Of course I will assume it goes without doubt that the question a majority of posters here would like answered. Let's call it the Hemo Question doesn't even interest you. You are such a transparent ramper, but I congratulate you on your cover of Mr Reasonable. Well played S
Too many misrepresentation to count SCooper. Clem chambers isn't any sort of benchmark. I stated MY views before his YouTube was even posted or acted on. I simply said he has the view I have expressed. I don't take any advice from bb.
If antibodies have a short life. Immunity will not come naturally. It will come from a vaccine that needs follow up shots after a period. The vaccine then creates the herd immunity. It's then the way to achieve it and would have to be done thus. Frankly it's plan A as I agree herd immunity unlikely any other way and its not ideal but it's all we will have and is workable to get us out of this acute situation. Artificial vaccine herd immunity would be the best possible to alleviate an impossible situation and better than the alternative of testing alone.
SCooper, You persist in misrepresentation. I will assume they are deliberate. Keep up the ramping and assumptions as facts S One wonders just how lost you would be enrolling into a critical Thai king course. All at sea I suspect.
Not sure I fully agree but let's say broadly that may all be correct. Once herd immunity is confirmed there will be a lot less testing imv if not before. I maintain we will have a vaccine that is 50+% effective by end q1, 2021. Slight delay to my first this year prediction but looking good.
And must bear in mind it's not just an antibody testing issue. T cells are also at play in immunity. I think antibody reduction remedied by booster is fine. I don't see any problem that cannot be overcome unlike SCooper who says already NO vaccine. What's that!!
What is clear is that SCooper will do and say anything to close down all but positive discussion. I think the S has really shown his true colours over time as a ramper. A vaccine will not increase testing requirements but imv will reduce them in time and considerably so. Scooper of course want to close it down. There's no upside.
We may well need a booster or possibly Tcells will assist enough and make any need for a booster 6 months to 1 year. We don't yet know. To say vaccine is NO use already, really shows your true colours. Moves your abilitu to take sweeping assumptions and motivations up a degree SCooper. Getting quite clear youre a paid ramper.
If you keep saying a vaccine is completely useless it will make it true. Meanwhile the effort will proceed and I guarantee we will benefit from a vaccinevand one will prove 50+% effective.
I think, tables turned, we should call out this ramping group who wish to squash any questions anyway they can. OF course I'm joking but they aren't and snake SCoopper is getting desperate to rubbish any vaccine hope.
Not seen Sky or anything but you are once again trying your best at misinformation.
Firstly we need an effective vaccine that means 50% + is effective. It produces both an antibody and T cell response. With this working to promote the required initial immune response all that may be required is regular booster shots. You seem to imply none of the vaccines can manage the minimal bar and that's wrong. Ocford hsd i brlieve slresdy demonstrated enough antibofy and T cell response. The fact antibodies drop off is not an end game at all.
You do seem to be a snake as it's so typical you are desprtate to rubbish potential vaccine hopes and don't provide any detailed basis to refute.
Even IF a vaccine didn't give lengthy immunity we would simply get a booster a few months - likely to be between 4 and probably 6 months. So what!
So a vaccine meets its objectives with a bother shot as immunity fades. It will be interesting in the analysis when we know. Of course it doesn't help to have clear evidence over time that SCooper will always talk up any issue and attack variously those with questions, concerns and seen it all before misgivings.
Surely we ALL thought core nipt was buoyant and holding up well.We were given that and it was not true. Period. Of course the next phase is to accuse anyone with concerns to be part of a derailing group by the groupie group. Haha
These DCoopers self appointing cheer leaders are stopping any other discourse. If you persist you will be reported pmsl.
Hemo, thanks for your details and I do agree . Ask the company. I would also like to know although Bakky and DCooper will just be looking to put you on report.
Market reaction to TU gives the verdict. Period. Not difficult to see why the verdict was down. Doesn't mean the future is over though does it. It means today's news was what it was and most wet e disappointed and or surprised at aspects not as good as could 've expected.
I maybe a contradiction. I can accept I perhaps have a unique take on things but I can praise when delivery deserves it. On t h e other hand I think you are totally incapable of any critical thinking or comment. Just a yes man. That makes your views worthless Inc. Being told today our core nipt tailed off contradicts many posters created expectations. If you can't see any fault then unlike the majority you are a paid ramper. Get real!
Yup been saying that for months and Expect to be broadly correct on vaccine. We were slow and have not been giving visible timely info and aim to ramp up to 20000 and £1 mill starting Jan. 2021. Just in time for the deceleration to start.