Member Info for Trickymatters

Yes 26th July shows 2.75p for the sp. Does make a difference from 27th at 3.85. My mistake. Sold around 2.65 so that's a bit less of a hit for him. I might look him up. I was thinking of buying in. Feel more hesitant now.

Looks like Terry bought at the top- 27th July sp reached 4p. Sold near the bottom? Odd.

No. He can reject the claim vs the government; accept the claim vs the government or refer the decision back to government seeking particular clarification. The latter is allowed, though rarely acted upon. As I understand it having read the guidance for judicial reviews.

I think it will go our way. GLA.

It was 90% vs. You're getting really sad now Armageddon. It was 90% vs from those that voted. Don't assume everyone who didn't vote was for. I was vs the nonsense proposal for asset stripping from Hamoodi and didn't bother voting because I knew it would be an overwhelming vote for a sensible decision. As was the case. Maybe stop embarrassing yourself now.

Poots not Posts!

The market ain't jumping for joy today on news of the judicial review. Think it should go our way, not least because the law has changed anyway on the main focus of the challenge ie. the duty to consult the executive. And because one of the organising principles of a JR is that public bodies must be allowed to make decisions for the public good. And because really this was a decision about energy not the environment. The fact that the decision was given to the Dept for Agriculture, Rural Affairs and the Environment suggests that the duty to consult other affected parts of the executive has been clearly allowed for. Posts decided that the environmental impact was minimal. Energy security is most certainly a public good and doubly so given current circumstances with the Russian invasion of Ukraine and consequences for our cost of living. I actually think a Labour government under Starmer might have taken the same decision.

It's complicated though because the judge described the decision as complex and significant. The duty to consult refers to issues of significant cross cutting impact. But that duty is at the very least watered down by the new law. I am waiting till next week to buy some more though. If the decision goes vs the mms will have a field day imo for about a day. Then a fast recovery imo. So much good news coming in September. If it goes our way I expect the start of a good re-rate immediately.

Samsung didn't get away scot free did they? They had to pay $150million compensation you daft bint. £40 million of which will be coming to shareholders in February in the form of a special dividend and/or share buybacks. If you think the sp is staying down here within a couple of months you're even more daft than you show yourself to be with your endless whinging.

Samsung didn't get away scot free did they? They had to pay $150million compensation you daft bint. £40 million of which will be coming to shareholders in February in the form of a special dividend and/or share buybacks. If you think the sp is staying down here within a couple of months you're even more daft than you show yourself to be with your endless whinging.

Good plan LordWM. I will double my holding in the next couple of weeks. I expect the sp to start building fast substantially in anticipation of the Special Dividend. It will deliver a good return by February.

Buys to sells are coming up 7:1 today. Getting better. The trolls on this board are absolutely nuts. No-one likes their posts. They absolutely failed to have any impact on the vote but they post relentlessly all day, every day.

Thx v much Stokey.

The link doesn't work Stokey. Can you tell us what it says please?

You lost the vote decisively. Let's put it another way. You failed to influence anywhere near enough people. Give it up. It's over. Stop posting. Half of you sold some time ago. You're completely irrelevant.

Nanaco have another £35 million for their expansion in manufacturing on top of the proposed £40million payout to shareholders/and or share buy backs.

I know that Apple has stolen patents before. From Nokia which cost them $733 million. And the ITC has also upheld another challenge which Biden has endorsed. They are buying Nanaco's technology through a third party with a long established relationship as others have pointed out. I don't think they'd dare to try it again. The regulators will reach a tipping point when the fines will become prohibitive imho. I would have thought they will realise the damage to their reputation is becoming equally prohibitive. But, fair enough if you think otherwise. I am pointing out that you have no idea that this is their intention this time.

Why are you posting here Feeks if you aren't in? What's the point?

Of course I'll concede. I listened to the interview again and he said kroners when I thought he said orders. A mistake. But you are still making up the costs and margins as you go along😅 We'll find out on Monday. You don't need to invent stuff Croner.

Troublesome, I am pleased if the sp goes up. Even more pleased if it retains it's improving price. The news in the macro environment this week is not doing equities any good. I am confident that the sp will recover however. I think sentiment will return once we get some solid news - that will bring some more bulls in and blow the little tiny shorters playing with CFDs out of the water. That's why I encourage those who know their eggs on this technology to keep on keeping on.

You're still twisting the issue. I meant that trolls like you will undermine any company. Anyone can think the worst of others. It's not hard. It's sad though.

No, I'm not that new Nano. Certainly been in long enough to have read far too much of your boring, cynical crap.

Whatever information the company put out you can undermine and dismiss. Anyone could. It's not hard to do that. Eventually when it's relentless enough people can lose confidence. Oldest trick in the book for shorters.

Apple have deferred the launch of some of their new products partly because of a lack of some supply. Nanoco are a minnow next to Samsung. But they took them on and won. Nanoco had patented products that Samsung wanted enough to steal. And they had to pay out for that. I don't think Apple will steal- as your nasty post also implies. They aren't buying directly from Nanoco as you well know.

I will be averaging down within a couple of months. If you manage to push the sp down a bit more it's irrelevant to me.

Kroner not orders then! So now you're making up costs as you go along Cromer😆 We'll find out on Monday when they publish their accounts which they've brought forward- so clearly keen to share that information.