This article is interesting as it shows that even Landlords are considered to be shareholders. If this action is repeated globally, Cineworld will be in big trouble:
Please can someone explain to me how the sale of the group as a whole (excluding Cineworld) would result in a significant share dilution? Surely the point of any sale process is to maximise the valuation for the selling party i.e. Cineworld in this context and therefore shareholders or am I not understanding something here?
My personal view is that they are trying to gauge interest in their assets in order to buy time to get this company back on track. If all cinema's are in the same position as cinrworld financially then they will most likely struggle to find a buyer and will need to find a buyer from outside the theatre business altogether. My personal view is that if they fail to find a buyer then they can demonstrate to the judges that their plans are the best in town and they may get a stay of execution