RE: More on todays Telegraph.14 Sep 2020 02:40
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/amp/health-53131237
Full article in link above. From 21st June 2020.
Below are some parts from the article that I've highlighted that speak out to me about trials back in June in Southampton. All my own opinions here of course, since we’ve had no RNS. DYOR.
Participants in the trial, which will include some university staff and students, "will provide weekly saliva samples for lab testing." (Spit in a pot perhaps?)
”The kit will be delivered to their home or workplace” and then ”collected by staff working for the trial team” or returned to an agreed location." (deliver spit in a pot kits to participants & later take spit in a pot samples back to ”trial team” at labs?)
Health Secretary Matt Han**** said he was grateful to everyone involved in the trial: "Saliva testing could potentially make it easier for people to take coronavirus tests at home, without having to use swabs. ”This trial ”will also help us learn” if routine, ”at-home testing could pick up” cases of the virus earlier." (Objective- to see if saliva works better than swabs & if so, it ”could” mean at-home testing instead of lab testing?)
The saliva test looks for genetic material of the virus using a technique known as loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP). (Spit in a pot samples tested here first in their labs, perhaps, to see if saliva sampling works from spit in a pots to detect virus?)
”Experts say this can be simpler and faster to carry out than the standard polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing method used to analyse coronavirus swabs.”
"Ultimately, it ”might be” possible to do ”the testing” ”as well as” ”the sampling at home” and get results in under an hour."
"As well as trialling the Optigene saliva test, "the Southampton team" ”are exploring” the ”use of other no-swab saliva-based coronavirus tests” with companies including Chronomics, Avacta, MAP Science and Oxford Nanoimaging."
(Could it be that ”Optigenes saliva test” is actually about taking spit in a pot samples back to their labs to be run through LAMP to see if saliva works better than PCR swabs & if so, then in addition to a positive outcome, the "Southampton Team", also then explores the use of saliva, from spit in a pot samples, on other "no-swab saliva-based tests" supplied by the other 4 companies mentioned, BUT they explore this possibility in their own labs to see if ”at-home testing & sampling” can work to take us away from swab testing?).
Personally, I still need an RNS to confirm if this could be what's happened & obviously don't know how Avacta compared with other 3 companies. This is all just my own opinions/thinking from what I've read in this article & no more. I could be wrong. Do your own research to form ones own conclusions.