Member Info for WoodyB

So the £10m is definitely not a facility, it is essential to keep the company operational for about 3 months. I can see why SG refused to tell me the CAB and monthly running costs. Nothing on the strategic review. I hope there is a real plan behind this. Three months.

I'm not surprised by the SP reaction today. The undisclosed short term loan or facility could be from Mrs Mather for all we know. Hopefully it is from major potential investor. We cannot lose sight of the fact that SG has unknown cash at bank, possibly next to nil, so a £10m breather is not that reassuring, is it? We do not really know what the monthly burn is either, I have asked but they declined to answer. Hopefully more news imminent, I hope it's good.

Slug’s got you worked out though Quady you spaniel

My email was escalated to Chris Stackhouse, he replied that Solgold complies with the current regulatory filings regarding financial disclosure and that they last filed on 14th February and the next reporting date is no later than 15th May. He would not reply on the current cash at bank or monthly spend saying he would not comment on anything not in the public domain. I have replied and asked if he could confirm that the major shareholders and Government are also therefore in the dark too? I shall let you know if he replies.

Agreed Orth, thank you.

i agree orth but they are really ******* me off now so i'm going to do my token effort to reciprocate.

I've decided to email Caldwell and Tuffold every four hours during business hours to request an up to date figure on cash at bank and the current monthly cash burn. Into day 2 and no reply as yet.

Spot on Madpunter, chronic over population, massive decline in wildlife, soil fertility, over farming, near death of our rivers with pesticides etc etc. The legacy media stubbornly refuse to acknowledge the link with the influx of people. The population increase has been an ecological disaster as far as I am concerned.

Sorry to post off Solgold.

Smart move him saying that.

Thanks, I'll email them, I have zero expectation of getting a meaningful response.

Hello BBG I had the email from Sean before Xmas inviting me to have a conversation. I've emailed him twice to arrange this but he has still not come back to me. I shall contact him again and make my point before. Does anyone know Scott Caldwell's email please?

it's frankly insulting to shareholder intelligence to tweet about how proud they are to be 'advancing' cascabel when they provide absolutely nothing to back it up, compounded by the open ended strategic review. we've had ******* all in terms of meaningful information. they haven't even got the gumption to realise it's a pr own goal, it is amateurish. solgold what the hell do you mean by 'advancing'? talk turkey for once please.

I got an email from Sean Tufford just before Christmas too. I did wonder if it was a fake but checked it out and seems legit. I emailed him back and await a reply or call. I shall let you know if I get anything of interest and he authorises me to post it.

Thanks Italian that was more informative than most Solgold presentations and a lot of the RNS's!

I thought SC said he had 17-19m odd shares too, or had he added since the 1m referred to?

Great find DBW, thanks! That’s a good start to the weekend!

Good point Snowman, I wonder it is possible they agreed to buy the shares immediately before signing the NDA?

That's exactly my understanding Sharketmare. SC expressly said various parties had signed NDAs and had access to the data room. His reply suggested to me at least that Jiangxi were one of them. He had the chance to say they were not, but just chose to say he couldn't disclose which parties had signed NDAs.

I was pleased with that overall. No bombshells and on the positive side:

Cash for a year provided there is no exploration.

SG has had good relations with all previous governments and expect this to continue with future ones.

SC has a lot of skin in this and seems very confortable living in Ecuador.

There is definitely an active data room.

There are a number of NDAs with various parties who have access to the data room – that must be third parties who therefore have access to confidential sensitive business information. This is excellent to hear categorically and well done to our man who gave those on this BB his brief on this a few weeks back.

This is conjecture but it seems Jiangxi are in the data room, he was very careful when answering about them.

Solgold are mine finders not builders. Solgold is not going to mine Cascabel.

It is as plain as a pike staff this is going to be sold.

Overall very positive in my view.

Possible blue day? Is that data room warming up?