Member Info for winnings1

Correction - 'Freight-containers'

Somebody, a couple of days ago, mentioned that storage batteries would not cost a lot. That is far from the truth, the storage batteries SAE is talking about require a large investment, they come in the size of freight -contains, and many would be need to be installed.

Strangy83 - please don’t get rude, it is not becoming for an 83-year old person.

Excellent message by VeebleBobble yesterday 5.47pm. He has full understanding of the Energy situation.

Strangy83, have a read of that. . P.S. Does 83 stand for your age, not a touch of Alzheimer creeping in?

Strangy - You somehow have formed the opinion that I am against SAE. Stating the fact that Battery Storage is not the same as Energy Generation has none to do with Fishing, neither has my view that Fundraising is a likelihood. Setting up Battery Storage is hugely expensive and SAE shall be needing funds to do so. A successful fundraise will enhance SAE's prospects.

Now time for you to do a bit of DOYR.

Why this constant talk about electricity GENERATION on the Usk site.

There will not be GENERATION, there will be battery STORAGE of electricity drawn from the net.

Subsequent RELLEASE of the stored electricity during high demand, is not GENERATION.

Do I still need DYOR or have a made myself clear?

Strangy 83 - Just tell me where I am wrong, would be simplest of all.

I have been advised to DYOR, but why? I am merely saying that battery storage for subsequent release is not electricity Generation, it is making use of generated electricity - electricity produced by others.

As for possible fundraise, it often is the case that a fundraise is preceded by upbeat talk, especially so when the Company is burning cash.

I notice a slight retrace...before the next leg up.

All weaponry manufacturers are trading on very high PE-ratios. SAAB, for example, well into the thirties.

Geng - Please explain to me that electricity generation and battery storage are the same thing?

If you can’t, please can somebody else come forward. As far as I can see the Usk site is to be used for battery storage, not for electricity generation. Am I wrong on that?

Feels like a fundraise is on the horizon.

Besides that, I fail to understand how you generate power with battery storage. You absorb power into batteries to subsequently release it, that is not generating power!

Please tell me where I am wrong with this.

I have waited a long time for an outstanding company coming into my sight. Came across THEON yesterday, did not hesitate and bought a substantial chunk of the shares. The prospects for this company are purely excellent. The world needs weaponising big style. THEON will play an important and highly profitable role in that. Watch the share price take off…!

If there is/was really strong interest in the Taiwan operation, then why so long to reach a deal?

If you ask me, the whole thing sounds rather Iffy. The situation for IQE is quite desperate, IMHO.

This Loan Note business sounds desperate to me.

If the Taiwan asset sale fails, then the Company is heading for Receivership.

IMHO

MM cannot hold a price down or up, demand dictates the price / up or down

Revenue growth of 15% in the slow/difficult month of January bodes in my opinion well for the more active parts of the year.

Find me another Company with branded products and a sales growth rate in the region of 15% and a profit growth rate in ;the region of 25% on a PE Ratio of 20, and I shall invest! Let me hear, please.

Do not overlook the 'Improved Profit Margins'.

Somebody is going to have a long wait.

From current low of 400p, the likelihood of a reverse, as rise, any more now is distinct.

With sales growing at 15% but Profits simultaneously growing at 25-30%, the shares, now at 430p are a shouting Buy.

IMO