Member Info for V111JAS

May be getting the message that these posters with multiple IDs who get banned one day an pop up the next are in fact destroying the credibility of this site . Genuine posters with an interest in various Companies will not waste their time trying to research information here whin the BB is over run by the lunatic fringe . I see the `Duck` got roasted , that `Turkey` got stuffed and the `You know everything and nothing` who created a new ID this morning has also been dismissed . LSE really need to keep on top of this charade or they wont have a site worth visiting at all .

" Explanation please. Why are board being cagey "

Probably because they know the vote will be NO .

15.39 : ' Which bit am I missing? :

Common sense .

Good Gracious !

I see that the CARBUNCLE and his new (?) side kick QUACK have been frantically posting again today .

I imagine this is , yet again , some desperate attempt to persuade and deliver a YES vote .

In fact I suspect this strange activity will likely have quite the opposite effect to their objective and that investors reading the script to this pantomime are much more likely to be persuaded otherwise .

We`ll soon find out , but my feeling is that there will be another resounding NO .

Over a year after this fiasco began DonaldDuck suddenly waddles out of his pond declaring his avian support ......

18.47 ~ Steve ~ this individual infests the BB 24/7 , calling anyone who disagrees with his diatribe a `Troll` or some derogatory name such as `Gasbag`.

Clearly this is quite abnormal behaviur which can only be explained by some close association with those controlling (for the moment ) PPP .

I rather think this `CARBUNCLE` will either burst or be lanced as the next phase of this nonsense unfolds .

Awe Gawd ~ ~ ~ Just look who`s waaddled into the farm yard ...

I`m fully against this `NEW / old BOD , with the same old twaddle in a different wrapper .

~ QUACK ~ QUACK

.... " as we have said before nobody knows what is happening .."

So why on earth would would anyone vote Yes to something that they know nothing about ?

Especially from a bunch of `Directors` who clearly have no interest in shareholders concerns .

Just ~. BONKERS .

" How can anyone believe the continued nonsense posted hereToday 17:24

..by people you don't even know. "

You mean like people such as YOU !

And ~ People like Profithunter and LLL333 ( LUNN ?) who suddenly pop out of the the woodwork almost a year after all this trouble started .

How very strange that these `new posters` supposedly with an interest in the Company , some with virtually no history and identities but a few weeks old suddenly have messages in support of a yes vote .

No credibility , just more red flags . imo.

Excellent post Gasman ~ Excellent !

I find it really strange that `Some` people just can`t see through all the lies and deceit . Newuncle . Hepran , with a few others have waged a very determined campaign in support of this unelected BoD , I really wonder how close these people are to Lunn and the Directors . Perhaps they just hope to be able to close some huge short position , but their voluminous 24/7 presence on this site is clearly a red flag . They have obviously had a little success and some `Flip Floppers` like Zag have been sucked into the dark side and also now post incessantly in support of shallow statements devoid of any substance in the hope they `May` obtain some return under this opaque and dangerous scheme no doubt conjured up in the main by Lunn and his mute side kick Menzel .

I doubt the Yes vote WILL win , but if it does any hope of a return of value will surely be in vain .

If you haven`t yet voted NO ; NO might provide the opportunity to rid this Company of all those who behind the scenes would seem to be manipulating the current difficulties for their own ends , not for the benefit of genuine shareholders .

NO could end the current shenanigans , but will not end the business because there is obviously value here that is being concealed from shareholders .

No Accounts .

No Prospectus .

No Transparency .

No Trust .

No Integrity .

NO ~ NO ~ NO .........

12.29 : Succinct and absolutely correct Gasman .

Except ~ ~ ~ " forgetting this company is owned by shareholders! " I would say :

~ `Deliberately ignoring the fact that this company is owned by shareholders `.

CROOKS .

I suspect you are absolutely correct , and the primary reason for the NO vote is that the majority of shareholders quite simply do not trust a single word that this BoD say .

Is there something inaccurate in my criticism ?

Read this waffle very carefully :

.... " Pennpetro is carrying out due diligence on a number of strategic opportunities including in the United States and Canada. This is to supplement the already announced initial Ukrainian license. This potentially will provide geographical diversification and risk-management to the Company's operations going forward. ".....

IF / Maybe / Perhaps / Could be / Weather permitting ......

Can you really believe these vacuous words from a BoD who can`t even produce their accounts ?

NO .

I certainly agree with that ~~~ but what about all the others who were / are involved in this white collar crime ?

Dont be silly Mt Mosquito :

1. FYI , You probably mean a Norwich Pharmacal Order (NFO)

2. The cost of EACH order is likely to be in excess of 5000.00 GBP .

3.. Costs could escalate if unsuccessful .

4. What on earth would the Company hope to achieve ?

5. The Company would be even MORE likely to draw attention to their refusal to address Shareholders , MANY , concerns .

6. Apart from the costs , the Company has `Apparently` NO funds , so who pays ? I would really like to know the answer to that .

7, What on earth would the Company hope to achieve ?

and....

7. The process is likely to take months and face a serious re-buttle from any shareholder presented with such an order .

SO ~ Who IS offended and why ?

I will look forward to reading the next chapter of this `GRIM`s Fairy Tale ` in the morning .

" As for suing Evans, why, the BOD should be doing it "

YES ! They should , but as they were all likely up to their necks in this ~ They can`t !

The lying Crook Evans , and that is most certainly what he was , was very much involved in the rest of the cabal that have brought this Company to its knees :

Anton T , Lunn , Evans , Lenigas ...and others ; Who knows what their `Plans ` really were but one thing is as clear as daylight , these people were not acting in the interests of the Company or its shareholders . Now ~ has Lunn really just faded away into inactive obscurity ?