Member Info for Warthog4

MM's at it again-reached 7.2 then slashed back to 6.9 at a stroke. In for a bumpy day methinks

LGEN and Aviva number's 19 and 20 in today's Losers chart. The Pru number 1 with a massive 4.39%

Not just in a trading range-in a time warp as well!!

SOG.
We and many of our friends have had both jabs and I can assure you we are very far from complacent. I monitor daily UK stats. on Worldometer and it ain't looking good as the following figures demonstrate-Columns 2 and 4 are Confirmed Cases and Deaths respectively- week runs from Sunday-Saturday
W/ending
8.5.21 14,560 -5.21% 79 -26.17%
15.5.21 15,762 8.26% 72 -8.86%
22.5.21 17,410 10.46% 35 -51.39%
29.5.21 21,469 23.31% 59 68.57%
5.6.21 31,395 46.23% 61 3.39%
12.6.21 47,869 52.47% 60 -1.64%
19.6.21 63,764 33.21% 74 23.33%
26.6.21 97,618 53.09% 119 60.81%

As at last night, for the first 3 days of the week, Confirmed Cases were up 84.5% on the same day last week-deaths static.

Spot on Lazada-neither will they after the investigation is concluded as they will surely fight shy of offering any inducements in that part of the World ever again. Ditto other UK companies all much to the great glee of our global competitors.
IF the UK government was squeaky clean (pause for howls of laughter) one could understand this holier then thou attitude towards bribery, but they ain't so the SFO is merely propagating their galloping hypocrisy.

"I am half expecting no rns in the next 24 hours"
So presumably your other half is??

stress-free
I see you received the same brush-off.!
As for the fatuous comment "I hope you find this information helpful" words fail me-they live in a sodding dream world.

I wrote to Sodofsky back in May and eventuallyreceived the following response, by email, from a minion.

"Thank you for your letter dated 12 May 2021, which was received on 14 May 2021, to the SFO Director concerning our investigation into Petrofac. I have been asked to respond on her behalf. I will also be sending a hard copy of this response through the post.
I can only reiterate our most recent response to you dated 22 April 2021 that we are committed to investigating each case thoroughly and precisely.
However, as has been explained to you on a number of previous occasions given the seriousness and complexity of the matters the SFO investigates it is not unusual for our cases to continue for some time. I recognise your frustration at the length of time required to properly conduct a thorough investigation in this instance. I am, however, unable to provide any information beyond that already published on the SFO’s website (or otherwise publicly available) and referred to in our previous letters to you.
I am very sorry I could not be of any more assistance on this, or previous occasions. However, this is a large investigation with many international dimensions, and the SFO continues to progress its inquiries in relation to this matter as expeditiously as possible.
I would again like to extend my sincerest sympathies to you for the difficult circumstances you are experiencing as a consequence of the matter under investigation. I have included with this letter an information sheet for victims and those affected by economic crime, which you may find useful. You may also wish to contact your local victim support service, I have included their contact details at the end of this letter.
I hope that you find this response helpful." (No-I didn't!!)

Their smug, patronising comment "However, as has been explained to you on a number of previous occasions......" (two to be precise!!) received an extremely robust response.
Their letter of 22nd April never arrived, ditto the promised hard copy of the email.
The "information sheet for victims" was not attached as indicated, instead they sent back a copy of my letter to them.
The contact details for the local victim support service were not attached as indicated

As it is blatantly obvious they are incapable of carrying out the simplest tasks I think they will still be buggering about this time next year.
GLA

To this Sly person whose inane ramblings have blighted this board for the last few days.
I usually enjoy a fair fight backed by logical thinking, but in your case I will make an exception on the basis that It is out of order to pick a fight with an unarmed opponent.
Don't bother to unleash more vitriol because you have been filtered

"inside track" -nail on head sharefall!!
Not coincidence that 2 financial institutions increased their short positions significantly just 2 days before the SFO investigation was announced in 2017. Was it investigated-was it eckaslike!

Thanks Denby.
Anybody who quotes from the Grauniad's totally unbiased reporting has to be a comedian!!

cicos-dunno who you are but if you are a veteran of 10 years you will know the SP 10 years ago was £0.56.
You know what is is today-an increase of nearly 1,000% which, compared with so-called Blue Chip shares 10 year record e.g. Aviva whose SP has stagnated over the same period, has to be some sort of result. Maybe not comparing like with like I'll grant you but you get the message.

making me dizzy today-what the h..l are they playing at-Russian roulette??????

"..........furthermore during our constructive engagement with the SFO in the last four years we recognise their stated approach to bring pace, and importantly focus, to their investigations as they progress, and we look forward to bringing this matter to closure as quickly as possible.”

Not quite 4.5% drop to below where we started out this morning.

......just like the Tory Government- all at sea

Nope 'cos just a few minutes later clipped back to 7.10
A bouncy castle type morning!

https://www.obn.org.uk/Portals/0/Docs%20for%20accessing%20via%20website/Industry%20Sector%20Registered%20Companies.pdf?ver=sSdEZxElmt-UWmCMHwo21w%3d%3d

Six days ago Sareum was on the list with CEO show as presenter.
Why tell us this morning?? No idea.

Agreed. In any case Sareum (CEO) is shown on the list of participants published on 15th June.

Inclined to agree but "showcasing" is one thing, actually announcing positive news is maybe another? Surely the latter, being very price sensitive, would have to be by way of a RNS rather than being droppoed into a presentation during Market Hours?
Either way everything crossed Ladies and Gents (and I do mean Ladies and Gents notwithsatnding the latest gender neutral diktats by the Central Committee)