Member Info for wizard125

Wassels

As time goes by the problems at BB will hopefully just be remembered as a stumbling block along the way however painfully it may be at the present time.

Look at BP now after all the problems they have had or you can think where they may of been if they had not had the problems.

Setbacks happen all will come good imo.

Give it time.

This is great news the fact that up to 45% of the oil may be recoverable is a big step forward IMO. (DL comment I don't think it's tight at all!)

Looking at the bigger picture from the Portland alone of up to 5,000,000 barrels oil alone *$60 profit =$300,000,000 profit for starters & we have not touched the Kimmeridge yet with what percentage of oil recoverable yet alone gone to the 2 sites in 100% owned PEDL 234 or returned to BB or touched the IOW.

This is going to be very big imo.

With the dilution & share price rises since March I am in profit for approximately 25%.

SB

The $25 figure came from Vonk not necessarily applicable at HH.

Bladehater

I think that KL4 will continue to flow at a much higher level than KL3 especially when it is optimized even if it is from the same source as there seems a lot more pressure with the free flow which I presume is the gas in the oil raising it to the surface.

What I think maybe more interesting from the presentation link is the kimmeridge clays & the kimmeridge layers KL1 & KL2, blow the KL3 which sits at about 900m.

The drill at HH was to a depth of 1.7 miles approx 2.6km which has not yet been tested.

If it was over 5p again you would have missed it.

Here we go again the swing traders on a roll!

If there has been a 48 hour pressure test at HH.

I presume that started at midday on Saturday after the flare stack was still flaring & the last tanker left on Saturday morning.

Were the 2 tankers of oil that left this morning produced on Friday, Saturday or this morning as 3 tankers already left on Friday?

This looks like the production volume of oil has increased as the well is cleaning up or different chokes are used.

Sting69

I hope things are getting better at home and all was successful.

Rodders74

Maybe you should go & ask the Hurricane board how they got rid of Jaykay1.

Maybe be can then rid ourselves of this constant bickering from someone who is not invested.

Filter time I think.

Yawn, yawn, yawn!

CB1984

I think you are looking at things from out of perspective.

The 2.8p share price was achieved I think before the placingsb& purchases of a greater percentage of HH which has caused some dilution of UKOG but has added value & provided funding for planned operations until late 2019 by which time I hope that production will make us self funding.

The current share price seems lower than it was even with good news from the Portland & KL3 so far as there maybe thoughts of more % purchase of HHDL.

Despite the good news on flow rates this is not the bigger picture & the markets are waiting for commercial declarations & a CPR from the 3 horizons IMO.

Will

It has been said by SS himself that in his latest interview that they are going to build a tanker filling terminal in a semi circle so that drivers can drive in fill up & drive out cost approx 1 million maybe a little more.

I believe that in the scoping document the daily number of tanker movements is mentioned this may need to be revised should the expected flows rate numbers increase if this is acceptable for the transport plan.

If it was not acceptable to the council or the planners this may be a solution if it were possible under UK law.

My thoughts on larger tankers are already common practice in the Eu without Sting's perceived safety concerns and have the potential to cut the number of tanker runs by at least 1\3 & the associated costs.

Jaykay1

I have no idea as to the weight or length of a full tanker yet alone a tailor tanker.

My point was that they meet current Eu regulations & are in commercial use on Eu roads of which we are a member.

I think it is a valid point that HHDL & UKOG should consider as it has great potential for the company if it was viable & they have access to all the information to find out fairy quickly I should imagine.

I was not aware of the regulations that you posted hence finding it constructive.

Many thanks

I understand your point but think this what you are describing would be considered a wide load.

In Germany they also have many roundabouts these days obviously going right to left not left to right and there are no issues as far as I am aware and this is common practise not a special transport requirement.

The designs & construction of the lorries & trailer's must be commercially available.

My song for Adrian would be Its A Convoy.

10\4 Rubber Duck!

Can the fool on the hill @AdrianWfire help created a super tanker convoy for UKOG?

Thank you for a constructive reply JayKay1

That may be the case or Eu states maybe able to set there own rules as long as they can meet the turning circle rules.

Obviously the designs are in working practice within the Eu & meet Eu regulations as to if the Department of Transport will permit them under UK law now or in the future would be interesting to know as it has the potential to greatly increase the number of BOPD moved with the same number of tanker movements per day.

Sorry I am not on Twitter & don't know if DL would see it here so could someone ask DL about oil tankers used in Germany if not the whole EU & possibly America where they have a second oil tanker as a trailer tanker on the back of an oil tanker.

This has the potential to significantly reduce the number of tanker runs out of the sites and transport costs.

Not quite buy one get one free but if it was allowed under UK law it has great potential IMO.

Let me remind you in your own words.

'For the sport of it'

Always negative & not invested.

What for?