Member Info for Whisp3rs39

The £20m should be enough to fund phase 3 lupus but if IMM want to prove up the other 50 or so autoimmune diseases or have proof of concept, its going to cost a heck of a lot more than £20m. This may be where a problem exists between Avion, IMM & potential partners.

I heard in the interviews about deals (multiple), I took this as possibly regional, US, EU, Asia or US & rest of world. Not sure I heard single global partner mentioned but could be wrong without watching them again.

Personally I think Tim made us look vulnerable & desperate and it was completely avoidable. Got far too excited, over promised, under delivered then got bailed out by Lanstead with Kapi. Last I'll be posting about Tim unless something happens, dont want to fill board with negativity when I actually believe in IMM.

Gla

I'd say that's an unknown tbf, not sure if it would be good or bad before deal as we don't know where we currently are in these discussions/negotiations atm. Certainly after a deal we should be hoping for a change up top. Getting this deal over the line will not be enough credit now, that's allocated to the science, imo. But I hear you, it could be another unnecessary delay, all depends whats happening behind closed doors.

Good post msuk... I do hope nobody is here with cash they are absolutely relying on. I can afford to loose it all, been tied up for months and foods still on table so all good. Obviously, would still hurt alot but mostly pride & a very expensive lesson.

Still positive here though, don't think any shenanigans are going off, just Tim being a sales man but poor CEO/Chairman. If Tim hadn't messed up last year giving his deluded time frame, the time frame for a deal we should have predicted would be to back end of this year/early next year, 12-18 month negotiating & ironing out legals. For me, It was a huge mistake by Tim and he should go because of it, complete lack of competency. I hope the science itself will be something big pharma can't afford to ignore and a battle for it should begin at some point if so. Until then, we sit and wait for P140 deal, phase 3, &/or Kapi news.

Upside here far outweighs what I'm willing to loose.

Gla. All imo.

Very plausible... 70p+ for takeover? Tim stated many times it will be a partnering deal but not taking his word for it.

Sure I seen Avion started procedures with FDA in March for Phase 3 re-trial? Should hopefully have some news on that soon. Again, how did Tim think this could be wrapped up by 2025. As much as I still believe IMM have something, Tim as CEO & Chairman is a problem that needs fixing asap. Checks and balances comes to mind.

Gla

I see what you're referring to now, Luca & Associates? Please correct me if wrong or if ive blatantly missed something... has Elizabeth Zimmer sold the shares moved from Luca?

Apologies I was referring to Dimitri Dimitriou.. 😠😂

He sold most back in 2009, do you know when he sold the rest? Believe he had 1.5% or less by 2021, far less than landsteads swings since then. Too many plausible reasons with different circumstances to take into consideration to be a outright red flag, imo. Although current team should have had more skin in game before discussions started. Fortunately (i hope), it's the science I believe in and the growing possible chance a big pharma will pay to find out & take this over the line, hopefully the science shouts and negotiates better than anyone could do. But yep, what will be will be...

Gla

Thats how i read it spantrout, the three interviews leading upto Christmas was as good as a promise and a big reason why so many who hadn't seen IMM before took a position, imo. I still believe IMM has valuable assets but faith in Tim has all but gone.

If he didn't intentionally mislead investors (i don't believe he did but been wrong many times before), it has highlighted a serious defect in Tim as a CEO. I wrongly assumed due to the short time frame that discussions had already been ongoing for months before patent filing. Now it's apparent those discussions wasnt happening to the level we was lead to believe or nowhere near close enough to finalise a deal by Q1 2026, Tim has some explaining to do. Why did he think it was wise to go public and state deal by year end, with other happy surprises, if no 'negotiations' had even started along with no good surprises delieved in 2025? Why hasn't any sort of deal materialised? Is he willing to accept a lower deal to finalise it and secure the company for many years to come?

Imo, everyone is wanted the £1bn+ package deal, I would be happy with half of that, still 5-10% royalties. The company would be sured up for the long term future and able to focus on other assets or partnering opportunities, along with a sp of 35p+.

If the assets we have are correct, this stock should be in people's retirement portfolio, big gains will be made trading the way up, but true wealth should be created holding 7+ years after commercialisation.

