RE: This is serious (2)9 Oct 2021 16:45
I'm a great believer in the saying from the poem 'a little knowledge is a dangerous thing..............and drinking largely sobers us again'. Having, erroneously, railed against incompent lawyers for many years, only to discover that they as corrupt as a bunch as they were incompetent as individuals, I did gain a LITTLE knowledge, and became 'a *fool* when I became my client'.
This draws me to the question of the alleged possible takeover of NCM and the contract (the content of which I can only guess) between NCM and GGP. The existing contract of joint venture is between the aforesaid (sounding very legal) the owners of which are in turn the shareholders. The arguable questionable question therefore is IF NCM is taken over in full, not merely a majority holding, and an allowance for such an event has not been made, can the contract be voided by GGP as a cosignatory is now no longer a lawful entity ?
The further question is IF an allowance has been made for such an event, WHY?
The above could, more probable than possible, be a load of reverse parc, but I'm bored waiting to make my daughter a millionairess and not being a wise man with something to say, wished to say something. Stay Safe.