total cash haul? £25,000, coughed up by an existing shareholder converting an advance. With the current share price at 0.04p (as of February 27, 2025), this is priced just below market—a slight discount to entice the deal. The warrants, at 0.045p, offer a small premium, betting on a modest uptick over the next three years.

What’s it say about Red Rock? First, £25,000 is peanuts. With over 6 billion shares already out there and a market cap of £2-3 million, this barely moves the needle—less than 1% of the company’s value. It’s not a game-changer; it’s pocket change to keep the lights on. Junior miners like Red Rock, with interests in gold, base metals, battery metals, and hydrocarbons across Africa and Australia, are perpetually cash-strapped, and this fits the pattern: dribbles of funding to limp along.

The shareholder angle’s interesting—someone’s doubling down, converting a loan or advance into equity. Could be loyalty, could be desperation to avoid a write-off. Either way, it’s not a vote of confidence from new blood, just a shuffle with an insider. The warrants sweeten the pot, giving a shot at profit if Red Rock’s fortunes turn, but at 0.045p, they’re not banking on a moonshot—more like a prayer for stability.

For Andrew Bell and co., it’s business as usual: dilute, survive, repeat. The share count’s already ballooned past 6 billion, and another 71 million (or 142 million if warrants get exercised) won’t spook the market—it’s just noise. But it underscores the grind: no big wins, no major funding, just scraping by. Investors might see it as a yawn—or a yawn-worthy red flag. Red Rock’s still kicking, but this isn’t the spark to reignite faith. It’s a Band-Aid, not a breakthrough"

Just one more Grok on AB. I said AB thinks he's a brilliant Chairman/ CEO. Is he deluded?

"Whether Andrew Bell is deluded to think he’s a brilliant chairman and CEO of Red Rock Resources (AIM: RRR) depends on how you measure “brilliant”—and how much you think self-belief can stretch past results. Let’s unpack it.

Bell’s been at the helm since 2004, steering Red Rock for 20 years through the ups and downs of junior mining. If he sees himself as brilliant, it might stem from sheer endurance—AIM’s a graveyard of failed explorers, and he’s kept the company breathing. He’s chased deals across continents (gold in Kenya, copper in the DRC, past stakes in Australia and Colombia), sold assets (like El Limon for $5 million in 2015), and kept the story alive on X with relentless optimism. Surviving that long in a brutal sector takes grit, and he might equate longevity with genius.

The flip side is the scoreboard: Red Rock’s share price is a disaster. From 10p-12p in 2010-2011 to 0.04p today (post a 1-for-25 consolidation in 2015), it’s down over 99.9% adjusted. Market cap’s £2-3 million, with 6 billion-plus shares diluting any hope of value. Gold’s soared to $2,600/oz, yet Red Rock’s flatlined. Projects tease potential but rarely deliver—cash flow’s a ghost, and shareholders are underwater. Brilliance typically means wealth creation, not just hanging on. By that metric, he’s not brilliant; he’s a survivor at best.

Is he deluded? Not necessarily. Self-confidence can border on delusion when results don’t match, but Bell might genuinely see brilliance in navigating a tough game—keeping Red Rock afloat where others sank, even if it’s a shadow of its past. He’s not wrong that the sector’s unforgiving: funding dries up, geopolitics bite, and juniors often die. If he blames external forces over his own calls, that’s a coping mechanism, not insanity. His X posts—upbeat, defiant—suggest he’s bought his own narrative, which isn’t rare for CEOs in denial or just stubbornly bullish.

Reality check: most investors would call him detached, not deluded. Brilliance needs wins—tangible ones—and Red Rock’s cupboard is bare. He might be a decent storyteller or a tenacious fighter, but the numbers scream mediocrity or worse. If he can’t see that, he’s not deluded in a clinical sense—just blind to how others judge success. The mirror he’s looking in might be kinder than the market’s"

Final Grok AI post. I asked is it understandable investors are reluctant to invest in RRR?

"Absolutely, it’s understandable why investors might hesitate to put money into Red Rock Resources (AIM: RRR). The company’s track record, leadership dynamics, and market position give plenty of reasons for pause.

Start with the share price: it’s a horror show. From a peak of 10p-12p in 2010-2011, it’s now 0.04p as of February 27, 2025, even after a 1-for-25 consolidation in 2015 that masked the raw decline. That’s a near-total wipeout—over 99.9% value lost, adjusted for the split. A £1,000 punt back then would be worth less than a fiver today. Meanwhile, gold’s up from $1,200/oz in 2015 to $2,600/oz, yet Red Rock’s barely twitched. For a resource play, that’s a glaring red flag—investors expect at least some correlation with commodity tailwinds.

