Member Info for yayay

The elephant in the room, cj, as we all know, is that anyone contemplating a JV with UFO, for any one of our projects, will realise that they could buy the whole caboodle, including the paper clips, for £10m.

Cj, I first came into this share on the back of people pumping it as "the best silver play out there". And have wasted four years here so far. Frankly I couldn't really care at the moment if UFO had discovered rare metals on the Moon. I'd rather we went full steam ahead on iron ore and got a) some production, b) some income, and c) some credibility.

I am assuming, Steve, that you write with irony. Since the rise from 0.13 a couple of days ago to 0.135 is not the most astronomical of bounces.

You and I are perhaps in a minority, cj, in being of the generation that would even notice - but more particularly, care - about the lack of capital letters. LOL

Thanks, cj. I think this is another illustration of UFO's less than perfect ability at communication. I have known other companies where we have known more or less chapter and verse on where we stand, what the processes are, what documentation is in hand. "All mining approvals necessary" lacks any precision.

Lyndon, you seem to be the one positive person on here at the moment, so perhaps I can address this question to you. One line that did strike me from yesterday's RNS with regard to Han...k was something along the lines of continuing to pursue mining permissions. What ones are we still seeking, then? I thought we had permission.

With all due respect, Gtm, you can have new targets till the proverbial cows come home. Targets aren't earning you a penny. We were all led to believe that the old target was going to be doing that for us. Before the cows had gone out.

I've been a LTH here and, sadly, I am going to have to go against all my principles. I've never been a trader, neither here nor in other shares I've held. But I am now going to have to grit my teeth and trade UFO. Because that is the only way I am going to be able to salvage anything at all here. As a "multi-bagger", this ain't ever going to happen.

I would give just a little bit more credibility to WHI's research notes if just now and again they would "see fair value" as 2.6p or 2.8p. As things stand, it almost smacks as though they write these things backwards. It has been 2.7p since the Beginning of Time.

Don't worry, C@B, with Rishi Sunak's Back to the Future plans we'll soon be transporting convicts to Oz, and they can start digging the mine.

I was amused by nap's comment yesterday that it's a "waiting game now". If you emphasise the "now", I suppose it's in stark contrast to the rocket-fuelled ride we're used to experiencing.

Yes, Bfd, it's really quite ridiculous if put into context. You can't even buy a quarter of a half-decent footballer for £11m.

Were people really "singing and dancing" on here all weekend? Goodness! It was nice weather where I am. In fact, here in South West Scotland we only get nice weather two days of the year, so I'd certainly not waste them "singing and dancing" on here. Each to their own.

Careful, cj, you might be jumped on for "having sold up and desperate to get back in". We can't let factual evidence get in the way of our heading to the moon.

Same here, Norm. What I see on my phone is about 5% chat and 95% ads. And the 5% whizzes up and down so fast it's virtually illegible.

Forgive this off-topic, but is it just my cookie settings? Or are others as irritated as me by the ads which cause this page to bounce all over the place while you're trying to read? I'm now getting British Airways ads that suddenly take over the page altogether, completely blanking everything else out.

With all due respect to my fellow commenters on here, one thing I do try to keep at the forefront of my mind is the danger of us all getting utterly fixated by our own navel gazing. We just have to remember that we are just one small fish amongst hundreds (thousands?) on AIM alone, off the radar probably of even the vast majority of AIM investors or traders. There is not a red telephone sitting on Kim Jong Un's desk, waiting to ring with the latest news of UFO.

Well, cj, no Thursday RNS, so far at least.

Thank God, no good news! We want the sp to go up, not down. :)

Yes, as ever it will require patience for UFO to come good. Sadly, for the likes of cj and myself, patience will not be enough. It would require a life expectancy well beyond what medical science would see as attainable in the foreseeable future.

Sorry to disagree with you, napthman1, but I do think that it's a bit of a thin argument that the lack of a CEO is worthwhile because it saves on the cost of a salary. At what point do you draw the line? Because if a really big positive potential development occurs then it might be too late to get anyone in post to implement it.