Member Info for Uggy100

So 8 trading days left until the PFS is delayed by yet another month. We're also due a resource update on the offshore sands as well I believe.

Yeah saw that..............pathetic !

Persimmon

I remember you saying a while ago you were going to leave this BB, what a shame you didn't keep to your word.

Usual carp from Persimmon, just as well I don't give a flying fook about his "honest opinions" .

What on earth are SRK playing at, they issued a statement saying the PFS would be within 6 weeks on the 20th March. If I was RM I'd be asking for a reduction in their fees, it's a bl00dy shambles.

Applegate

They've already had a months leeway ! Once we finaly get the PFS it's followed by EIA & SIA & then Exploitation license. As there timelines are clearly rubbish I wonder how long they will really take, no point listening to the BOD as they seem to be clueless. At the next AGM they should be taken to task imo.

Yes soutie we did, Jay are gaining a very poor track record.

I can understand pi's bailing, some of it will be people top slicing, others moving on. Fact is Jay are proving utterly hopeless on timeframes so it's hardly surprising the SP is languishing. I still feel this project will come good but no longer take any notice of the management's statements on timings.

Spot on artyth.

He can't help himself Simon

Good find soutie.

I certainly don't see anything detrimental to JAY on this news.

Yes it was aimed at persimmon.

I am aware the Cali oil is heavier but, as you stated, that does not mean it is not commercial & as has been mentioned here several times "heavy" is very much in demand, the current price being somewhere between Brent & WTI. I just get fed up with him banging on about it.

I'm sure I'm not the only one who feels that way.

At no time have I ever stated it was light oil.

I've said in the past that Boblondon can get carried away sometimes but you are an outrage, you mention heavy oil blah blah despite posters here trying to correct you on your pathetic trail. Thought you were leaving the thread anyway >

I. mistakenly said RNS yesterday when I meant TR-1

On other holdings CF have held when they have divested themselves they have issued that note(as I believe) the last few digits of a holding does not mean they are out, they may just have a round number left, we don't know & yes MM's will have their float which allows them to play just the way it is.

boblondon, I'm a holder & not a deramper (i'm hurting at these levels) My point remains the same, I believe the stock i s undervalued but RBD need to. a prove what they have said & b. we need more data on MS as & when it becomes available. It's unfortunate that an II, who has lost it's clients a fortune has such an adverse effect on the SP in the short term but that's just the way it is. As I said before there's a lot of loose stock around, true value win's out in the end.

bobl, not being nasty but I can do Maths, we can all make numbers work, the last few digits mean nothing.

boblondon, stop ramping ! we don't know the situation re CF until such time as they issue an RNS. In the meantime there is an awful lot of stock sloshing around. The SP should re rate to a degree on test results from MS. The real value will come to fruition when they do what it says on the tin. They prove that their npv numbers are what they value an asset at. No more, no less.

persimmon

Goodbye, you have been a massive disrupter on this board, your final post just sums you up.

They must have been mightily impressed with the 1st drill to go straight onto a second before testing.

luckyman, there's been a hell of a turnover of shares in the last few weeks. CF may or may not be out but you're going to see profit taking on any rises for those fortunate to get in at the bottom or close to short term traders will take their percentage & move on.

True soutie, & they've picked the perfect time to do it. PI's are nervous enough anyway in case of delays. BOD's fault in many way's for their silence.
Presentation note in Jan ( reiterated today) still states PFS Q1 as did Bo at the PFD a mere matter of weeks ago. To slip from the timetable now will reflect badly on the BOD.

Lets hope so !

That's just a re-jig of the presentation posted on the Jay site in Jan. Can't see any changes from the original.

Way more trades than normal so I'm wondering if there's a leak ?