Member Info for Zellman

THEOWLMAN..You can only "THINK" it may have big potential ..You have" NO PROOF"..NONE!!!!!
Like you say about myself it is only in my mind and you are the same "IT IS ONLY IN THEOWLMANS MINE" no proof of oil otherwise my feathered friend this share would not be at 2.8p..would it?

THEOLWMAN..We all know what will happen if Velociraptor is a duster..so stop making out its a "done deal" that we will strike the black stuff..

LOL..... Bigbench

What has happened !!!! I take the dog for a walk and the "The OWLMAN" has returned

Notice that THEOWLMAN has disappeared today..One bit of good news I suppose!!!

That must make 2 of us TWEET! TWEET!! HOOT!!.. as I believe you Said "you are invested in MATD" and you buy more shares when time is good like now low price:). Yer!!!!!!!

That is if you take the word of M.B ..No proof of payment UWOS.. maybe you should have gone to "Spec Savers" when you read RNS

I am not a trader (wish I was though rich Crooks).I am just an "Old Git" who invested a lot of his "hard earned" in MATD and I like to debate while also hopefully pointing out a few untruths on this board that are "NOT FACTS"....
WOS YOU WROTE THIS:
Mr Zellman MÀTD raise fund to pay for new licence application AND for new JV company with Woolfson which need money to go in to set up company AND so Velocirapror full ready to go NOW..
So WOS can you please answer the below questions on your statement.
Is this fact?
Have you proof ..if it is fact?
Where did your proof and fact come from?
.............................
Ojay ..I know I say "would have" "could have" and "maybe" but it is just discussion with other investors and I don't know the "FACTS" so what else can I say without telling untruths?

That's a far point Doc83 and I do hope your assumption is the correct one...

I am not a de-ramper so let's get that straight....It just got me thinking why the Company raised Funds when the share price was around 4.0p.This when we all know the share price would have risen to 7-9 p on the next release of good news and then M.B could have raised funds at a reduced rate of 4.5p and not the 2.5p rate... that would have given the company a lot more investment funds in the bank to go forward with....So maybe there is a load of SH*T news coming down the road so M.B raises funds while things where looking good..Just a thought

Welcome to the wonderful world of MATD investing ...its like being drawn into a relationship with a beautiful lady and spending all your "hard earned" just to keep her with you but then never being able to secure that true love you desire..
Only time will reveal the outcome !!!!!

Thanks the lot MisterPositive... that has solve my inquiry and much obliged for you to take the time.

Okay ,I have responded in a way that I feel is straight and true to the way you approached my email.
Now to put you straight on why I have a grievance with the latest MATD fundraising .
It could have been first opened to Long Term (suffering) Holders of MATD for a period of time say 7-10 days for them to register there interest in the amount of shares they wish to purchase @2.5p and provide proof of funds for the purchase the the shares.
If the full quoter of £6 million of MATD shares had not been sold then the remaining shares could have been sent to the open market for sale to the general public..
This may have reduced the amount in the reduction of the share price and also given the people who have supported this Company thought the many years a chance to have a good earner in the process..
The way this looks to me is..... everyone in the loop got the nod off M.B ..the share price dipped before the announcement for no apparent reason...LTH got a pittance amount of shares to fight over..To me it just stinks..Saying that... I do believe in the future of MATD its just that LTH have again been robbed by short term profit makers on are long term price we will end up with!!.

I will respond Ojay ..I own MATD shares and have done for a long time.. Insulting myself or any other person who has an opinion is a low form of trying to belittle or shut that person up ....Now why would you want to do that Ojay?

09-Feb-23 08:22:48 3.05 150,000 Unknown* 3.00 3.05 4,575 O
09-Feb-23 08:22:48 3.05 -50,000 Unknown* 3.00 3.05 -1,525 O
Hi,I have asked this question before but got no reply..So I will try again..
On the 150,000 unknown transaction there is no "minus indicator" on the amount paid or the amount of share .
on the 50,000 unknown transaction there "IS A MINUSE INDICATOR " - before the amount paid and the amount of shares.
Does anyone know the reason why? Thanks ...

The "Sales Team" are pushing this share a little to much me thinks...just as the share price dips ..I wonder if they are ..The forward sellers that make their profits at the expense of pre-existing (and often long-term) shareholders, who’s stakes are diluted and hence devalued.

If say a person was given the option to buy £25000 of shares @0.025 and all the hype about the company then went crazy saying things like ...50x bagger... don't miss out share will go to the moon on news.. before fundraising the share price was maybe .04 pence ..price drops to say 0.028p then 2 days later goes up to 0.03p....So that person can forward sell the share and pocket £30000 making a risk free £5000..The LTH has been shafted they are stuck at the price they paid before the fundraising ..not the great deal of .025p .That is why LTH are pi**ed off !!!!

See all the buy MATD now "sale of the century" 50x bagger...just as the share price dips ..I wonder if they are ..The forward sellers that make their profits at the expense of pre-existing (and often long-term) shareholders, who’s stakes are diluted and hence devalued.

The forward sellers make their profits at the expense of pre-existing (and often long-term) shareholders, who’s stakes are diluted and hence devalued.
The buyers of the forward sellers’ shares may not be aware of what is going on (that was certainly the case in the Nighthawk example) and are purchasing shares that the company is issuing at a price that is inflated relative to the issue price. In the New World case, anyone buying shares from the forward seller at 0.075p was paying 36% more than they could have paid, had the company made the shares directly available to investors.
A less obvious problem is that for this practice to succeed, there needs to be a strong market for the shares that the company is issuing to the forward sellers. In my experience, one often finds very bullish comments about the worth of the company at such times, which can mislead investors and encourage them to overpay. In the case of New World, investors ultimately found themselves with worthless shares, as the company subsequently delisted.

Cheers Doc83,But we can but try ...Im just an "Old Gezzer" who is a LTH havin a moan!!!