RE: Defensive move to prevent a takeover?29 Mar 2024 11:46
All that is good as an interesting side show( and actually as a means of diverting attention from what has actually happened) .
The fundraising was actually going well. The cash was a life saver to the company assuring it's future.Ok it meant that Roxi was going to get effectively half the company in return but shareholders would still have a stake( which they could maintain by participating in the fundraising) All good, in fact even more so as Curren's control would be lessened.
However the bombshell ( and it's nuclear and the result of this must have been foreseen) was the tactic to delist and take the company private announced at the same point as trying to get a big fundraising through and realise more emergency cash yesterday????
How obliviously destructive of any value that may be being restored. Delisting means existing shareholders are disenfranchised ( basically wiped out) when company go private they can do what they want. They can and usually do, dilute legacy shareholders out of existence. They sideline them, reissue shares, consolidate and generally rearrange them out of existence. My question is why do this now while still trying to arrange a delicate, critical fundraising to keep the very lights on at 10p????
The share price reaction says it all( - 45%in two or so hours?) incredible. If this was always the intention why was this not given out before the vote on Monday so shareholders knew the truth about f what was really happening. Shareholders voted for a fundraising and staying listed not to be obliterated.Why were these material facts witheld from shareholders??
Shareholders were voting without being given the complete facts???
I find it very hard to believe such a momentous and climatic ( read devastating) decision to delist the company and destroy shareholders was made on the day before good Friday and already packing up for the Easter break???hmm.
Frankly incredible turn of events this week