Member Info for Wilson63

Well dogs had a huge walk and it's a rainy bank holiday so had a rummage about and this got me interested

https://www.linkedin.com/posts/tiago-justo-070781b2_rangertech-lightbench-activity-7198311289234849792-fyVG

Seems a fairly aggressive play to me, must be confident.

Lots of videos for more scientific

https://sagescience.com/product-support/pippin-prep-support/

And of course lightbench

https://www.google.com/search?q=lightbench+yourgene+video&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&hl=en-gb&client=safari

Good to see as ever Larrys video choice is excellent, as an aside Tks to him and Kilkenny ted for the twitter posting

https://x.com/Larry64450205/status/1793319937831825823

Hi karaen correct, I just thought that would sound a bit weird to say for some reason in the discussion .

CS

https://uk.linkedin.com/in/andrew-birnie-11847baa

involved in co prep, hardly posts anywhere , what I'm driving at is the company feel it's important for this statement to be admissible as I'd presume our expert has came down on the side of viscocity which would not be helpful to us if you see what I mean.

CS well the judge appears to place some relevance on it

"Further factual evidence

That leaves one further matter on which I have not been specifically addressed, namely the third statement of Dr. Birnie. I have read that statement. It does, I think, veer into areas of opinion, but that is a matter that I can take into account in terms of the weight of the evidence when it comes to trial. The principal reason for relying on that evidence is to refute the suggestion that the optimiser is a viscous liquid and it seems to me that at this stage before trial it is entirely proper that that issue, which the defendants say with some justification they had not anticipated having to address, should be addressed by the further short statement that they wish to rely on. I will give permission for them to do so at trial."

CS I understand that but there's obviously a discussion to be had regarding the viscosity!! otherwise Andrew Birnie wouldn't be providing a statement on that subject.

Https://fluid-dynamics.leeds.ac.uk/research/outreach/learn-more-about-fluid-dynamics/viscosity/

Wonder how Andrew Birnie describes exsig honey or water.

Gizmo what role would Mr Rees(presuming you mean new Ceo) have at court.....curious.

Who would have thought that such an important part of the defence was our very own Andrew Birnies statement

"That leaves one further matter on which I have not been specifically addressed, namely the third statement of Dr. Birnie. I have read that statement. It does, I think, veer into areas of opinion, but that is a matter that I can take into account in terms of the weight of the evidence when it comes to trial. The principal reason for relying on that evidence is to refute the suggestion that the optimiser is a viscous liquid and it seems to me that at this stage before trial it is entirely proper that that issue, which the defendants say with some justification they had not anticipated having to address, should be addressed by the further short statement that they wish to rely on. I will give permission for them to do so at trial"

Harchris I k ow I was rather hoping to preempt Dazermans Rns prediction for the morning:)), although I'd be surprised if it arrived on a Friday.

Interesting read with a bit of ebb and flo, really pleased Dr Owens report allowed and last day for claimants expert submissions tomorrow, clock well and truly ticking now.

Trading update pse.

Tks to Kilkenny ted

https://twitter.com/KilkennyTed/status/1790784600559542657

Seems such a long time ago since I saw one in the "flesh" at NEC, ultimate in soft launch.

Also, remember the JM(I think) comment that Novacyt through our bioinformatics programme had sight of what a lot of others products could do/were like.

KT I'm sure we all remember a couple of twitter posts from people on the front line saying they didn't have enough time and our test was time consuming, but I don't recall"inaccurate " statements.

Nice when laid out like that Terry, I'm also working on the assumption Mobileye know a thing or two, back to lurking Gla.

Blimey Baxter on the positive trail some others not posting as yet today.

Shout out to brockl who said quote

"220,000 won't cut it from auto. Needs to be 300k minimum."

Nailed it.))))))

Hi Surfie I blocked that poster many months ago, recently piecing together other reply's to said poster I understand they were only quoting nova/primer revenues and not yourgene.

Of course that may be wrong but frankly I don't care.

Obviously not a dig at you:))

Court.

I think I'm one of a few that has stayed that for months, B2 has listed it far more eloquently than me although JW has been in our firing line for a while, he's going to want to show he's done his fiduciary duty.

Hi Brockwl you said

"Useful contract today adding 3m a year for some time starting eoy."

Did you miss out the word "Min" after 3m?

Enjoy your Labour Day Larry, thanks for the article.

I'm with JW and Mr Twitter unless we accept less and get lightbench all over the NHS.))