GMET vs POW - Investment Case10 Jan 2025 15:22
Just looking at that GMET £750,000 funding @ 30p the other day. Another great move from Oliver to secure further favourable financing at prices multiples higher than the IPO price but it does ask the following question to me.
So the £750,000 financing gave Premier Miton another 2% of GMET (they already hold GMET shares I think).
Now lets just say they took £750,000 on the market via POW shares instead. Of course an amount that large would have to have been taken in several bites over several days and would have likely pushed the POW SP up to say 20p in this market. Lets say for the purpose of this point that they would have taken £750,000 by the time they finished buying POW on the market at a 16p average. That would be circa 4% of POW the would have acquired for £750,000 worth of on market buys.
Now as POW hold 43.2% of GMET today (plus warrants), if Premier Miton bought £750k POW shares on the market instead of financing GMET, they would have had a indirect GMET holding via their 4% POW holding of around 1.75%.
My argument would be, that at current GMET & POW levels, Premier Milton have taken 2% of GMET, but they could have taken 1.75% via investing the same money in POW, but also had direct exposure to Uranium, Saudi Assets, FDR, GSAe, Tati JV etc. etc.
Just makes the investment case in POW far more appealing that investing directly in GMET to me at these levels, but the market currently doesn't think so and neither do Premier Miton haha