Member Info for Wb20

Depends whether he was a ‘good leaver’ or ‘bad leaver’. There will be clauses specific to his role and contract with RMS.

He made something like £4M Anyway, so I don’t think he will care too much is he loses out on a few hundred k. He got a bloody good deal!

https://www.dcslegal.com/news-and-insights/good-leaverbad-leaver-provisions-–-what-are-they-and-why-do-they-matter

Answered today 23.12.20

Question for Department of Health and Social Care
NHS and Social Services: Protective Clothing
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what assessment he has made of the potential merits of using anti-viral face masks in the NHS and social care settings.
Asked 24 November 2020
The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) regulates ‘face masks’ that are medical devices, those intended to be used in a clinical/health care setting for the protection of the patient rather than the wearer. The MHRA has not conducted or participated in an assessment of anti-viral medical face masks for use in a health care setting.
NHS England and NHS Improvement have been approached by a number of suppliers claiming to have products or technologies with anti-viral properties. The Innovation and Sustainability Team within NHS England and NHS Improvement are currently looking into these claims and their potential application across a range of items.

I’m quite sure Gareth is the ‘inventor’ and Nottingham Trent own the patent.

Manifesto, where do you find this information? Thanks

Email sent - 1.75M shares in support

What do we think will happen to the SP if the Volz contract is for say 2-3M rather than 5-10M+ as some are expecting? 2-3M is still clearly a positive, but I’m curious whether this could be viewed negatively and limit any rise in SP. It’s a possibility, so worth discussing.

There’s no riddles here, calm yourself down. I’m down way more than I can afford on this at the moment and it doesn’t feel great. Just trying to offer a bit of hope for people. Fair comment on it being either BS or embarrassing, can’t deny that. I’ll leave it there as I cba with any conflict. I’ll continue to watch from the sidelines and wish you well

Cheers for your input hopsta.

Nofookinfear, I completely understand why you would think that and I can only apologise if I have come across unfavourably. For legal reasons (NDA) I cannot provide or explain this information, so all I can offer is my opinions on P2F albeit vague, and hope that my previous posts confirm sincerity. To be honest, I’m barking up the wrong tree as I have nothing to gain from this conversation and actually more to lose. I just hate to see the bitterness. I’ll be transparent and tell you I’ve only invested for the last year, made some great calls too due to some diligent research, but this particular share and share chat are really putting me off despite the potential great opportunity in front of us. It’s a shame there as so many poisonous individuals here. Bring back lottohopes et al!

Therein lies my concern, although my concern lies ONLY in my lack of understanding. There could very easily be a reasonable explanation and very positive movements in that regard, but of course having no visibility makes the mind run in circles and people jump to conclusions, one way or another. So yes, I agree, the BOD’s actions are far from ideal, but until news around this is released I will reserve judgement for better or for worse. P2F should not be in the firing line, thats the only piece of information I can back with 100% confidence

I’m happy to state that you are wrong and I know that for a fact. Simple as that. I’ve spoken to an investor on here privately tonight who will I’m sure vouch for my authenticity - I am just as nervous about the BOD as the next person, but with regard to P2F and their progress / trajectory, I am in receipt of knowledge that cannot be disputed though cannot be shared for legal reasons. Which I realise sounds like absolute BS. Not my problem though. I am a sincere person and a genuine investor (again, that has been vouched for tonight). Just please sit back and wait for news, or sell if you cannot stand the turbulence until then.

Profitseeker - i’ve just followed you on Twitter. Follow back as I’d like to private DM. All good, just after an honest chat. Likewise with any other genuine investor. Also, will confirm that I have a holding of £52k and I am confident with the investment. Some utter drivel on here now, almost worthless reading. @lottohopes, where are you! One of the only decent posters here

Hi all, the post in question below was from me and it’s absolutely the truth, copied and pasted straight from the email. Without a background in manufacturing I don’t personally understand what a ‘line’ constitutes, and whether they are repurposing an existing ‘line’ with new machinery to enable mask production. In any case, I have spoken with P2F since (see my later posts about introductions) and have signed an NDA to progress these introductions. For obvious reasons I cannot state anything further, so make of this what you will, but it’s a firm hold for me.

