Member Info for WeTookPelham

?

And that was 'after' the big rise during the day?

That tweet is kind of interesting as it's seems quite unusual for Scancell to do one when they are actually at a/the conference, no? Also they are not specifying why they are there?
But also because it seems like they've been reading these posts with our moaning perhaps too :)

P.s. RE (Regarding/Referencing!) abbreviations - Joking aside, I also think it is useful if less abbreviations are used, especially for newbie private investors (PI's), of which there seems to be a few more in the last few days(?). There's already lots of jargon to contend with just the science side of things! Just IMO (in my opinion :)).

BioEurope Conference/Crumbs - "...Well, do not think we are presenting so more about meetings as it is MORE A DEAL MAKING EVENT than a science event there are a great many big players there and BioNTech are of course there too... so hopefully, some fruitful continental breakfast conversations are taking place :)"

I like that bit you said crumbs that I've upper cased!

Do we know if they have attended before? And is it possible to tell who is an exhibitor or a sponsor there? Because as you say it's a veritable who's who of big pharma! For a change I don't mind that there was no RNS re Scancells attendance prior if the there is a nice interesting RNS post the conference, if you get my drift :)

WF, as I'm very much a newbie in the dark arts of the market makers (and keen to learn more), I'm really curious to know what your inferring from your post about those big sells and buy. Is it simply the size thats of interest or the fact the sells were followed immediately by the buy? What does that indicate exactly?

Sorry, yes Nigel Somerville, I said it wrong twice! TW isn't a fan of Scancell at all if i remember correctly.

Ray, had they worded the RNS a similar way to the way crumbs just did in his post it the share price might have actually gone up! Instead it went down because the Board seem to like down selling themselves/putting a negative slant on things when they are actually very positive...IMO. And as C7 says it was nastily twisted by others, although how much of an affect that had we can't say.

I am going slightly off topic, but it is very very frustrating the board can't seem to do these very little things, to the detriment of us long term private investors. But.....as the Tom Winnifrith post says, ""..There really does (NOW FINALLY) seem to be much to look forward to"!!! :)

Apologies Crumbs, I stand corrected RE the batch of SCIB1, like you say it was actually a sign of incredible success with SCIB1, but if I remember correctly the wording of the RNS at the time was horrendous and negative IMO and it sent the SP tanking down completely unnecessarily.
I know many of you don't seem to think it is "that" important for a cutting edge/game changing bio company, but their handling of PR is absolutely atrocious IMO.

As Tom Winnifrith says "...the general run of bad news (some self-inflicted, such as leaving a placing too late) ", and that's the frustrating and key thing for me, as a "lot" of this was self inflicted by the Board of Directors IMO. And I for one am glad they got somewhat of a hard time at the AGM, they deserved it...IMO. Lets not forget when they let the SCIB1 vaccine batch expire! And the unnecessarily negative wording in the accompanying RNS. And more recently not pushing the CICON18 attendance, Ichor FDA etc etc. I could go on!

But yes.....moaning aside! An excellent summary nonetheless. And as he finishes "..There really does seem to be much to look forward to" Hopefully now, finally, it's all upside!!! Ichor/FDA issues could be solved by December (fingers crossed), Cancer Research UK Grand Challenge in January.

I just wished I'd bought all my shares now at this silly low price and not years ago! 8p does seem absolutley incredible value just for the intellectual property alone, let alone partnership/deal potential
(P.S. did someone do some Technical Analysis of the current share price recently?)

Definitely a buy? Delayed from yesterday morning, looks to be the buy price at the time? If it was a buy, whoever bought that many at that price is a jammie Dodger IMO! Very jealous!

Hi Botski, are you talking about the proactive event or the AGM?

...fyi. Buys? Sells? Not delayed? Who knows lol.

Ah sorry Bob, I see what you mean, the price was 7.9 at that time yesterday! So conceivably they were buys then.

Well done Bob! A lot of shares at a bargain price IMO. Although that doesn't explain the the other 2 X 437500 trades?
P.S....Couldn't lend us a fiver could you? :)

I don't think the 16:28 hrs one was delayed, was it? Should we assume all three are buys?
Either way volume is definitely up this week!

...delayed from yesterday 11.20am(ish), buys or sells? Can anyone confirm? Also these are exactly the same number of shares as the biggie trade from near close play last night too?

Well said Konar, in full agreement with your points, particularly "AIM that it doesn't take much sentiment change to have a big swing in the price, either positively or negatively". For example it took Scrumpy to tweet about the presentation slides at CICON18, why didn't SCLP tweet or RNS them themselves? I even emailed them to question why their twitter person wasn't even adding the #CICON18 hash tag to the few tweets that they did do at the time! It would have helped gain traction with the huge attention the event was getting. Plus there were news items around CICON18 time that IMO they should have RNS'd but didn't etc etc. The current SP is a joke and yes the BOD should be doing more about it by simply improving those little things you mentioned Konar, IMO.

Like you I would like to sell my shares when the company sells lock stock for a considerable amount, but to any of the attendees yesterday, was there any hints/clues/winks by the BOD that selling outright is still a possibility? Obviously they can't say anything substantial on the matter and i get that it's more likely the different platforms will "sold"/partnered individually .

Also was Richard Goodfellow in attendance?

Many thanks Steve67 and BobBust for summarising your findings today, much appreciated.

Steve67, I kinow you'll be posting a video, but....(lol) you said in reference to Moditope: " Lindy is working closely with BioNTech .. they want to see Moditope work but also want to beat big(ger) pharma to a deal when it does ... first deal here IMO! " Can you expand on this at all, how closely are they working? And are BioNTech even big enough for a deal? Any of the big(ger) pharma will have way more clout than BioNTech, no? Or we talking more of a partnership? Also was there any more big pharma name dropping by Lindy?

RE Modi1: Any idea of the new manufacturing timescales?

RE SCIB1 - So just the one query in the hands of Scancell then, any idea what that was? And did you get the impression the Ichor side of it would be dealt with by December too?

Just before the end of play....A buy? If so someone liked what they heard perhaps!?

While we're all eagerly awaiting some kind of updates from the AGM, can someone please remind me when the proactive presentation(?) is again?