Gla, I do believe & keep adding when I can but for me Tim should be some sort of Operations Manager not CEO. No doubt he has done good since taking over but this saga is all his doing and was completely avoidable. If what we have is correct, we need a much more competent CEO, possibly an understudy manager from one of the big pharma wanting to make a name for him/herself. Sorry this isn't all positive, really not putting IMM as a company down, just wanting the best team in place to look after my retirement fund hopefully.

Laura is already in the bin for over cheerleading and putting anyone who doesn't agree in the bin. I don't think she is intentionally misleading though but rather over expressing too much excitment without clarity.

However, £1.40 area is potentially on the cards & a big reason why I'm here. Projected mcap from projected market share, £1bn+ deal, 5-10% royalty plus other products 'if' true & all goes well, would end up in that region in 7-10 years, if product goes to market, imo. Detailed future costs not included.

Please don't jump to conclusions as you have in last post. My posts are intentionally long as I don't want to unintentionally mislead.

Can't really argue with most of your posts musk, from what ive seen you've unfortunately been fairly accurate but I get your views have been related to charts/volume only.

However, people talking up or down and their motives isn't just about moving price, this place is quick information gathering on current status essentially but people will wrongly make decisions off the back of it or use it to create a general consensus. If someone doesn't believe in IMM but constantly talking it up, we'd know that to be a crook, avoid at all cost! I have way more of those in the green bin than those unnecessary trashing. Good to constantly keep a look out for posters motives though to find and avoid those having no common decency and have a feed of more valuable information, for, against or just information. Fortunately, jux seems to be someone talking it down when actually believing IMM has something to offer, only missed opportunities is the casualty there but still has to go in Laura's green bin.

Though posting on here can't shift a share in the way we're wanting, imo. It's still real people's cash we're potentially missguiding. While there's no law against cheerleading or trash talking, still nice to get those with hidden agendas to voluntarily expose themselves.

Since you're the chart guy though musk, would you say this bottomed out at 4?

That's quite the admission... not that I take investing advice from here but your opinion is now one sure to be ignored. Have a nice day.

Whats your position here Jux?

Proved? And another thinking their opinion is nailed on facts... good to know what intellectual level we're in company of. Just because our orange faced 'friend' over the pond doesnt understand how to apply English and gets away with it, doesn't mean we have to follow.

FYI, I'm all for balance views while keeping facts and opinions separated.

All you have to do is change a few words here and there for clarity then mutual respect will blossom, whether people agree or not. Simple yes?

Gla, time to enjoy the weekend.

Maybe because you're a polar hypocrite Mike. Having a little hissy fit about those being positive while stating your own made up facts of 'zero' something... (can't quite remember what you was adamant about). Stating your opinion as facts, that's why your post was removed.

Do gooders or those that do not agree with you don't control these boards, walk away from the keyboard, wobble head, smile and enjoy the day...

Gla lth.

MrRSoul,

As much at Tim has majority blame for current sp, AIM MM's are making trades difficult to read... showing trades at 4.31 as a sell (when we've been at 4.25/29 all day) then the UT trade @ 4.17 as a buy, only minutes apart on low trade count. Was over £12k buys yesterday at one point but only showing £2kish as buys due to spread changes as trades taking place. AIM MM's need looking at, they offer a valuable service but don't half get away with some shenanigans.

Volume per trade is noticeably bigger after that trade, a few have followed for sure. Fingers crossed the start of an ongoing increase.

Gla.

Nettles, even with no news, you're still one of the good one's here.

Sellers done? L2 switched up. Hole1 Assays due soon, always thought they would do a 2 part RNS with the worst first.

Doing the interview before release of news could cover possible allegations of insider trading between now and then, maybe they got forced into doing one? I don't know. If they don't have complete information to RNS yet but information is known & funds are ready, a interview is certainly easier and more flexible than wording an RNS and risk tanking the sp thought bad wording.

Certainly wasn't expecting an interview though or for it to be such a catalyst, which makes me also think some other lines were dropped intentionally that can't be RNS'd, maybe a hat tip to Newmont JV discussions ongoing depending results, i ask?

GLA.