UT - 89,999 shares @ 2.76

I’m assuming weather geek is a bit of a bell*** so will take that as a dig. Just someone trying to make a bit of cash, and thinks things through a little more carefully than a lot of the content providers on this board. It’s not a Sunday league WhatsApp group which is what it seems to have become, it’s a forum for genuine discussion for genuine holders who want to know what’s going on, remember that.

Montyboz, lots on your plate then! I completed my PhD a few years ago, not for the faint hearted! Hah

As an active researcher and a critical thinker, what are your genuine take always on the goings on right now? I can’t see anything untoward happening with GC at the helm, it’s not worth his academic credibility, never mind the fact he seems like a stand up guy. But legal loopholes can and do surface, especially where greed is involved (I’m not talking about GC for the record).

Keen to hear your take? I’m speaking with my business partner who is a retired corporate lawyer at 3PM, so I will have all the answers I/we need after that I’m sure.

I think my main question is - can shares in RMS reach dizzy heights, or will P2F be sold before then, and if so, how does that happen and what does it look like for us. Volz seems like the natural vehicle to push P2F. Assuming that does transpire, I would guess it will be well before RMS reaches 30p+ So that the sale is cost effective for the buyer. If it doesn’t, then happy days for us all!

For the record, I hope and also (mostly) believe that you are right, but your blatant disregard for others opinions and an unwillingness to discuss possible outcomes to make the most informed decisions where people’s hard earned cash is at stake, on a share chat board no less, tells me a lot. Each to their own. I’m a scientist myself with many publications, and thusly research everything I do. My optimism outweighs the possible negatives here, but my advice to you lefthandgolfer is do not be shortsighted, here or in any of your investments. This is a game not to be played with emotion, explore facts and make an informed decision.

I’m sure we won’t see eye to eye, and that’s ok. But for other investors who read this, please do your due diligence if you have hard earned cash tied up.

Here’s to an exciting week and hopefully some huge things to come.

I don’t think the masks are any longer an issue, it’s pretty concrete that we need them and that these are the most advanced (patented) and cost efficient out there!

The concerns I and many other investors have is with this potential acquisition and what it means for the shareholders. The product is proven, contracts are in place, but this unusual buying needs to be fully explored and fully explained. It could be completely fine, and I hope it is, but as an investor you have to ask difficult questions to ensure your investment choice is wise. It’s no good just shooting people down for asking genuine questions, what is the point in a share discussion if all you get in return is f*****g deramper this or ramper that, absolutely pointless. Discussing the facts in front of us and exploring all possibilities is exactly what we should be doing. Stop being aggressive and short sighted, we’re all here to make money.

The takeover code here - https://www.thetakeoverpanel.org.uk/the-code/download-code

As explained by geordie earlier and yesterday this makes sense, if they acquire over 30% they must offer to pay for our shares at the value of the highest price they paid. That’s the law. But I have no idea on the legality of pooling shares with GC or other shareholders to take a >50% stake and force a sale, and being a subsidiary of the parent company RMS. the shareholders would not be entitled to remuneration. These are all the things we should be discussing, however likely or unlikely.

Whether right or wrong (that’s why we should discuss, not just shout down) I foresee a barrage of abuse for this post given the ‘quality’ of posters on this board, so I’m going to keep digging in to my own research and leave it be.

I’m invested, and excited, but also unsure about all of this ambiguity right now which makes me uneasy, especially without the skillsets to pick things apart from a legal standpoint.

Anyway, enjoy your weekends and DYOR.

Message from my manufacturer - “if it does you'll get much more than that” (I asked for a bottle of wine as payment if it worked out). “No but seriously we are making masks as I am sure you know. And it's aalready a premium mask in the market. If we can add this technology it's TOP - could be THE best fashion mask in the market.”

I’m now hoping that they can license to other manufacturers!