Member Info for Vanilla

Think it was made up from a poster called positive who came here for a short while ramping the hell out of it then disappeared. Funny thing is I think his 3p ramp could be achieved although some decent posters here believe even higher is possible with the binder potential. Have to say with E&Y standing in front of a poster with mod ul and smt products displayed anything is possible.

Is that your holding m99 will be a nice value at 3p will you hold for potential rewards

Ernst & Young now the big boys getting involved if that isn't a sign of something going on and it's still all top secret.

Just to add the only way dh and gc can exit without decimating the sp is through a takeover unless cap-xx turn into apple with shares in such high demand no amount of selling would stop the inevitable rise. The binder could be good but not sure it's that special.

Still we await news whilst the dream continues!

Agreed janoz especially your comment about the temporary CFO as won't be needing one when absorbed into schurter. I can only think that let's say schurter buy-out cap-xx for 3p a share (i wish) which would be a significant uplift but the technology and growth potential is 10p a share then capvis get the benefit of putting cap-xx through an ipo as part of schurter group that otherwise wouldn't be possible.

Normally companies are split up to achieve maximum value but capvis are the money experts and will know exactly how to maximise value for their shareholders, hopefully it is also to the benefit of existing cap-xx shareholders.

Google ai thinks it less complex for schurter to take over cap-xx before they ipo. Maybe it's better for cap-xx to establish significant value through a technological breakthrough first or perhaps a reverse merger is being considered.

It is generally not advisable, and frequently problematic, for a private company to hold shares in a publicly listed company before its own IPO. While it provides a liquid asset, it introduces significant structural, legal, and valuation complications that can disrupt a public offering.Key Risks and ChallengesThe "Inadvertent Investment Company" Risk: In the US, the Investment Company Act of 1940 stipulates that if a company holds more than \(40\%\) of its total assets in "investment securities" (which includes public stock), it is legally classified as an investment company. Being deemed an investment company brings cumbersome SEC reporting obligations, limitations on capital structure, and governance restrictions that can derail an IPO.Valuation Distortion: Investment banks and institutional investors price IPOs based on a private company's core operational metrics (e.g., revenue growth, EBITDA). If the company's balance sheet contains large, volatile holdings of public stock, it distorts the true operating value, makes forecasting difficult, and complicates the IPO Process.Tax Inefficiencies: Holding public shares inside a corporate structure typically subjects those assets to corporate taxes, including potential Capital Gains Tax upon any gains or corporation tax on dividends, which is much less tax-efficient than individuals holding the assets directly.Accounting Complexity: Publicly listed securities must be marked to market every quarter, which introduces unwanted volatility into the private company's quarterly earnings leading up to the IPO.Potential ExceptionsThere are very few scenarios where this is beneficial, usually limited to strategic investments (e.g., if the private company and the public company have a vital commercial partnership or joint venture) or in the case of a reverse merger or pre-IPO corporate acquisition.Strategic TakeawaysIf a private company has excess cash to invest, financial advisors and legal counsel usually recommend setting up a separate investment subsidiary or using a wealth management account rather than holding the equities directly on the core corporate balance sheet. Before filing for an IPO, it is highly standard for underwriters to require the private company to divest (spin off or sell) these public shareholdings to "clean up" the balance sheet.

Still holding all my shares so sincerely hope so janoz and will enjoy joining in the celebrations.

Until cap-xx confirm officially with an rns I wouldn't assume anything. Does look promising though but been here many times before and past experience suggests it's best to hear from tuxedo man himself.

90 million tags with supercapacitors at $1ea potentially $90m by end 2026....no need to rns such a small deal then for cap-xx probably won't even notice it in the end of year results.

Probably because of the new linkedin picture of smiley Lars and Graham Cooley post complimenting on a great photo. I'm sure they're doing it as a wind up now I'd love for someone to reply to GC on behalf of long term shareholders thanking cap-xx for the pictures of the celebrations and that we can't wait for the next release of pictures celebrating such fantastic achievements!

I'm sure we'll find out soon what all this is about so we too can raise a glass to some long awaited success!!

Anthony Kongats is liking the latest cap-xx linkedin post. Is that an omen that after all these years cap-xx is finally going to become the company AK dreamed of. I wonder if he remained a shareholder believing that one day his vision for cap-xx would be fulfilled. Maybe he was just years ahead of his time!

S626 I'm not sure what to make of the LST debacle. What looked like a premature jump over to cap-xx turned out to be a stroke of good fortune when the placing arrived and surely he didn't have advanced warning that was coming. Then to announce on linkedin of exciting times ahead after lunch with Lars and GC I guess as he was already fully invested at that time and hasn't sold down can only be good news. I'd rather receive those little bits of information on linkedin than total silence assuming it's all wrapped in in NDAs.

Thanks Grove I also agree and appreciate all comments including those relatively new here like wyn who although I share his frustration over lack of news should be thankful he hasn't had to experience the old cap-xx v1 failures.

Although we haven't had an rns the linkedin updates and Lars explanation of why not all details are being released may yet turn out to be valid. This is AIM though so be prepared for lies, scandal and disappointment unless we're fortunate enough to be holding a real gem!

Could schurter do a share transaction that valued cap-xx at around 200m then dispose of their shares that would bank around £10m. That's a decent amount of cash to add to the pot.

Could schurter do a share transaction that valued cap-xx at around 200m then dispose of their shares that would bank around £10m. That's a decent amount of cash to add to the pot.

I agree s626 something has been agreed between this lot. Schurter wouldn't commit to the level they have and risk cap-xx going to a competitor. The only confusing part is why they didn't take them out for a few million so I think they will ipo then take them over with a share offer. Not sure yet how they will cash in their shares in that scenario but I'm sure it will provide a tidy sum one way or another.

This is what we're waiting for parkez the binder it could make a difference and finally take the r out of little old aim crap-xx

Yes, the new aqueous polymer binder is designed for global deployment. CAP-XX holds international patents protecting the technology in over 150 countries. They have successfully passed feasibility testing on production coating lines and plan to roll it out globally, either via direct supply or by licensing it to larger manufacturers.The binder acts as a key upgrade to their supercapacitors, improving power output while satisfying strict global environmental regulations.Strategic Global RolloutGlobal Electronics Market: The proprietary binder improves power stats by up to 80%, allowing it to replace restricted chemicals (such as PVDF) in high-temperature or fast-charge applications globally.Manufacturing & Distribution: Production of these advanced supercapacitors is geared for mass scale. Through strategic partnerships—such as the technology cooperation agreement with SCHURTER AG—they are expanding their reach across demographic and geographic markets worldwide.Licensing Strategies: Due to intense interest from manufacturers looking to comply with regulations, CAP-XX is actively exploring licensing its binder formulas to larger global battery and chemical makers.While specific client names remain largely under Non-Disclosure Agreements (NDAs), CAP-XX is building groundwork with major brands and semiconductor firms across the US, Asia, and Europe.

True wyn and that's why I'll be happy for cap-xx to become profitable and for schurter to acquire them for no less than 3p. That does not make them a big company at around 170m mcap and could even go a bit higher and still fall within your profile

Must be the heat! Anyway meant to say end of calendar year should achieve breakeven with the news that is due.

After more than 10yrs of waiting for cap-xx to deliver anything if they don't crack it by the end of this calendar year I'll be with you Newcastle and throw in the towel to another AIM write off!

Well Newcastle if it helps in whatever your motive is I don't think cap-xx will achieve their stated aim of breakeven this financial year being end of June. However if the parkez news arrives with the resulting deals that will result should the calendar year end