Member Info for Vanilla

I'd rather put a 4 after the sp 164p would do very nicely and is about what i think this is worth at present considering the investment to get here developing a piece of ground breaking technology.

Same as me have a lot invested here now thankfully with an average that will not take too much to break even. Seeing a fully working machine operating at 230MeV is much needed when looking at this sp. After getting this far just can't see this being allowed to fail but hopefully they can succeed and preserve shareholder value along the way which looks to be quite an obstacle from this low level however sentiment can quickly change.

Didn't expect Avacta to pop up at the end of this article. Hopefully it's a good omen and we soon hear positive news.
https://www.share-talk.com/4-best-high-risk-high-reward-ftse-aim-stocks-to-consider-for-2023/

I think you'll be ok with buying at that price PM. I tried it at around 22p but unfortunately it's drifted lower although my average has benefitted. Don't forget OAM and others have made significant investments at 25p so they must see potential so to get in way below that is not a bad move I think.

Yes thanks for the update point taken about becoming impatient with timeframes. I'm still holding like many and I'm sure at some point we'll be over the moon with the flow of orders once this next phase of accreditation is completed.

With ABB being one of their partners the massive scale comment is very likely to become reality. This is one of the many IoT avenues that cpx are involved with. The murata deal alone will probably provide the numbers we hope for and with the recent Ioxus success and announcements of additional products this really is looking to be one of the more reliable bets on AIM.

Well done on those trades sushi I've just bought more and more and never sold a single share. Not the best with hindsight but more than happy with my substantial holding.

90,000 ships to target from their website. They might be a small startup company but I wouldn't underestimate their capability. Some of the most innovative technology has come out out of Israel. Let's hope this takes off in a big way.

Open it isn't anything that sinister look at the wider market. Technology shares have heavily declined this year with amazon alone losing $1trillion. Unfortunately as well as cpx are doing we will have to wait for the market to recover to feel the full benefit of their progress.

Absolutely Mer in this crazy market best to sit tight and hold on to any decent companies as painful as it is during this volatility. At least we got profits as well as other developments to look forwards to and things can change very quickly but I don't expect much this side of xmas now.

Presentation is now on the website hopefully some positivity starts to filter through.

I'm sure that will be a wise decision Open the only thing I would say is that previous highs were based on undelivered expectations hence the subsequent price falls. When the share price next passes 15p on it's rise to the 20's it will be due to delivering on the profit numbers. If profits continue to increase the sp will follow so a different situation to previous highs. With the payment of dividends also on the table the decision of selling for me is slightly more complicated but anywhere in the 20's will be difficult to resist. I can imagine you ranting on this BB for years about missing out on 57p!

It is and incredibly frustrating but all cpx can do is continue its progress towards profitability with increased sales and profit margins as has been reported. The market is disorientated at the moment, I'm heavily invested here and will remain so content that the company is making good progress and is in no way an AIM dud. It's been too many years and sometimes demoralising but when ebitda profitability is achieved the market must correct this imbalance at some point.

Exactly Energy, you can debate all day the many subjective opinions here but that article carries more weight...ironically in my opinion!

This was posted some time ago can't remember who by but the information especially the paragraph below I think is very relevant to whether it is working and carries much more value/credibility to the point about whether phase 1 is just purely about safety. I just can't see how the trial would have continued for so long at such high doses if there was absolutely no benefit.

https://www.bmj.com/careers/article/professor-james-spicer-professor-of-experimental-cancer-medicine-king-s-college-london

We need to stop it, and that's explicitly an intention of early phase, Phase I trials. One major contribution we can make is to take a drug which is actually not doing what it should, to discontinue its development as soon as possible. Before too many patients are exposed to an ineffective drug, and before too much money is wasted trying to develop it.

Very true Wiggly and whilst some may doubt the credibility of what Avacta's communicaes there is no doubt the safety committee would not allow a terminally ill patient to be injected with poison at such high doses for this length of time just to see how much of an ineffective concoction they can pump in. Totally unethical and has already been stated in an interview by a senior member of the committee that one of their most important functions is to stop these trials as soon as possible if there is little chance of success. For this reason I am sure it is cleaving and to a level that is potentially effective maybe not as good as preclinical but nonetheless to a degree that they see merit in the trials continuation. This independent validation for me is the most important sign of success and can't be muddled with the past lack of success in projects that Avacta were directly heavily promoting.

I take your point Mer I hadn't assumed whoever asked that question was assuming dividends could be paid to reward shareholders as of now. From my perspective I wasn't thinking they would pay a dividend when profitability is achieved but instead would be investing profits for growth. Hopefully we'll get a double bonus with a increase in sp and a dividend payout.

The last answer to the agm questions suggest a payment of dividends when profitability is achieved. That will certainly help the sp and would be a strong reason to keep hold of any large shareholding. Might have to rethink my strategy of off loading a few at 20p.

That's one of the most upbeat statements we've ever had and to think 60m pipeline from what is basically the relatively low value prizmatic products with 4 x production capacity available at 7 Hills. A few orders from the other product range as hinted with the Ioxus order will have a big impact on the numbers assuming large cap modules and truckstart are typically more expensive products although understandably won't sell in the volumes of prizmatic cells. No mention of Maxwell which still rumbles on but in no way should be holding back the sp or progress perhaps not a bad thing to take focus away from what seems to be a unnecessary distraction to the sp.

It looks very clear to me in that they will only allocate unused entitlements and that paragraph relates to how they will distribute unused entitlements if at all based on several factors. I've seen instances in the past where for example any requests over a substantial request such as say 5000 were declined in full so no excess shares allocated to those requests. It may be that they scale back all requests regardless of amount requested to say 500. Might be prudent to request a sensible amount around 1000 to be safe of getting some but we'll find out soon.