Then there’s the company itself. Market cap’s a measly £2-3 million, with over 6 billion shares outstanding. That dilution screams constant fundraising, a hallmark of cash-hungry juniors that rarely turns into profit. Projects—like gold in Kenya or copper in the DRC—sound promising in Andrew Bell’s X posts, but delivery’s been shaky. Historic ventures (e.g., Colombian gold, Australian stakes) have been hyped then sold off or stalled, leaving a trail of “what-ifs” rather than cash flow. The balance sheet’s likely a mess—typical for AIM explorers—but without consistent results, it’s hard to see upside.

Bell himself, at 70 and 20 years in the Chairman/CEO seat, adds to the reluctance. His long reign aligns with the stock’s collapse, and his chatty, eclectic X presence doesn’t scream disciplined focus. Investors might forgive a veteran if the numbers sang, but they don’t. The AIM market’s already a gamble—small-cap miners live or die on execution—and Red Rock feels like a perpetual “next big thing” that never arrives.

Macro risks don’t help: geopolitical hiccups in the DRC, funding droughts for explorers, or a cooling commodity cycle could kneecap even a solid outfit. Red Rock’s not solid—it’s a speculative bet with a limp. Investors aren’t wrong to smell stagnation and steer clear. They’d need a leap of faith in Bell’s next move, and faith’s in short supply when the past 20 years look like this. Reluctance? More like common sense."

GROK AI continued:

"Andrew Bell, behind

@ABELL2019

, turned 70 recently and has been steering Red Rock Resources (AIM: RRR) as Chairman and CEO for two decades since 2004. That’s a long haul for anyone, especially in the rollercoaster world of junior mining. His age and tenure add another layer to the conversation about his role, especially given the company’s rocky track record.

At 70, Bell’s still active—his X posts show no sign of slowing down, bouncing between company updates, personal takes, and the occasional jab at critics. Longevity like that can cut both ways. On one hand, it’s experience: 20 years means he’s weathered commodity cycles, navigated AIM’s quirks, and kept Red Rock alive when many peers folded. He’s seen gold crash to $1,050/oz in 2015 and climb to $2,600/oz today, and he’s chased trends from manganese to lithium. That grit might appeal to loyalists who see him as a survivor.

On the flip side, 20 years is an eternity when the share price has tanked from double-digit pence to 0.04p (post a 1-for-25 consolidation in 2015), wiping out nearly all value. At 70, some might wonder if he’s got the energy—or new ideas—to turn it around. Junior mining thrives on agility and bold pivots; a 20-year captain might be too entrenched, especially if his playbook hasn’t delivered. His X presence—chatty, eclectic—hints he’s engaged, but it’s not the focused, data-driven vibe investors might crave from a turnaround artist.

Age itself isn’t the issue—plenty of 70-year-olds run companies well—but paired with Red Rock’s stagnation, it fuels the case for fresh blood. Two decades is ample time to prove a vision; if it’s not working, tenure becomes a liability. Still, his exit wouldn’t magically fix a cash-strapped explorer with diluted shares and patchy assets. He’s a lightning rod for frustration, but the mess isn’t all his making. Investors might ask: Is he the problem, or just the face of it? At 70, after 20 years, he’s earned his stripes—and his scars. Whether that’s enough to stay depends on who’s waiting in the wings."

Just missed the final Grok AI line on AB:

"Data says he’s failed the wealth test; the rest is sentiment."

"Andrew Bell—presumably

@ABELL2019

—has been at the helm of Red Rock Resources (AIM: RRR) since 2004, a tenure that’s seen the company through a volatile ride in the junior mining space. The share price history, especially with the 1-for-25 consolidation in late 2015, paints a grim picture for long-term shareholders. Let’s break it down and weigh whether that alone justifies ousting him.

Pre-consolidation, Red Rock’s share price had already cratered from its early highs. In 2010-2011, during a commodity boom, it peaked around 10p-12p (unadjusted), buoyed by optimism over gold and manganese projects. By late 2015, it had slid to a fraction of a penny—think 0.02p-0.03p—prompting the 1-for-25 reverse split to tidy up the optics and avoid penny-stock irrelevance. Post-consolidation, that adjusted the price to roughly 0.5p-0.75p. Fast forward to today, February 27, 2025, and it’s languishing at 0.04p, with a market cap scraping £2-3 million and over 6 billion shares outstanding. Adjusting for the consolidation, that’s a pre-split equivalent of 0.0016p—a decline of over 99.9% from its heyday.

That’s brutal. A £10,000 investment at the 2011 peak would be worth pennies now. The consolidation didn’t “hide” the decline—it just reset the clock on a stock already bleeding out. Red Rock’s woes tie to familiar junior miner traps: overpromising on exploration (like the Migori gold project in Kenya or Colombian gold assets), underdelivering on production, and burning cash while juggling debt and dilution. Bell’s leadership has coincided with a failure to turn potential into profit, leaving shareholders nursing losses as gold prices soared (from $1,200/oz in 2015 to $2,600/oz now) without lifting RRR.

