Member Info for VincentVega

Seems he’s gone all in on Caledonia. (formally Vela)

According to his post on ADVFN, he now owns 1% of their issued shares.

A fool and his money……

“Well done Joe, averaging down not only increase your chances of a return, it also minimise your loses if goes tits up.”

I’d very much love to hear how that works,

That’s the danger of putting all of your eggs in one basket, there’s no plan B.

There are many indicators as TT has already mentioned, and then some more.

The basic foundation for all of these technical indicators relies on volume. Without volume you’re peeing in the wind and are subject to the vagaries of the MMs and their use of the spread in particular.

With respect to volume, Ciz has only managed a lofty 6m in daily trades once this year. Approximately 80% of daily trade volumes fall below 1m.

Hardly a traders wet dream.

VV

I couldn’t agree more Bermondsey.

I’ve often researched Company’s with a view to a potential investment.

When it comes to small caps, I run a mile from those that RNS New Website or New Company Presentation. It comes across as a filler and somewhat desperate when in reality it’s a sidestep from the news that those already invested are waiting for.

As I’m already invested I find it disappointing that they’ve stopped to this. It’s a million miles from being material news.

VV

I’d hazard that your comment on China is currently inconsequential. It could qualify as a cheap shot, even though the the US focus means eggs in one basket.

What I would say is that the previous self induced prevails of OBD have done us no favours with regard CIZ in this disruptive space. That, coupled with the poor communication from CIZ, contributes to our poor visibility to the wider market.

I don’t think I need explain the difference in market models between OBD and CIZ, but one niggle for me is the reporting requirements that Ciz Bio and Cizzle Biotechnology have to adhere to given that we’ve rolled our dice in the US.

I do recall watching the previous CEO of OBD quoting unprecedented demand for their product.

We know how that story went.

VV

Sorry to hear of your good lady’s injuries Neilin.

I hope she recovers soon.

VV

To scroll past the green coffins.

Brondby, you’re wasting your time conversing with Joey. He shouldn’t be allowed to gamble with real money.

Yes, I agree with Morpheus.

Given the amount of posts responding to our resident whiner and the green coffins I can only deduce that he’s thrown his toys out of the pram again.

It’s so much more peaceful if you put him on filter. That is of course if people didn’t respond to his attention seeking posts.

He’s had ample opportunity to crystallise a gain.

VV

The test can be done in a gp office 

And results are same day 

Sure you’ve done your DD properly?

———-

After having been invested in this Company for clocking on 3 years I’d like to think I’ve done my fair share of DD.

I’ll admit that I’ve relied on other more informed opinions like those of neilin to plug the technical gaps, and I’m thankful to him for sharing his knowledge.

The one thing I don’t do is post ad nauseum on countless other boards about a future milestone that we all hope will come to fruition. Unfortunately, your ramping makes out that this is a next step formality, when quite clearly there are countless steps that need to be made to get there. These steps aren’t referred to in any of your posts. That’s why I called you out, and I stand by that. That’s also a likely contributor for the last spike and consequent reversal.

I for one want the science to do the talking based on the incremental proving of the product starting with a successful LDT rollout.

Thanks for asking about my DD.

I’ll stick to realism and this bulletin board.

Btw, the 10% is now in question, but best to not let that get in your way, hey!

“results the same day and can be done in a GPs office “

That’s what’s wrong with your statement.

“results the same day and can be done in a GPs office

3x billion $ JVs “

This is just what I meant by the rampers that caused the unnecessary spike.

Your posts are misleading in the extreme.

Ramp 2.0 initiated.

This is what happens when you have posters ramping the share on countless other boards and social media sites.

And as if by magic they’ve disappeared.

VV

Indeed Hogbog, there are some new faces appearing on here and ADVFN, making claims for which they haven’t even provided a shred of empirical evidence to back up their fanciful claims.

Yes, the sp has settled down due in part to people taking a profit from the recent lows.

I was watching the price action on Trelus Health today as it rose 400%+ and retraced to 300% plus at lunchtime only to take off again to 640% at time of posting this.

The Ciz equivalent would be over 12p given that action.

Quite a few green coffin posts. Has Joey finally put us out of our misery and sold up?

VV

Hear, hear Hogbog.

I tend to put rampers from nowhere on ignore. They actually have the opposite effect on me, and others I’ve heard.

The RNS stated…

“With commercial antibodies in production and continuing the programme with BioTechne, the Company was pleased to announce on 2 April 2024 that it had signed a Memorandum of Understanding ("MoU") with a new business, funded by high-net worth individuals as an exclusive licensing partner for the USA and Canada. To align the interests of the two businesses, the US entity was named Cizzle Bio. The Company received a non-refundable upfront fee of US$100,000 and following the completion of the binding legal agreement, an initial up front royalty of US$300,000 is payable to Cizzle. Thereafter a royalty of 10% will be paid on revenues using the Company's technology, guaranteed by sequential minimum US$ 1 million payments on the 15th and 30th month anniversaries. The Company will also benefit in a 10% equity stake for no cash consideration.”

 

So far as I’m aware, this was the last official regulatory statement on the percentage regarding the equity stake in Ciz Bio Inc.

The subsequent signing of the agreement mentions no change in the % so as an investor, I would naturally assume that, unless told otherwise, this 10% equity still holds good. It doesn’t say 10% of equity if their only product is Ciz1b.

If the terms around our 10% equity have changed, then this should have been made clear in the Execution Of Agreement RNS. Failure to announce this change, if this really is the case would not only change my view on this agreement, it would put serious doubt in my mind with regard to the trust I afford to our CEO.

Bamb,

Just put the muppet on filter.

He has nothing of merit to offer to the discussion and never will have.

His green box count over the last couple of weeks confirms that he’s reverted to norm, and that’s without reading his whining missives.

Just like any bag of gas, it will eventually deflate.

VV

Never seen so many.

I’d highly recommend the filter option to those that still suffer his whining.

Green is quickly becoming my favourite colour.

Lol

VV