Member Info for Unluckaviva

Best message of the day by anyone.

Based on what planet? Even on its best day it only had 2.2 billion in assets after debt and 2/3 of that was in Russia pre war, that will be valueless, why do you think bank target is £3 after their actual analysis rather than picking figures from the sky.

If they sell russian side then they will be selling them as assets and not a business, as we have seen all the miners fold we know that russian mining businesses are worthless, it's why no one bought POG even at asset value, and market will be flooded with mines for sale.

After debt the whole company only had 2.2 Billion assets, that was pre war, russian was 2/3rds of its value and those 2/3 have dropped in asset value like a brick, if they dump Russia and loose debt in deal then it does not make it hard to see why banks target price is only £3.

They are not allowed to move money from Russia, that's part of the problem, Putin banned large sums of cash leaving the country.
After debt there won't be any large sums anyway.

Lol. Perhaps if they carried zero debt, if they had those kind of assets free and clear then the broker rating would not be £3

Nestle can self finance and wait for the war to end, even if that's ten years.

No hope, first of all bank rate whole thing as only worth £3, I expect they will sell russian side for the cost of debt pile and then avoid needing to make any payments any longer, remember financing is extremely hard currently, remeber also if anyone wanted to buy mines cheap at the moment they could of just bought or buy POG from receivers and acquire their assets for pennies on the pound, and with all the gold mines suffering in Russia from same problems the is a glut of options for buyers, this will drive prices even lower.
Even if they do sell for a profit then poly will face the same problem with money of sale as they do with dividends, Putin has banned large sums of cash leaving Russia, this is one of the big reasons companies are struggling.

550k out of 1700k

The banks value non Russia assets at £3 as only 550 Oz out of 1700 are from there and operating costs are higher.

Of course NATO is a threat to Russia, that's why Putin never or will devoted most of his serious kit to Ukraine fight.

The USA could not even fight old men with beards and 50s era russian light arms to a decisive win, they in every war they were in should of won quickly and fast when you look at numbers and tech, remember each war where we are shown a cruise missile going through a window to prove accuracy or how a plane takes out a convoy, the bunker busters decemated whole cave complexes etc, yet they all dragged on for years, even the last one has the Taliban back in power, but if you want to call those victories then be my guest.

The same way our robbing chancellor nicked money from energy companies to fund his cost of living give aways!

Oh and of course they are ramping up equipment and factory's, the one thing I can agree with is that the war never went the way Russia or world expected, they thought a show of force would get them what they wanted, they never thought a comedian was going to put up such a good resistance, as I said before Ukraine have done amazing work.
And whilst I think Putin is happy clearing out the old equipment stockpiles which will actually save him money in the future I am pretty sure he did not count on the early loses he received and although I think it's only 20% or less of his modern stuff the point is he knows he needs to replace it pretty fast for his next moves, if he started to pull equipment from other battalions and brigades then that would cause him genuine tactical headaches from those areas and would weaken his ability to respond to other threats or issues, he will want to be back to 100% readiness and equipment levels asap, if things kicked off with NATO do you think he would of exhausted his resources to mount a defence, he is well known for being paranoid, he will have his best stuff reserved for if NATO geared up, which he knows will be a possibility as Europeans might be cold in the winter.

You really love spreading propaganda don't you, it's amazing you are repeating all the propaganda you see here in the west without understanding the basics of how war reporting works, with all those good news clips and constant great turning points that things have not changed in months, well Russia keep edging slowly forward still.

Oh and I have never been banned and nor am I a Russian troll, I am just living in the real world and not trying to ramp a stock I own an increasing amount of, i assume you are a US troll who has been banned many times whilst you were pleasuring trump.

I don't think the Russians are bothered by HIMARS, if they were I am pretty sure they would swarm one with either airstrikes or a massive cruise or hypersonic strike, you are still thinking Putin thinks like you, he does not value life or property.

