RE: Put up or Shut up deadline.18 Mar 2025 08:28
@evans
Yes, Wood Group and Sidara could form a Joint Venture as an alternative to a full acquisition. This could allow Sidara to gain strategic influence while helping WG stabilize financially. If WG wants to remain independent while solving its cash flow issues, a JV is a smart option. But Sidara’s willingness depends on whether it prefers full control or just a strategic foothold.
Potential JV Structure
1. Ownership Split
Sidara and WG could co-own the JV (e.g., 50/50 or 60/40).
Sidara injects capital (£420M or more) to fund the JV’s operations and future projects.
2. Scope of the JV
Energy Transition & Sustainability: Focus on carbon capture, hydrogen, or renewables, leveraging Sidara’s capital and WG’s engineering expertise.
Middle East Expansion: Use WG’s services and Sidara’s regional presence to win contracts.
Infrastructure & Asset Management: Develop and operate energy assets together.
3. Governance & Control
Sidara gets a board seat at the JV level but doesn’t control WG fully.
Profits from the JV could be shared as dividends, helping WG’s cash flow.
Pros & Cons of a JV Approach
✔ Less risky than full acquisition → Sidara gets exposure without full ownership risk.
✔ Supports WG’s financial recovery → Fresh capital without excessive dilution.
✔ Growth synergies → Access to Sidara’s contracts, capital, and market presence.
✔ Favorable to shareholders → WG retains independence while securing a strategic partnership.
Would This Be a Good Move?