Ben Richardson, CEO at SulNOx, confident they can cost-effectively decarbonise commercial shipping. Watch the video here.
Here is an very interesting discussion about the oilmarket manipulation.
I think this explanation is close to the truth:
Think in terms of the 2008 housing market crisis. The brokers make a lot of money for every loan they made, so there is no reason for them NOT to make the loan as long as they can check all of the boxes to get it signed, sealed and delivered. Bad loans become good loans when insurance is placed onto them so as to boost their credit rating. Once the credit rating is boosted, this allows private investors as well as institutional investors (like retirement funds, hedge funds, banks themselves using customer savings and deposits) to buy those loans at a high price from the people who know they are worthless loans (to get those bad loans off of their books), just like @Dan Warnick said. But doesn't this put the insurance companies at great risk? Of course it does, but since they are not regulated in the same way as banks and securities, they are allowed to be over-leveraged, which means they make huge amounts of cash until bankruptcy stops it all. Although the assets of the insurance companies are lost in bankruptcy, the top dogs get to keep all of the millions they "earned" in salaries and bonuses. Moreover, since this whole scheme was founded on the fact that bad loans were made that cannot be repaid, the people who orchestrated the scheme in the first place know to short those oil companies, allowing them to make billions of dollars as the stock prices of those oil companies crash; then they use that cash from the short positions to buy up all of the oil companies' assets at rock-bottom prices during bankruptcy proceedings.
This scheme has been around since Nathan Rothschild did it back during the Napoleon wars, and they and others have continued to do it since. It is the average person who loses. They lose not only their jobs but also their tax dollars, because the government will be forced to bail everyone out. Although there is no legitimate reason to bail every one out (there are actually good reasons not to: see Sal Khan's ideas during the housing crisis), the people who rigged the whole scheme in the first place will then use their excess wealth to buy votes in Congress. After all, there is a very very important reason why every major political candidate has a "Foundation" that allows unlimited donations...and it has nothing to do with "philanthropy." Getting that money out of the foundation and into the pocket of the politician is a bit more complicated, but you can rest assured, they have figured that one out as well.
https://community.oilprice.com/topic/3837-us-shale-oil-debt-deep-the-denial/
http://otp.investis.com/generic/regulatory-story.aspx?cid=201&newsid=1201333
Pr-department seem to have new life on facebook :p
http://www.enquest.com/media-centre/press-releases/2018/ship-to-ship-transfer.aspx
https://www.offshoreenergytoday.com/bumi-armada-refunds-enquest-for-kraken-fpso/
https://www.msn.com/en-sg/finance/topstories/barakah-offshore-bags-pan-msia-mcm-contract/ar-BBLfMqJ
https://www.londonstockexchange.com/exchange/news/alliance-news/detail/1531126306836813600.html
CANACCORD RAISES ENQUEST ENERGY TO 'SPECULATIVE BUY' ('HOLD')
https://www.avanza.se/placera/telegram/2018/07/05/enquest-barclays-hojer-rek-till-overvikt-undervikt.html
Barclays raising targets to 0.58£, up 8% in Stockholm.
https://www.avanza.se/placera/forum/forum/enquest.html
Barclays