Member Info for tricky1276

Man alive !!! This board has gone quite. Is it somethong I have said?

Hi Spikeyj .Thanks for reply. I have no problem with traders ,I trade myself sometimes. But I manage to do it without scaremongering / innuendo / seeking suggestive negative advice / lies. If a trader cannot survive without the above they should not be trading and all of the above absolutely cannot be allowed to pass without comment. A few examples -- "institutions dumping" "sub20" "sub10" " cash in dodgy banks" " what price the rights issue (implied) " etc etc etc . To ignore would sanction bullying moronic tactics. I find it very significant that none of the "traders" have commented on the Gardener post too embarrassed no doubt

Just thought that the blog from Mr Gardner would give you self indulgent juvenile lager louts a clue of how to formulate a blog. I realize that I am wasting my time because you all will continue to indulge in your delusional. double acts. Delusional because you clearly believe that your rantings will impact the sp when in reality not one iota of difference will be made.( the same applies to me ) Unfortunately the Gardner post goes for longer than one line and contains some long words so I doubt that your attention span will be up to it. But give it a try.

Gardner what a pleasure to read a well reasoned balanced and sensible post. Makes a change from the one liners presently infecting this board. Thanks.

Some bizarre posts today . Has a hot line to the institutions. Mentioned shorts / shorting at least 4 times. Lost count of the number of subs , but the most bizarre was the estimate for sub 20 @19.45 then sub 10 @ 20.09 with no trading taking place !! Most of it in an infantile gobbledegook pidgin cipher . I vowed that I would not filter any poster, but I have not got any more time for familyguy

I presume this refers to me. Suck what up exactly?

Well they have issued the RNS, but it is the wrong one for you guys . No towel in sight.

are getting really carried away with yourselves , very triumphant Two things are missing here , where are the dancing girls ( yes I know they are on another website) The other thing missing here is an RNS from the company throwing in the towel. Until then I would cool down all the self congratulation . Save it for the RNS.

downbutnotout. Broken 34 next stop 32p or lower depending on markets . So it is nothing to do with Globo fundamentals !!! What sort of idiocy is this ? Market down today Globo above 34. You appear very confident in your analysis, please explain the anomaly .

Utterly pointless issuing an RNS. This is a glowing endorsement of a Globo product, so the "market" will undoubtedly go into free fall. What a joke, as I have stated before this market is not fit for purpose.

Jolly, as per usual you are pedaling the snake oil .1) " no point in fighting the trend " ( so please give up and sell your shares ) 2 " no reward without risk ". What exactly does all this this mean ? In the first instance you are saying follow the crowd , which is absolutely a guaranteed route to disaster . In the second instance you are contradicting yourself . You mostly have a reasonably clear standpoint , please make up your mind , you are letting yourself down .

In answer to your question does capitalism have principles ?No capitalism does not have principles . In fact when they bailed out the banks and started printing money it ceased to exist.

Hi jolly , quite here because nothing we put into print will effect the sp which is being impacted by much more powerful forces than our measly words. I find your comment " GBO's sp is in critical state ( perhaps even the business is ", very interesting. Is this a rare admission from you that the sp is not reflecting reality ? The use of the word perhaps would certainly indicate this. Surely the sp is supposed to reflect the fundamentals of the business in this instance you appear to be stating that it does not. Obviously much hinges on on any large acquisitions ,but you are not crediting the companies very successful experience / track record as a result of the purchase of Notify & Sourcebits ( admittedly smaller ) in the US. This is a high growth company the use of junk debt is not out of the question. the multiplier effect of a successful acquisition would be a game changer . They have not even made an announcement of a purchase yet , but the sp reflects a dumb acquisition . Costis has a great track record it is highly unlikely that he will make a drastic mistake

I find it very illuminating when a share takes instantaneous dips and equally immediate recovery , as instanced today at 1300 & 1455 hours. Nobody would assume that these movements were spontaneous they are indicative of a share being manoeuvred down by tripping stop losses. Shorters are aware that some investors buy or sell on technicals so they are desperate for further falls . they have failed we finished level.

Not a sucker. This has been the routine exercise in squeezing out weak holders before the results .

You appear to have misread the rns. They reduced by approx 3m. I read nothing sinister in that.

Hello Upper. Possibly we are misunderstanding each other, but you appear to be under the impression that shorting activity has had no impact on this share. In reply to my post on Friday about shorting Ridingwaves summed it up very nicely when he stated " Shorters suppress natural demand and therefore create an unbalanced market ". That really should not need to be stated as it is absolutely obvious.

Supply and demand only applies on a level playing field , the demand side here has been clamped by all the shorters games. Simples. Makes no difference if you can afford to hang on and add at lows, the shorters have got to buy back eventually.

I am sure that sebwood and Jolly would be the first to defend the thoroughly honourable practice of shorting ,since they obviously attempt to take advantage of it. In reality shorting is is creating market distortions and is probably negatively impacting the real economy. The mere fact that a share is being shorted ,even if the reasons for the shorting are entirely illegitimate will tend to deter potential investors . Whereas the investment houses that indulge in shorting are regulated by the "authorities" they are being piggy backed by assorted shysters and scum who are not regulated. These shysters are free to do their very best to spread fear and consternation to fleece their own nest . This is inherently unfair. Shorting is a bizarre concept , why is it possible to sell something that you do not own ? i am sure that if I set up a system to short the governments beloved housing market and sold short a shed load of frothy London properties the "authorities " would rapidly put a stop to it . Indeed I believe they banned the shorting of banks during the peak of our recent ( and continuing ) financial crisis, so they are very selective in what they allow. How many small and medium sized companies are there that are looking for finance to expand and create employment ? They have the choice of the banks that are very unlikely to assist in the present environment or perhaps a listing .The primary function of the market is after all to raise funds . They will take a look at the negative implications of a listing as exampled by all the shorting and decide that the market is not fit for purpose, so further enterprise and employment is put on hold. Jolly you state that doubts expressed by your mate TW over QPP were not misplaced . Think again,they were the best part of a billion $ misplaced . The man is a complete buffoon.

This share normally dips or trades sideways between the trading update and the actual results in September . This is all entirely normal and (yawn ) expected. The only way the shorters can win is if they can entice some volume selling Jolly (who I believe claims to be a holder ? ) is on here to assist the shorters in this regard, this is patently obvious.