Member Info for WHamBoy

Doesn't look good so far does it. I suppose we should give this some time to see if anyone else responds.

The good thing about recommending posts is that you can always remove your recommendation at a later stage, thereby deleting any record of your stated views even further. Hopefully more people will be able to share their views with this in mind.

Please “recommend” if you have seen the Deloitte report and it is NEUTRAL news for shareholders.

Obviously only “recommend” if you have seen the report😀

Please “recommend” if you have seen the Deloitte report and it is BAD news for shareholders.

Obviously only “recommend” if you have seen the report😀

Please “recommend” if you have seen the Deloitte report and it is GOOD news for shareholders.

Obviously only “recommend” if you have seen the report😀

Please “recommend” if you have seen the Deloitte report and it is NEUTRAL for shareholders.

Obviously only “recommend” if you have seen the report😀

Please “recommend” if you have seen the Deloitte report and it is BAD news for shareholders.

Obviously only “recommend” if you have seen the report😀

Please “recommend” if you have seen the Deloitte report and it is GOOD news for shareholders.

Obviously only “recommend” if you have seen the report😀

Thanks Jim. Just asked HL for a copy.

In the meantime I reckon we can avoid confidentiality rules by offering those who have seen the report the chance to “recommend” one of my next three posts. One will say that “I have seen the report and it is good news for shareholders “, a 2nd will say its neutral and a third that it’s bad. Obviously only “recommend” if you have seen the report😀

Perhaps after a few clicks, it will be clearer for the rest of us which way the wind is blowing…

I’m with HL so will have to wait until they send me the report. In the meantime I’m heartened to be told that shareholders should read it: it suggests good news to me.

If there is an NDA in place, then we can assume that it also applies to SN and by implication to Looed as well.

March 14th!

So is our next “big moment” coming on March 12th? Is that how long we’re going to have to wait?

I’m sure I’m not the only one hoping that Looed’s present silence is because a deal is close……

Thanks Looed. It seems likely to me then that it was in Mourant’s interests and our interests to move YA out of the way by forcing the liquidation, knowing that we could then go back to Deloitte to offer a compromise deal. YA obviously wanted too big a chunk of the pie.

I certainly haven’t written this off yet and am hoping the company’s efforts and your efforts will ultimately prove to be rewarding for us all. Thanks for all your hard work.

Thanks Looed. I took your message yesterday as being a positive, and whilst we are still very much in the dark, we seem to be nearing some kind of resolution.

Can I just ask a question please? Now that Deloitte are in charge, do they have to listen to all creditors before making decisions, or can they effectively ignore YA now and move ahead with getting the best possible deal for all? I’m presuming it’s the 2nd option, but I honestly don’t know!

Cheers tsbs1

Tenners and Phil

As a shareholder I want to completely distance myself from what you doing. I believe it could be damaging to my interests and want no part of it. I will not debate this with you any further, so please do not reply.

Thank you Looed. Your continuing support is much appreciated. It’s good to know that the company is still on our side. I suppose we all want this to draw to a positive solution as quickly as possible, but in the meantime, once again, thank you.

i’d love to get some “dough” back here ****nal 😀

Well spotted Looed. “In a constructive manner” implies to me that they are making progress in their efforts 😀.

I’m really pleased they’re still talking to us via you.

Thanks again.