Member Info for toshack

It looks like the game's up.If not why are the Directors not buying.Hope I am wrong but it is like the previous incumbents.

These or the lack of them should have been an indication of the performance of the firm over the past 14 months.One purchase of �5000 and one sale of �26000.Like many fellow holders I have continued to hold with hope rather than expectation.

Beginning to look black and reminescentof DB's time.

I think that mentioned investing for income.I really think that there is no need for such offensive remarksbut at least this post willgive you another opportunity to engage in nasty negative comments rather than offering some answer to genuine questions.

Thanks for your response.I think many small holders have already written off this share.One must feel sorry for those who have invested substantially on the advice of optimistic comments on this forum particularly if they have borrowed to make their investments.The lesson to be learned is that individual research is essential.For my part my portfolio is entirely blue chip to generate income apart from my holding in reds which was undertaken as a punt and like most punts seems likely to fail.

Yes I agree but my question is what are the implications. Are they good news for the many small investors on this forum.

Once again I am appealing for some explanation about the implications of the recent rush of RNS.Many thanks.

If an error has been made in the RNS then the logical response for the management is to correct the message .It is not a hanging offense.If it is an error that is not corrected then we entitled to fear the worst.

Many thanks for the explanation.

i think there will be many on this chat line who like myself are confused by the meaning of the many RNS's that have been issued over recent days.Could anyone please explain in plain English what it all means,either on this site or in another RNS.

In view of the interest being shown in this company can anyone explain why the share price is finding it difficult to make any permanent advance.

No but it is commonplace for news to be reported in the media as to why a share's price falls by a substantial margin.Shareholders are entitled to know why the price has fallen and the BOD should recognise that they are working on behalf of the shareholders..I previously alerted members on this forum that all was not well under the previous managementl but was attacked by the usual suspects on the grounds of being alarmist Once again history looks to be being repeated and what I need to know is whether there are any grounds for alarm.

No but it is commonplace for news to be reported in the media as to why a share's price falls by a substantial margin.Shareholders are entitled to know why the price has fallen and the BOD should recognise that they are working on behalf of the shareholders..I previously alerted members on this forum that all was not well under the previous managementl but was attacked by the usual suspects on the grounds of being alarmist Once again history looks to be being repeated and what I need to know is whether there are any grounds for alarm.

Perhaps posting a message on this site would have been appreciated.Also in the light of the trading update the response of the market on the very first opportunity is very concerning .Additionally I woiuld like to ask Canard if he has failed to notice the relentless fall in the price of the share over the greater part of this year and doesn't this raise a scintilla of alarm.It certainly has for many others.We are entitled to express such views.

Have been concerned about performance for some months and have asked for information from BOD.I think we are now entitled for an explanation of the performance of the company and some insight re this big fall in price.

I think you would be better asking 'What is going on in Reds?' rather than what is the problem with google finance.I think that the CEO should read the forum to get a flavour of the views of those who have remained loyal to the company and failure to do so smacks of arrogance.

Good to see that you have come round to my own thoughts that something is not quite right with this company.

Once again hopes are dashed.What will it take to secure a positive response to what appears to be good news.My concerns remain.

Most unlikely 4ps since I live in the frozen North.

Kit the purpose of my post is to remind people that on the advice of 4ps many people swallowed the message that Coms under the control of DB was a sound investment which led people to buy shares in Coms at prices up to 10p.I tried to warn people that all did not look right with the firm that was claimed to be doing well whilst the price steadily declined - and was attacked in posts similar to your post. As for your post JK3 you seem to confirm that that MB is doing well and do not acknowledge that many Board members are part timers whose pro rata rates are quite good.Before anyone else chirps in I have substantial holdings in this firm and continue to hold because there is no alternative and I can afford to hold but not everyone is in this position.