Member Info for VincentVega

In the absence of an April 2025 launch in the US, there is some encouragement to be had in recent activity over the pond.

That said, the much trumpeted April 2025 launch date has been missed by miles.

My fear, given the language in today’s RNS, is that whilst the original agreement with CIZ BIO Inc, being a pure royalty contract where they pay for all of the costs to get this to launch, why is there such emphasis on the new CLN being used in part to get the US effort over the line?

I’d imagine that Prof Coverley’s time spent specifically on supporting CIZ Bio Inc, would be funded by them.

Afterall, this loan note once converted, dilutes UK shareholders, not our US partner.

It’s called an uncrossing trade for a reason. It matches buys and sells.

You need DMA to participate.

I guess it is different. Not something our ramper-in-chief saw in the technicals, eh!

Lmao.

That’s exactly what the CEO of OBD did.

He hired his daughter and not long after…

Guess.

Vv

Having just returned from a 10 day golfing holiday abroad, I see that our CEO is once again wasting everyone’s time in an interview telling us what the problem is with current lung cancer tests.

As if we don’t already know.

I’m more interested in delivery rather than labour pains.

He was at pains to thank shareholder support, but failed to address the key issues of shareholder’s concerns, namely; why we are now 6 months behind after boldly announcing a launch date in North America.

His update on the current status of progress with the NHS following the loan note was frankly disappointing. That’s my attempt at politeness.

I’d have hoped for a lot more detail.

3 out of 10 for progress.

The share patterns have been bullish on multiple occasions over the last few years, but not once have the fundamentals backed the rise in the sp.

That’s why we’re still under 2p.

With respect, I’m only interested in milestones. That’s why I’m invested.

Short term TA is nice for those that want to trade, but I don’t have the time and that’s why I want to see progress instead of listening to the obvious “Johnny-come-lately’s” ramping this on other social media sites to feather their own trading nests.

“Given the need for heavy investment to get to market at scale, and the whole modus operandi is to save lives, I don’t see how Cizzle do this alone and need a bigger partner (in some commercial capacity) but time will tell…”

In fairness, AS has stated the needs of partners throughout all of his interviews. Given that the licensing model requires just that. I am disappointed that he’s put all of his eggs in one basket. The model for any partner is that they take on all costs of getting the product through their Country regulations.

What’s stopping his much stated model from signing multiple licensing agreements all at once?

What happened to China?

It’s merely the MMs balancing trades.

They have to balance their books by close of play.

Nothing to do with signals. That’s what I learned watching an interview with a MM about 20yrs ago.

I see the P&D crew are back.

Dazhahs,

Yes it was but the overshoot wasn’t.

We now have new investors that are asking basic what next questions, whilst the ramper that brought them here was probably exiting as they were buying in.

This exact scenario is not new on here by a long stretch.

I take it you’re another victim of the DH ramp?

Now………

Watch the same posters vanish now that their work is done.

Just as they have on numerous occasions before.

That’s just the point. It’s not occasional. The p&d over the last 3 years has done more to deter new LTHs than the dearth in news from the Company.

The rinse and repeat boys are here again and they’ll mostly be gone after they press the button on 20%.

I too am a LTH.

That our pumper & dumper is back.

Godot, springs to mind.

CFD rollovers normally involve 2 transactions. Mostly, there is also a difference in price between the 2. That’s normally the margin for the provider.

The fact that there are 3 trades at the same price and time stamped exactly is quite puzzling.

I’d have thought that one of those transactions was a cancellation on either the sell or buy side, but as ever, the retail holder is the last to know.

Of course, we could all be surprised with a holdings RNS. Afterall, even the shoddy reporting from this Company cannot ignore it’s fiduciary obligations.

VV

So you’re not relying on charts and technical analysis then?

I’m curious to know why you bought in, in the last few days if you expect it to hit 1.45p.

I take it that from all of the green coffins I’m seeing, that Joe is still at large here.

I can’t be bothered to unfilter the lunatic, but I do recall somebody suggesting just a couple of days ago that my comments regarding filtering him were harsh.

This is the knee jerk gambler that sold up here to go all in on a renamed Vela.

Stop wasting your time giving him airtime.

Now he’s calling himself bloggingjoe.

He’s got to hold the record for a single poster with multiple ID’s that I’ve filtered…ever!

Green coffin time.