The latest Investing Matters Podcast with Jean Roche, Co-Manager of Schroder UK Mid Cap Investment Trust has just been released. Listen here.
Interesting activity here . Market down this up. Shorters taking the chance to buy some back ? Be interesting to see the disclosures next week
The volume is a joke. Nobody is selling , and they are certainly getting none of mine.
price stable / rising , limited exposure to oil anyway . Great fundamentals / no debt . Why is is so low ? Way oversold IMO
Seems to happen a lot check out sse & cpg . Be very interested what happens tomorrow . I tried to buy cpg but the cheeky B's offered a price minus the div.
for future earnings / growth, and you get a div . Has to be a buy. Mostly thinly traded so strongly held, can surge with some more positive updates / contracts.
increasingly coming to the conclusion that the " report " is a stunt to enable shorters to exit at bargain basement prices. I am long here and I will be adding if there are any further falls. I take comfort in the fact that institutions have recently been adding to long positions. I believe that the following points are based on commonsense rather than bias 1) They admit to a short position . What about some transparency , what size is the short and when was it opened ? They might be short one share. 2) The "report" is marked private and confidential so how did tw gain advanced knowledge of it ? This obviously smacks of collusion. 3) Assuming they are short how likely is that the "report" will be balanced and fair. 4) The reason for the change of auditors was explained by RNS on 6th March 2014. Competitive tender of three of the top five auditors is a thoroughly acceptable reason to change auditors and is easily verified . 5) Are they stating that the new auditors are party to fraud ? 6) Are they aware of the catastrophic penalties that can be inflicted on auditors by the regulators if the above is true ? 7) Do they not realize that the auditors will be aware of the controversy surrounding this share and that they will be very eager to double and treble check the accuracy of the audit ? 8) GBO is a British listed company . Would their accusations not have had more credence if they were made within a British jurisdiction ?
Oh!! A report .Trepidation, anxiety , timorous, foreboding. Oh!! Its from tw. Apprehension, cower , cringe, flinch. Oh!! Its overdue. Chilcot, con, manipulation, unscrupulous, exploitation, stunt, abuse,
character really should get his story straight , he complains about the amount of cash on the balance sheet then attempts to cast aspersions when they attempt to spend it !! He complains about the change of auditors without explaining the reason for it , which was that the work was put out to competitive tender and the best value auditor won. Seems utterly reasonable to me !! He sites QPP as one of his successes . No doubt he was a zero pence nay sayer . This company has the best part a billion $ on its balance sheet and is presently in the process of returning ( hopefully ) + 1£ / share to holders. This was one of his successes , what of his failures !! Personally I rather hope this sp hovers quite low for a few months. More buying opportunities and it restricts the shorters chances to rinse and repeat . Meanwhile they will be paying juicy fees on their short position.
Spikeyj My post was referenced to Jolly if he is incapable of making a reply by erm lets say Monday I am more than ready to enter into debate with you. i would value your opinion ,but I would prefer one from Jolly . The other relevant thread is US
Hi Jolly thanks for reply. Pretty obvious why the points refer to you . If somebody in any walk of life was utilizing my name and I was aware of it and I did nothing about it by default it becomes my problem. By not refuting his posting you by default are acknowledging its validity. Try and wriggle out of that. I await your response.
Jolly thank you for your reply. Some comments --- How do you know I have not added? How do I know that you have brought @25 and sold @ 29? Am I interested? Have you answered the main slant of my post ? Which was that you are tainted by your association with the pond life. You have not addressed the fact that they are taking your name in vain and riding on your coat tails . You have not answered my post and remain tainted. My maths tells me that 10p is + 300% . Kindly address the 10p / 17p/ 20p references from the pond life utilizing your name.
rates no change, should ease the GBO negotiations for the bond issue. What a farce the supposedly independent central bankers in their haste to back up flawed government policies have backed themselves into a corner they cannot lower rates and now they have come realize that they cannot raise them!!!. What next ? To change tact, this board was infiltrated by pond life earlier in the week I have filtered the main offender so no further comment in that regard since no right of reply. However the respected poster Jolly does not come out of this smelling of roses. The pond life have a need to bounce questions off him, example ~~~~ downside 20p JBM 10p . Whats the free carry Jolly 17p . I can find no confirmation from Jolly with reference to the above figures equally I can find nothing to refute them . Whats the score Jolly are they taking your name in vain ? At present you are approx 300% incorrect. Distinctly unimpressive,
From the title of your post i think I know who you are referring to. Just filter , the poor guy has an ego problem no doubt boasting about the fortune he is making . The only time I have used the filter .
Yes Spikeyj , fair comment. I also have doubts about TA and only refer to it rarely . After all if it actually worked there would be no point in the market especially on AIM , probably has some partial use for large cap companies on the main market which are less vulnerable to wild swings. Personally I am not too bothered by falls here . I try and take a long term view for any share that I buy into. Have held some shares in excess of 25 years ( South African ) OK the recent Rand weakness has been a bit of a blow but most have paid for themselves many times over from div income. I have got no confidence in the UK economy anyway . Don't believe anything they tell you.
Man alive !!! This board has gone quite. Is it somethong I have said?
Hi Spikeyj .Thanks for reply. I have no problem with traders ,I trade myself sometimes. But I manage to do it without scaremongering / innuendo / seeking suggestive negative advice / lies. If a trader cannot survive without the above they should not be trading and all of the above absolutely cannot be allowed to pass without comment. A few examples -- "institutions dumping" "sub20" "sub10" " cash in dodgy banks" " what price the rights issue (implied) " etc etc etc . To ignore would sanction bullying moronic tactics. I find it very significant that none of the "traders" have commented on the Gardener post too embarrassed no doubt
Just thought that the blog from Mr Gardner would give you self indulgent juvenile lager louts a clue of how to formulate a blog. I realize that I am wasting my time because you all will continue to indulge in your delusional. double acts. Delusional because you clearly believe that your rantings will impact the sp when in reality not one iota of difference will be made.( the same applies to me ) Unfortunately the Gardner post goes for longer than one line and contains some long words so I doubt that your attention span will be up to it. But give it a try.
Gardner what a pleasure to read a well reasoned balanced and sensible post. Makes a change from the one liners presently infecting this board. Thanks.
Some bizarre posts today . Has a hot line to the institutions. Mentioned shorts / shorting at least 4 times. Lost count of the number of subs , but the most bizarre was the estimate for sub 20 @19.45 then sub 10 @ 20.09 with no trading taking place !! Most of it in an infantile gobbledegook pidgin cipher . I vowed that I would not filter any poster, but I have not got any more time for familyguy
I presume this refers to me. Suck what up exactly?