Member Info for Trent700

I really should proofread. I meant HunSen, and into sgc

Hi BunSen

Yes, that's my take on things as well.

I'm into STD & Lloy as well. Both too are down. Like you, I've got it down to current political turmoil over Brexit and I suspect that a lot of investors are spooked and panic selling and cutting there losses which I suppose is understandable.

I would say it one is in a buying position, now would be a perfect storm for topping up to average down.

I'm expecting getting access to some of my pension pot soon so I will be looking for a few cheeky top ups on my holdings.

Hope your nerve and all the best for the new year to my fellow holders.

Trent700

The same to you too,Martin . And to my fellow SGC investors. A merry & peaceful Christmas to all, & a prosperous New year.

I think that's what I will do.

That's all well and good, Crowcast but you seem to be criticising other people as well as myself that do not share your narratives, which is fair enough, you are free to do that, yet most of the posts you are putting on here that I have bothered to read fully is full of simple typing errors, which suggests to me that you are clearly not bright enough to check what you are saying, to make sure that you have it right yet you still try to be a smart @rse

Maybe you should look deeper into your own shortcomings and improve on them, then you might be in a better position to criticise.

Directed at Crowcast mate.

Hi Vinfizz

As SGC are now soon to be a predominantly uk based company, the political turmoil here would be my guess as for why it's dropped.

I'm in to Lloyds & Marston's as well, again, those are both predominately I'm based too and it's the same story with them too.

Yes, let's see what the new year brings.

On the plus side, we are fast approaching a peak trading time for us, people in the supermarkets stocking up on festive cheer. A perfect time for our ales finding their way into customers shopping trollies. Then there's our pubs after the supermarkets close.

I like you all am a little disappointed in the falling sp, but like others here, I suspect that like myself, other people's holdings are down too.

In the meantime, if I don't post before the main event, (kids at home for the Christmas break). I'd like to wish you all a merry & peaceful Christmas & s prosperous New year.

Trent.

Perhaps you should put the same effort into proofreading your comments before you post them if you are going to try to criticise others

Then you won't have put a second comment in to correct it as an afterthought.

If you're going to try to be a smart @rse, you need to put more of an effort in.

I think you are wrong, but we shall see. I also point you out to Urraca's post. He gave you a more detailed response than Idid, yet you describe his post as only "illusory". Those, to me looked like cold hard facts, but I don't think that you & I are going to agree here, so perhaps we should agree to disagree.

economic analysis shows that the option based on WTO rules not only brings us substantial gains from free trade – as well as control of our laws and borders – but it also implies the very opposite of chaos; and most importantly of all, it can be implemented without any assistance from a plainly uncooperative EU. This makes it highly attractive. All that remains is to convince our lawmakers of these points and to that end Economists for Free Trade have just published a report explaining the advantages

The WTO has had a long-existing function to police non-discrimination in tariffs via the Most Favoured Nation principle. But the WTO has also in recent years produced three path-breaking sets of rules to codify and enforce non-discrimination in trade standards for goods and services, and to streamline border procedures.

When it comes to the UK and EU’s trade relations after Brexit, WTO law is very clear. There can be no discrimination in standards laid down by the EU or the UK; once a ‘domestic’ standard has been imposed it must be generalised to foreign countries’ exporters, without discrimination between them. This implies, for example, that if a UK exporting industry obeys such a standard, it cannot be told there is another standard to meet. To do this, the EU would have to change the whole EU-wide standard that is being applied – which would of course provoke widespread opposition (besides being damaging to EU consumers, given that the previous standard was a good one). The same is true for the UK. Notice too that any standard changes can be challenged in the WTO and the international standard-setting bodies.

I could go on, but this wasn't difficult to research.

LTI, that's cool. A nice, peaceful time to you anyway. :-)

*Keep smiling ;-)

Hi Jhub.

Well, it wasn't me that suggested the Guinness boycott, but being the oppotunist, I suggested looking for Marston's branded cask ales, (purely as a holder of Marston's, you understand), but if you have to get on a Stagecoach peasant wagon to your local supermarket to stock up for the Christmas festivities, I've had a good result.

Keep ??

A merry Christmas to all fellow shareholders.

Yes, boycott Guinness.

As a holder of Marstons, I can recommend a lot of top quality cask ales, and beers

Hi Snige.

On its own, Brexit was certain to have short/medium term headwinds. No one with a reasonable level of intellect would say That would not happen. That much is a given.

However, had David Cameron put serious thought into what the consequences of calling the referendum would be if, as we had voted out and then put some kind of contingencies in place,then, there would have been some kind of starting point in place as to what the next steps might be. But he didn't. He just gambled on a foregone conclusion that we would overwhelmingly vote to remain inside the EU.

So what does he do, he does not deal with the fact that his massive gamble has not paid off, instead, he immediately runs away like a coward, leaving Theresa May to clear up the mess. This is the only thing I personally feel sorry for her for.

That said, if she was.stronger willed, she could have used this to make a massive name for herself in the history books by getting her team together and planned an efficient and orderly exit then started to immediately execute those plans.

As I've said in the short to medium term, there will have been turbulence, but this will have subsided once a clear, set of plans have been put into place.

But she hasn't, she's talked the talk over seems to have done little else.

You asked Tell me which one would have crashed us out on WTO?

The WTO is there for all to use, and works well for all those concerned. As I've said in my previous post, I accept that these things take time to set up, but equally, the long term gain to our economy has to be worth the work.

Regards,

Trent.

Hi SUFCESSEX.

All of this could have been put to bed a long time ago, or at the least the Country could have been much further down the line than we are with a Margaret Thatcher, Winston Churchill style character running the show and delivering what the majority voted for.

Yes, in the short/medium term there will have been headwinds and turbulance, as there will be when this incompetent Muppet T. May actually gets round to understanding what is expected of her and assuming she delivers. (Which I still remain to be convinced that she will).

What, to me seems to be overlooked by remoaners is that we will still be trading with the bloc, but under WTO terms and not the EU's,. To say nothing of the other Countries standing in line waiting to set trade agreements up with us. Yes, they will take time to set up, but the long term rewards to our economy has to be worth the short term pain.

With all that in mind, now is the perfect time to buy into Companies now, if you can afford to just hope your nerve for long term gains.

What a load of bo****ks. Brexit is not the problem.

Weak, indecisive, incompetent politicians are the problem by causing unnecessary uncertainty.

A strong, bloody minded driven politician will have had this nailed by now, and we'd be looking at an entirely different story.

It's been over 2 years of incompetence by a remainer p1ssing about not knowing weather to scratch her head or her @are that is causing the problems we are facing at this time.

They are using the money to reduce debt.

Should reflect well on the share price today.