Courtesy sirmoori on ADVFN29 Jul 2015 23:33
The formal business of the AGM was quickly concluded. Neither XGC nor Trafigura directors were present. Although both Liberty and Orion had nominated, their directors would not join the board until completion of the new non-exec recruitment process. Visits/interviews of candidates will take place tomorrow (Thursday). Once non-execs are selected, all new directors will join. In this way, the independent voice on the board will remain in numerical balance to the major, institutional partners.
Overall, AL confirmed that achievement of both Ph 1 and Ph 2 production remained on course. However, it was obvious from a comprehensive tour of the plant immediately following the meeting that the 265 EMED staff and 500 specialists from more than 40 contractors working in shifts 24hours a day are making much more progress than the bare reports are able to portray. Comment: although January 2016 has been mentioned as the target date for production, given the substantially complete commissioning that I saw today, I would be surprised if EMED did not succeed in beating that deadline.
The sense of purpose, urgency and enthusiasm is palpable. The front end crushing is working. 100t lorry loads were being ground in 2-3 minutes. The Ph1 line is fully commissioned, water only. The next step is to introduce ore from the rapidly mounting stockpile.
There was no announcement about reserves etc although EMED have received the completed, independent report. The delay now is because the Toronto listing rules would require a declaration not just of the data but, under certain legal conditions, a full statement of all Ph 2 capital and operating costs. TSX rules require a qualifying resource statement to be followed by this subsequent, detailed report within 45 days. This is not required under AIM rules. EMED are waiting for legal advice on just what is required under TSX rules. The meeting heard that, given the potential need for such a detailed report and with Ph 2 capex and opex still not completely set in stone, the board don't want to start a 45 day clock ticking if they are not in a position to report on time and accurately.
The board have decided on a new name and (I think) have registered it. An EGM is required to approve it. I had the impression that this would not be long coming.
The exploration programme continues. The resource upgrade takes into account all data collected till May.
There was little understanding of how GS could possibly support their bearish assertions on Cu prices.
The Rumbo rep asked for details of the off take agreements. I think my notes say that only 20% of the agreements provide for any kind of discount to the market price. Off take totals are: 20% Traf; 50% XGC; 30% Orion. The market terms also assume costs based on shipping to China, but concentrate may be shipped closer to home. If China is not the destination, the difference in costs will represent savings (not sure how).
I see other posters have identified the ne