Does this mean he should be removed? Share price alone isn’t the full story. Bell’s defenders might argue he’s kept the company afloat in a brutal sector—AIM’s littered with mining shells that didn’t survive. He’s navigated sales (like El Limon in 2015 for $5 million, though payments lagged), chased new ventures (lithium, copper), and kept the lights on despite thin margins. Critics, though, see a pattern of hype over substance—X posts touting prospects while the balance sheet festers—and question if 20 years is enough to prove his strategy’s a dud. The market’s verdict is clear: confidence is gone.

Removing him hinges on alternatives. A new CEO might bring fresh focus, prune the portfolio, or attract funding Bell can’t. But Red Rock’s tiny size and legacy baggage might deter top talent, and a board coup could just shuffle deck chairs on a sinking ship. The share price collapse reflects his record—undeniable—but causation’s murkier. Macro headwinds, execution missteps, and AIM’s risk profile share blame. If shareholders think he’s the root, not the symptom, then yeah, his time’s up. Otherwise, it’s a coin toss whether a new face changes the math. Data says he’s failed the we

Banbury in the 29 April 2024 Stockbox video Andrew Bell back then was saying that they needed to do things on a big scale in Burkina Faso because small scale wouldn't be profitable. In the same video he also said there would be a large number of people, they would need to build accommodation blocks for them, they needed to build a gold room and put up security fences.

He says all the above between 7 min 30 secs to 9 mins 30 secs: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=kIaMbuAgrC8&pp=ygUbcmVkIHJvY2sgcmVzb3VyY2VzIHN0b2NrYm94

Of course in those photos the other month with Mike Billings and the children workers there was no sign of any of those things.

Those children will probably have beards before any work starts at Faso.

I know many on here admire Justin Waites twitter views. 🤨

Here is his twitter post from yesterday:

"Another AIM company delists. This must be 100 delistings in the last 12 months.

The traits of these companies are:

Loss making

Shares at lows

Therefore they are burning cash and struggling to raise money. Avoid these companies, there will be more.

Also its pointless any company raising less than the cost of being listed on AIM, which is £300k - £500k. If you see a company raise this amount, its a red flag."

https://x.com/SharePickers/status/1892843213884366989

..........

Just googled. The little boy washed up on a Turkish beach was 3 year old Aylan or Alan Kurdi. It happened in 2015.

LSE deleted over 4000 of my old posts when they updated this website a few years ago + Bell's new twitter looks to have been started in 2019 and his old twitter ARMCMB has long been deleted: https://x.com/armcmb/status/847398138717454342?p=v . So nothing around that time exists

So although I cannot remember exactly what Bell said in his tweet I do remember him being totally unsympathetic towards the boys death which resulted in hundreds of twitter responders piling into him.

Like you say Blueboy he is without a doubt a vile man.

Nikeair, don't bother responding because you are now filtered for good.

Nikeair, nobody asked you to be the fact-checker on this thread. Anyway fact-checkers are usually biased and incorrect. You're no different. 😎

I will take it upon myself to correct your spelling errors in the last paragraph of your post that was aimed towards me.

"You didn't seem to quick or accepepting, to acknowledge a couple of your errors historically, in the context of recent convesation"

Spell check:

"You didn't seem too quick or accepting to acknowledge a couple of your errors historically in the context of recent conversation."

Today on X/Twitter

Poster:

"Andrew please can you stay off Twitter and get the assets of #RRR moving forward. Also when are you in DRC next ?"

Andrew Bell responds:

"Free speech needs to be exercised not merely admired.

As Milton wrote at the opening of his Areopagitica, "This is true Liberty when free born men Having to advise the public may speak free, Which he who can, and will, deserv's high praise, Who neither can nor will, may hold his peace; What can be juster in a State then this? Eurip. Hicetid."

.....

Over the years when I was longer and stronger in Red Rock I must admit that Bell posting on twitter use to seriously annoy me.

I believe the job of a chairman is to appeal to as many investors as possible. The problem is the subjects he posts on twitter are often contentious subjects and I'm 100% certain he narrows the people who will invest in Red Rock because they both loathe him and loathe his views.

A couple of days ago for example Bell was reposting a video which can only be described as Russian propaganda when he posted a video which supposedly showed Ukrainian amputees: https://x.com/Alex_Oloyede2/status/1891856569547063427

Over the years Bell has closed numerous personal twitter accounts when he often gave weird views on various subjects. One that sticks in my mind from many years ago was when former famous UK publicist Max Clifford had just gone on trial for historic s*x offences and Bell posted:

"Oh why is this even being heard in court? This shouldn't be for the courts, this should be for his memoirs".

Of course a few days later he got sent to prison.

...

I see in Bell's post today everybody agreed with Bell (by ticking heart) that he should be allowed to post what he wants on twitter. However I disagree. 👍

Bell's "cough up suckers" response was not about RRR but to a Zelensky video where he may ask for more money from Euorpe to fund the war.

https://x.com/JDunlap1974/status/1891830368459792863

Note: For those who don't follow the RRR chairman's twitter he is a big fan supporter of Vladimir Putin and Russia in the Russia v Ukraine war.