RE: Late?25 Mar 2020 19:25
Well , at least we had a statement from the BoD today albeit somewhat unclear .
There`s definitely a message in there somewhere , but I`ve been trying to translate (inconclusively) exactly what it might mean . Some thoughts :
* We haven`t got the cash at the moment but we WILL get it ;
Asset sale being negotiated , not concluded .
Alternative fund raise / Loan / JV .
* We are having difficulties because we haven`t been paid .
We will be paid ~ soon ?
* Our relationship with Optimum is intact and robust .
We are jointly committed to each other , but will review timescales .
OPL 310 may be delayed (Ref ; current global issues / oil , demand, price .)
* We are involved with T/O , or acquisition :
Confident that negotiations will facilitate payments now due and in May .
* We are considering / suspension until such time that market conditions improve .
Negotiations ongoing with our partners .
I certainly do not know what`s going on .
Clearly the Market doesn`t know exactly what`s going on , they don`t like these situations , hence the c. 7 Million mkt cap .
I do think this exposes the outrageous $ ! m salary being enjoyed by a CEO with a track record now under the microscope .
ALSO ,~ despite the apparent clean bill of health from Kroll , who do have a first class reputation , That Fraud has not really been satisfactorily explained . We do not know what Kroll found or said . Kroll did NOT publish their specific findings . ie :
Kroll did a forensic review , Kroll reported to the `Committee` , The `Committee` reported to the BOARD.
Note these EXTRACT comments from the RNS :
~ " The Committee was SUPPORTED in its review by Kroll Associates UK Limited ("Kroll") acting as THIRD-PARTY forensic investigators. Advice was taken from Herbert Smith Freehills LLP, legal counsel engaged at the time of the Investigation, on discreet issues arising from Kroll's work.
The Committee has REPORTED TO THE BOARD the following results of the Investigation:
-- The Facility Agreement was a part of a fraud perpetrated against the Company. The Facility Agreement, and the sums to be received by LEKOIL pursuant to it, are not legally binding.
-- There is no evidence of any complicity of any Lekoil Director or employee in the fraud.
-- The Chief Executive Officer ("CEO") LED THE INTERACTION and negotiations with the individuals falsely purporting to represent the QIA, on behalf of the Company, prior to ultimate approval being given by the Board to enter into the Facility Agreement.
-- The BOARD only approved the execution of the Facility Agreement after a third-party global risk consultant engaged to undertake the due diligence investigation on Seawave, provided a report, based on public record search, that did not identify any "red flags" on Seawave ~~"
I suspect all this is still a drag on the Company and its valuation .
Anyway , just a few thoughts , I still firmly believe (hope!) that we will exit this turmoil as a much stronger , viab