RE: Perspective10 Jun 2023 10:26
Hi PI, yes my reasoning which many will disagree…
1. For 3 years she has built relationships, bonds and trust with all the various parties to date - CLX etc., instrumental in the lab purchase and development. She is well respected and internationally known in the bio world.
2. I am a big believer that you need a veteran of the industry, which in this case with scientific experience to understand the business properly rather than a CEO with just an MBA that does not understand the bio world and coming in cold.
3. Who replaces Suzy and the other directors mentioned? The company is then directionless until appointments made with a massive lead time to get up to speed with the business when we are on the cusp of many exciting developments and updates.
4. Talk of replacements is simply inertia because of THX and the placing which had to happen as THX hadn’t completed - either placing at 10p or turn off the lights, personally prefer the placing!
5. Need to think of the huge achievements Suzy has made to date - superb communications, killing dead wood IP, massive cost cutting and now with the light at the end of the tunnel that placings will be a thing of the past with deals nearing fruition and a revenue generating lab which again will slash external Thurs party costs on IP development.
I think PI’s frustration is interfering with common sense on the BoD and l would forget Adam joking in an exec role as l understand he has a highly profitable and successful business of his own …. Why would he leave?