Member Info for Trisor

That’s fine ExMS regarding your views on the funding but your motives are quite dark imo. You have never traded a share, are not invested in the company and are constantly berating each positive step the company takes to commercialise. There is something you are not disclosing and no amount of denial or obfuscation will persuade me otherwise

Ex Ms and that’s proper money to you? It’s nothing. As I said previously you get the funding how you can and Lanstead would not have invested here if they did not see big money

Firstly EXMS thanks. Secondly I was already invested prior to the Lanstead deal so your glib comment can be disregarded. Thirdly these are all chicken feed numbers as this commercialises. I’ve got lots of green boxes. UG no doubt spouting off about this and that. Nobody really understands why you guys stick around here. Well actually I do. And it’s nothing to do with being social warriors. You are both skimming here on low volumes. I look forward to the day you can no longer do that.

I’ll be a big buyer if this continues to fall. As the co makes more the higher the Sp you would hope that there will be some decent news over the next few months. If you give your shares to the likes of UG to trade for a few grand here and there….that’s your personal choices. He is trying to recoup his losses

Sorry Exms can you explain please? I think they have been granted all shares at a price of 0.55. Sorry if I have got that wrong. As you aware it’s irrelevant to me because longer term this goes large imo . DYOR

Not surprised by your comment RR. We are about on chapter 1 of This book of nanosynth and its new board.

From The Nanosynth website - commercialised let’s hope this is massive

“The Company’s proprietary technology uses a spinning disk reactor to control both the size and shape of their nanoparticles. Unlike competing nanotechnology production processes, such as hydrothermal synthesis, our process has the advantages of being highly efficient, highly scalable and able to dial in nanoparticles with a very good polydispersity, typically +/- 2 nm tolerance, quickly and efficiently”

Funniest poster on here is Sharebel. He is in and out with the Marketmakers. Where’s he gone?

I have just gone onto the Lanstead website . Seems to be back by ex jpmorgan , Goldman sachs players. Looks promising and I’m sure those guys want to make a lot of money .

Hi Dr M. I’m liking this filter thing. Stuck UG on it - the only one. Just finding his attitude really offensive and bitter and quite frankly there is enough negativity in the world!!

UG and Exms continue to throw daggers into the hearts of LTH’s. They just don’t care. They just want to rub salt into the wounds of people will averages over 1 penny. It’s truly amazing

ExMs thanks for your musings about 3 legged donkeys and the like. FYI I wasn’t invested previous to this change of direction. There’s real vision and strategy at play. There’s a pleasant end in sight imo. I’m sorry you can’t see it. What did they do to you fella? What did they do? (Cinematic melodramatic tone)

NFF

That’s because EXMS and UG take advantage of those spikes. They don’t want to buy in too high so they need nice drops to be in the game !

A few upset people on here. Desperate actually. On here all day, can’t see the opportunity . 100 percent burnt in some capacity by individuals at NNN (past or present) don’t go to AGMs to ask searching questions. Their modus ..try to depress the sp to their deemed acceptable bottom feeding levels, then keep quiet, then rinse and repeat . Just really sad

Sure EXms - they are putting structures in place to deal with orders. Hopefully before Xmas we see some further progress . You shouldn’t burst a gasket over this. After all everyone in this board is hoping or comfortable and any new views should do their own research, see all RNS’ and go to an AGM

Ofcourse it’s an if. But everything is an if i life. No sure things apart from death and taxes. I’ve seen enough to suggest an evolution in the business

Ps I don’t know what funding arrangements were looked at- perhaps this was the cheapest

Not particularly. It’s a risk yes. But there are enough signals of decent progress. I don’t mind a risk personally. Only invest what you can afford and then it’s never a “bust” situation

No I don’t ExMs because if the company takes off this arrangement will be insignificant in the scheme of things

Lanstead are in for the big bucks. It’s clear . They have no controlling stake in the company and they are funding the great work being done. This is a long term hold for me as I’ve mentioned in numerous occasions .