RE: Ukog17 Apr 2020 01:00
Skwizz
I sit here reading your post, & myself see the fears, the potential & opportunities.
It is indeed a difficult one but to try & make sends of it.
If I put myself into SS position what do I see? I see a company which has 3 commercial layers with a completed EWT to which he will have done his own personnel CPR. He will see this HH site with HH1 HH2 drilled & at least HH1 flowing & some data from HH2 with 4 Kimmeridge wells to drill on this site & another number of potential sites within the HH licences with 86% currently owned & if it is believed successful would want 100%.
The majority of the current wells are from the Portland including the proposed IOW licences, but the key question is is the Kimmeridge.
The Next wells drilled at HH, Dunsfold & Aratton will not only a appraise the Portland but appraise the Kimmeridge as well.
These wells from the Portland are aimed to provide Net Assset Value & cash flow for the development of the Kimmeridge which UKOG has until 2022 to bring a field development plan to the OGA.
I ask myself if I was SS with the knowledge & experience that I have as the operator why would I want to publish a favorable CPR & then buy out the other partners & licence holders having given them that information raising the price of any buy out when my duty is to make the best decision for the company & it's shareholders.
I see PEDL234 with a well appraisal in planning for a appraisal of Dunsfold Portland & Kimmeridge layers & potential return to BB for a further Kimmeridge sidetraemployees ee Arreton is now in planning for 1 site with a 2nd site plans being finalized. Would I be putting these plans in place if I did not see them coming to fruition?
Many ask why SS does not take up options & make decisions based 100% on shareholder interests to raise the share price. ( My opinion is that he does look after shareholders interests which may seem surprising but for me the answer is that in the short medium or long term interest of shareholders? & if he was personally a shareholder would he take the decision on his personal short term interest or the companies & his long term interest?
This leads me to my next question which is as a result of the changes regarding corporate responsibility within UKOG & a renumeration committee being set up with a experienced non executive director who was the former finance director of Hurricane energy & Total, which is how should the CEO be rewarded for his achievement's over the last 18 months which was 2 years at the point of these report & accounts being published? (There seems to me a conflict of interests for the CEO's position regarding being a shareholder & making decisions at is stage. This is why I believe that SS has not taken up his options & let them lapse & been alternatively rewarded with a bonus & more options at a higher price for him & all UKOG employees for the future which in my opinion gives him not only a duty of care for shareholders but als