Member Info for Tripoddp

questions that remain unanswered:
why was the sample size for testing only 70 or was it 75 when lab results were showing such a promising ‘gold standard’ superior product ?
why has it, given such a small sample size, taken a year to collate/publish results?
Why has it taken so long for Porton Down to complete assessments of any of the Uk Tests.
why are Uk tests, showing to be at least better than the Innova ones, not being given emergency approval based on that fact whilst ongoing regulatory bodies make their final findings/certifications.
why have all the uk based/produced alternatives been held up by the regulatory approval process ( bar Novacyt who were originally passed over completely and only taken on board after WHO rating, certification and approval. and look where they are now and how they are being treated) when we have an undeniable urgent need for a better test.
Why are emergency procurement procedures a year into a global pandemic still being given as the excuse and avenue for continued ‘innova’ crap test purchasing despite their almost universal slating as utterly substandard?
Who are Tried and Tested a company recently set up and run from a three bedroom house in Northamptonshire?
Why are Tried and Tested being given preferential treatment in the procurement of (Innova) tests?
i’m sure there are many more questions that investors would also like answering. my faith is dwindling, not in the product,i see a good strong future for Avacta. However, given how things have gone for Novacyt last week, and given the shambles that is the UK govt and its apparent strangle hold on the infrastructure that is supposed to facilitate these things i’m beginnig to get a bad taste in my mouth. and as a share holder of all the uk companies in the Covid testing/treatment sphere i’m seriously considering reducing my exposure across the board.

breeding.....

moral of the story, never do business with the british govt! if you do, always get paid up front or tell them to sod off. i bet those dodgy PPE sellers and “innova test importer middle men” got paid up front. These Eton boys used to sh*t in one anothers tuck boxes for giggles and proof of britishness and breading.

‘Oh Boris, we’ve got it under control!’
‘Good oh, tell those job knockies over at NCYT they can sing for their sheckles, i’d rather spend that wedge with our mates over at Tried ‘n Tested , on a few more billion innova sh*t bag tests........ chocs away........tally ho.....!’

This is aim, if you see the value of the sp of an aim share rise by such a degree then you owe it to yourself to at least sell a percentage of your holding Volatility is a fact of life for companies in their infancy. TB has form, he will capitalize on such movements if the opportunity presents itself. He also continues to hold a chunk so investors should take some solace from that fact and be better prepared for the next opportunity as it arises. It is almost always a mistake to assume that the days of a lower sp are behind us after a big rise especially when there is no product in the marketplace. force yourself to sell some and you will 9 times out of 10 thank yourself afterwards when the price drops and you are still in the marketplace to top up again and potentially lower your average or indeed move on without taking too big a hit. buy in tranches and sell in tranches and manage the Fomo urge.

this board is becoming laughable all the abuse thrown back and forth and here there and everywhere. the ODX holders who were getting abused up until a few days ago are probably chuckling under there govt contract napkins now. Personally having held these since last march and profited last may and more recently having sold at 57, 69, 71,85,131 and 120. we should all remember that this is aim and there has been ample opportunity to take some profit along the way (without even closely catching the recent top/high). i still hold some and bought a few yesterday at 84 and will look to buy a few more if /when i perceive another bottom. bottoms and boobs are a little confusing though i do admit. buy in tranches, sell in tranches and read lots. never really post but the blocking up of these boards really leaves me wondering where the state of humanity is headed sometimes. GLALTH its easy to think the boat has left and i’m sure the window is diminishing and the competition broadening and thickening but this virus aint goin’ no where fast, i think there will be opportunities to sell higher than todays/ coming low.

berlin and Pembrokeshire

sooner or later they have to embrace the elephant in the room. it’s just not good enough to simply throw twice as many tests at the problem because the tests themselves are inadequate. whilst that maximizes profits still further for the relevant middle men it does little in terms of efficiency, time and infection rates. the whole thing needs sweeping aside and a proper adequate testing regime with a properly functional test (hopefully Avacta’s) utilized. why has it taken a year? and why after all this time was our test only tested against a batch of 30 tests? we would have done well to follow NCYT’s route and circumnavigate the Govt scheister brigade altogether. the uk govt only embraced NCYT’s pcr test after half the rest of the world had started using it.

Serco are much better at announcing their daily share buy backs and staff bonuses than they are at tracing contacts and while the continue to use the poor quality tests provided by their mates’ shell companies then the pandemic will continue to rage away just out of control. the slogans before safety party wouldn’t have it any other way, to be sure.

Check out MXC they recently completed a CBD trial with their ArtemiCTM Rescue, monitoring its effect regarding Corona virus. they’ve signed a three year deal with SwissPharmaCan who upped it by 80% within a matter of days.

https://apple.news/AVZduZxi0RYOs7mLX4YQ73A
I’ve emailed the author with some questions see below:
Dear Sabah Meddings, Why are you promoting Innova Tests? Why is there no accompanying investigatory reporting into the reasoning behind their continued purchase and supply despite their having been rubbished by the BMJ? They are a cheap chinese produced test with low efficacy. Why are uk produced tests being overlooked Avacta, Genedrive, Novacyt,Mologic,Paraytech, omega diagnostics, Abbngdon etc. Why are these tests stalling through the regulatory process? Who is profiting from the billions being spent on inneffective tests. Who profits from a pandemic that rages away just about under control but never actually quite being. Who are Innova? Who are ‘Tried and Tested’ a company set up ti import innova tests based in a three bedroom house in Finedon Northampton. There are many questions simply not being asked by mainstream media. People are dying! Perhaps needlessly. Profits are being made, perhaps excessively billions are being spent whilst wages stagnate and staffing numbers dwindle. I look forward to a response. Yours sincerely

Apparently -Innova tests already slated by BMJ for only being approx. 48% accurate. Apparently- supplied by Tried and Tested a company Apparently registered at a house in Finedon, Northamptonshire. meanwhile a number of better tests seem to be stalling through the regulatory process (like for almost a year). hmmm. a shell company? set up essentially to import the innova tests? and suck on the taxpayers future borrowing epidemic udder? for who’s gain? sovereign test my cod piece! the media should be all over this endless waste of money meanwhile those dying on the frontline get 1% more while politicians clap their buttocks together on a thursday from their balconies above! Proud........

not showing on text recognition as you type in the ticker on ii but if you press search/return it will come up on both trading and isa accounts.