Member Info for wasit10538

I'll sell him some of mine......for a price.

I expect Angus to apply for planning permission for production from the Kimmeridge at Lidsey-X1 in the future and crucially permission to increase the number of tankers from 8 a week permitted at present. Lidsey-X1 is in the wrong spot for good production from the Oolite but apparently not for the Kimmeridge and Oxford layers.

See Angus website,video section,Paul Vonk interview London South East. Paul Vonk gives the rational for testing Balcombe first about half way through the interview.

Lidsey 5.3km2. 60% interest, Brockham 8.9km2 65% interest, Holmwood 91.8 km2 12.5% interest, Balcombe 154km2 25% interest.

Horse hill test plus massively oversold?

So the Bergen shares have probably now all been sold but it's the months of inactivity and drift that is the major factor in the s.p. decline. From the reply to my email from Angus yesterday " We appreciate your thoughts and assure you the company will evaluate all options at its disposal." Number one option is to flow test Balcombe before SCC planning decision on Brockham and to incur the extra cost of re-hiring equipment for Brockham. This option alone would deliver a tremendous filip to the s.p.

I hope you are right lbug,I think you probably are right.

Neon,fast tracking Balcombe was what I asked them to consider in my email.

Evaluate not evaluation.

Thank you for this note. We appreciate your thoughts and assure you the company will evaluation all options at its disposal. This process and the delays this far are frustrating for all of us. Please note that like yourself,the executive team has significant holdings in Angus Energy to assure our interests are mutually aligned. More information on this can be found on our website.

Neon if Horse Hill flows well in the next few weeks you won't see 4.5p again with 65% of Brockham and 25% of Balcombe.

I received a phone call from David Maxwell this morning confirming that the Brockham application is now scheduled for the August planning meeting but of course their is no guarantee of this. He did emphasis that the planning officers are keen to finalise this application but as Wolf said there are a few points to be clarified by Angus and the final report has to be completed two weeks before the meeting.

Horse hill flow test commencing.

They have to flow test Balcombe now whatever the extra cost involved and I have emailed them urging them to take this course of action and suggest that other shareholders do the same. Instead of adopting a supine position regarding SCC it's long overdue for them to become pro-active by flow testing Balcombe,if they were planning on 6 tankers a day for Brockham how many more would they need for Balcombe?

In answer to the question about hgv movement during the ewt raised by Mole Valley DC Angus are proposing "worst" case scenario of 24 tanker movements,12 in and 12 out,but are working on the assumption of 12 tanker movements per day,6 in and 6 out. But of course as Angus state in their reply until the ewt is performed then it is impossible to verify.

Well there had to be a point at which taxing energy bills to fund green lifestyles and projects could no longer be sustained. Looks like that point in the economy has been reached.

Pboo that is just the sort of immature post I expect from you these days which is a shame because you started off so well, you've probably been hanging around with Foolish people too long lol. Seems to me that you are allowing your ego to dominate your posting,so either you are in Alan's camp or Pboo's camp according to you,how ridiculous. I appreciate what both of you contribute,Alan's expert knowledge and experience and your photo reports of events unfolding.So please drop this petty feud and metaphorically shake hands on the BB before we are all bored to death by it.

" It's my ball and if you aren't nice to me I'm going home " grow up Pboo.

The sp got quite a tick up at the close lol.

I think you'll find that it was giftedgenie lol.