Member Info for TrevorBrooking

Castle, the operating loss of 12.2 includes impairment of investment costs , acquistion costs etc, the actual in-going operating losses were 4.4

Castle, nice to see you back! As you are always keen to discuss Syme (and Rosie appears to not have responded) would you care to enlighten us with your thoughts on Divvyups excellent post from yesterday? Especially as this could be a huge parts of Syme's future:

Divvyup

Posts: 370

Price: 0.08

No Opinion

RE: SYME - The “Snowball Effect” is Coming!! Close All Shorts’Wed 14:23
O Rosie We know were good to go for some time yet.
If I may distract you. Any chance of debating the growing trend of asset tokens within supply chains.
An area pretty much under the radar although gathering momentum.
Like many I enjoy following the advancements within the fintech community and good to see SYME is not alone
Example from my research archive.
https://usa.bnpparibas/en/apollo-and-athene-enter-into-strategic-relationship-with-bnp-paribas-to-launch-eliant-inventory-solutions/

Question 1 (stable coin tokens) I’ll start with an easy one….
https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/vechain/markets/
What are your views with syme work throughs with other platforms utilising stable coin tokens, or even your thoughts of future engagement with Crypto Launchpools.
ATB

Castle, are you Rosie's parrot? You just seem to repeat everything he says! For your benefit I will repost my earlier answer to Rosie which you appear to not have read: please let us know what part of this you disagree with.

You prove my point Rosie, why would market makers offer me 0.08 today if they think they'll be able to get them for 0.05 in a few weeks? It's because they don't believe they'll be able to get them for 0.05 - so they're not expecting a big sell off are they?

Rosie, going to discuss with Divvyup his post re asset tokens, after all its very relevant to Syme and you are very keen to discuss Syme? Or do you just pick and choose?

You prove my point Rosie, why would market makers offer me 0.08 today if they think they'll be able to get them for 0.05 in a few weeks? It's because they don't believe they'll be able to get them for 0.05 - so they're not expecting a big sell off are they?

I think Rosie's head just exploded! Boss, how do I answer this one?

Well Rosie, if you don't know the answer to your question then you should hang your head in shame and leave the board! Everyone else (including the market makers) know what the price will be, do you think they haven't built it into today's price? They're not stupid. answer me this, why would MM be prepared to offer me 0.08 today if they think they'll be able to get them for 0.05?

RosieNas

Posts: 1,823

Price: 0.08

No Opinion

RE: SYME - The “Snowball Effect” is Coming!! Close All Shorts’06 Jul 2022 13:56
TB - what price will Venus be buying at again?

Rosie, any shares not taken up in the OO will be subscribed to by Venus (they have made a commitment to this as per RNS) - why on earth would be there a dump? I strongly suggest you stop your scaremongering and stick to facts.

Rosie, you forgot to add "in my opinion" - there are many that have an opposing view to you. There is no evidence that Venus will sell down, it has been stated that they are investors in the company. Can you point to anything that states that Venus intend to sell down?

Thanks for the summary, appreciated

Rosie, I really don't understand this obsession you have with a boiler room - it just doesn't exist. What does exist is a group of people allegedly with no financial interest in this share that pound it day in day out, that's a lot more suspicious than a bunch of investors looking for the positives in their investment.
The obvious conclusions are then that either you, Castle etc have a financial incentive for seeing the share fall, or you have some serious personality issues, or most likely, both.

In fairness Castle you have to be corrected quite often

Castle, further proof you've lost the plot today, your original post of 8.29 is still there!

Castle, a 40% dilution is a 40% dilution, it's irrelevant how many shares there were to start with! You really are starting to look foolish here....

Castle, you clearly need to go to night school and learn how to read. I never said the 40% dilution was irrelevant. You asked for an example where there had been a 40% dilution and the share price went up. Havoc gave you an excellent example but you claimed it wasn't valid because the number of shares in issue was different. My comment was that the number of shares in issue was irrelevant, it was the % dilution that was important. So how does that translate into me saying that a 40% dilution would have no effect on Syme? I would love to hear your valid explanation or a retraction.

Castle, at times your stupidity dumbfounds me, what on earth does that post have to do with what you are talking about?

Castle, please show me a post where I said any dilution will have no effect on the SP- yet more of your lies AGAIN!

Castle, do keep up and stop prattling on about chairmen etc, all in the past. You might as well be asking why Henry 8th didn't see a marriage counsellor.
Looking forward to your balanced view of the AGM, I won't be able to attend due to work commitments but understand you have managed to fit it in around your visits to the job centre.

Ex, in your investment world I suppose you would value Uber, a loss making company at nil? An allegedly experienced investor like yourself should understand that the market is forward looking.

Castle, your walls are starting to crumble around you, you're starting to sound desperate now