Russia never needed to send it's best stuff to the front line, most of its good equipment is with the 80% of its troops NOT deployed to Ukraine conflict, they have nearly a million enlisted troops and most of them have not been anywhere close to border even, it's funny how you condemn and say say Russia is using old kit and cannot translate the same to the USA sendIng 60year old kit that's been rotting away or the out of date rubbish Germany sent.

Still in your mind this should be over next week as we are at this new another turning point. I bet you don't even own Poly stock.

There is only one person making a fool of himself, it's not me, 10% accuracy of 60000 is 6000hits, that's better than the unknown hit rate of only 1000gps shells, even at 100% they are still losing 6-1, the Ukraine and Russia are fighting a different war, the problem is you seem not able to understand that, you seem to not be that if you only need rubble you do not need accuracy, oh and it Ukraine who says Russia is increasing and amassing attacks, not decreasing.

So I assume you think Ukraine have this sorted by next week then.

You seem to struggle understanding that a tactile retreat is showing that if you won't defend rubble then the other side know to create more rubble.

More lol, so 50% of 2500 is a lot more damage still than 1000 with unknown results, and it's you who needs perspective as 60000 rounds with even only 10% accuracy is still 6000 hits over 1000 with unknown accuracy, remember even the yanks could not win a war with unlimited access to these great weapons, as i have asked previously, which war did the USA win in last 50 years? That's right none!
You rampers keep predicting the end is soon and Russia will lose, it will not be over anytime soon and at best I will be a draw. Why cannot you see reality? Russia only deployed 20% of its forces, if Putin got serious he could of mobilised everything, he is fighting a different war to the one you think, again he does not need accuracy or $60000 GPS rounds to create rubble he knows no one will fight over, and like the USA now shipping 1960s equipment he does not need to risk modern tanks from other regiments when he can rollout his own old equipment to sap money from Ukraine allies, he loses a worthless tank which costs $60000 to destroy, those economics he will laugh at. But you keep ramping your rubbish, we will still be here in a year same chats.

Lol Russia is negotiating nothing other than grain movement, the obvious reason for that is so they can also shift their own fertilizer in a deal, it's not battlefield related.

So genius when do you think war will be over, with this amazing kit I assume Monday?

They are only sending 1000 rounds, Russia might be using less accurate shells but they are using 60000 of them a day, they do not need accuracy when they are happy creating a wasteland.

Also people are mocking Russia for using old tanks and equipment siting it as a turning point as they are running out of good stuff, but as this article mentions the USA and others are supplying Vietnam era equipment, so also old 1960s equipment, it's not that either have run out of good stuff, they are just getting rid of old stuff from storage as it's more cost effective to loose it on a battlefield that sadly no one is bothered about enough, this I a long draw from an unbiased view.

I think we can all agree though Ukraine have done amazing job.

I think being nationalised or a foreign business tax is more likely than sanction problem myself, Putin is a nutter and it is possible he gets all communist again.

Russia can hit HIMARS with cruise missiles or ballistics from 2500 miles away if they decided to stop hitting buildings, they also have satellites and intelligence, but unlike Ukraine they have love feed rather than waiting to see what NATO give them after meetings.

Ukraine has already shown and said they will retreat from defending rubble, Russia are happy it seems to grind on and just making that rubble.

Both sides just keep ramping up their few victories to prove they are turning a corner, this is just going to keep being slow attrition, and the world has limited attention spans, it's why no one cares when Russia took Crimea, lots of chest thumping but at the end who occupied it without much problem? Not even hard sanctions for that invasion.

Long term they will deal, they have 10's thousands of old equipment to keep throwing at it, I expect someone somewhere is glad to get a lot of it off the books.

But to me this is long term all good for us I think as I expect long term this to all be a win, only threat I see is if Putin nationalised foreign enterprise or taxes them hugely to raise funds, until then I am happy to keep topping up on dips, I am working on getting my average down from the £3.30 I started at.