Member Info for TorquayFan

Since the 22/7 RNS, there have been some great posts here about the update but not so much discussion as I had expected. Also noticeable is the absence of comment in press/media coverage compared to other recent occasions.

It's unconscionable that Team Scancell have simply neglected ot forgotten such fun ! What's happened? OR is it that Scancell are already in a stage of progress with active significant contacts with all the Folks that really matter, that a media splurge is superfluous? Some of the bodylanguage/words in last week's Investor presentation might suggest the latter . . . who knows?

Ponsonb - yes I too filtered scinv long ago. I doubt that adverts were part of the 'motivation' behind the assault on the BB and Scancell - surely most of us deploy 'AdBlock' or similar. Anyway, very good riddance to scinv and I hope his departure is permanent. Once he had shown himself, it's MO that even those that tried to help/explain gave him the oxygen to continue. However did he manage to continue his mischief for so long?

c11 - if scin had been filtered widely months ago we'd have a much better bb right now. the replies to scin, the help and the ******** give him oxygen. i share your feelings about the ai and i am with regret, about to filter cleaner too, which is sad as otherwise she is a helpful poster.

the bb is an important forum for many lth - i'm disappointed to say the least.

An interesting list over there :-

""Write down all the positives

Needle Free

Cheap to manufacture

No toxicity

New Patent

Works with any checkpoint inhibitor that would be approved

Does not target the TME but the cancer (competition)

Can be used in adjuvant and will work setting

Can be used in Neo-adjuvant and will work in that setting

Can be used in Pre-cancer lesions no formal evidence yet

But patients are our trials may have these lesions which can be monitored

Un Met Need

Saves Lives

Supported by the NHS and Gov.

Likely get accelerated approval and probably Orphan status

Sits in 10% corp tax patent box

Negatives

Stuck on the AIM market"" (Caps added).

One more positive occurs to me - the logistics of a Scancell vaccine are much easier than for an mRNA alternative with storage at 'room' temperature rather than -58C, (or whatever it is).

GLA

The 'Filters' tab is just 2" above the last message. Simply type in the name and apply. ATB

Breaking even - it's important to recognise that things have changed. Scancell now has plenty to attract partnerships and deals and hopefully before too long. Today's SP doesn't really matter. I'm looking forward to the heights that will surely come before too long.

I think we should offer our congratulations to the CSO - Prof. Lindy must again be feeling happily vindicated with the publication of these 'extremely exciting' results, the latest pinnacle of her outstanding career achievements to date. What an amazing Scientist! Hopefully she will one day achieve the widest recognition she truly deserves.

Hi Friggs. Maybe today looks 'likely' for news BUT there's another 9 days until this 'later in July' target from the CEO expires. But GLA

Interesting observation Johnny and thanks. Enthralling possibilities to ponder . . .

Violin - its a 'wait and see' of course, but no need to fret IMO.

Just to add a general comment, our 'new' CEO has certainly shaken things up since he arrived. No doubt he has the same energy and ambitions on putting deals together!! ATB

Greenshaw - PLEASE stop the AI posts. Filtered.

OK thanks.

Hi Ivy. 'TG' ?? ATB

Ivy. You don't post often here. Yes P27.

Cleaner - good work as ever.

Ruck re. your 06.52, I see no facts or conclusions from 'My Take' that have added to my own position on Scancell - it just recaps some positives that I am aware of already from following matters brought normally to these BB's.

I don't know what is behind your sudden interest here other than your usual fun to 'ride the waves' and to quibble in detail. Have you given up on baiting Inan on the other side?

I have politely stated my doubts about AI, (which can't seem to get some basic matters right sometimes). I considerably doubt that AI speculation about Scancell's future commercial opportunities or about Prof. Lindy's work on the very borders of Science have any relevance or can provide insights here.

For me, AI posts demean the discussion here, which has over the years been very helpful. BTW your 08.58 is purely tendentious. I just don't have the time and energy for this so I'll filter, not out of pique, but because such discussion is just too tiresome.

Ruck re. "So you prefer the biased, abusive claptrap from some to this?" Please explain (briefly FGS), why you ask that question? Of course, I don't 'prefer' "biased, abusive claptrap".

Greenshaw. Please desist from posting AI generated material on here. We've been AI free for a while and the discussion on the BB has been much improved. Just for your info, I have scinv of filter permanently, after his persistent efforts to stir things up.

I'm very interested in your own thoughts. ATB

Thanks Cleaner. That's new to me at least - and IMO a brilliant talk through by CEO. I'll listen again tomorrow, ATB

Whoops - that's 21125 !

Inan 1125 over there :-

"just received this data ... from Marcus. I won't mention names but ... those with a good memory will recall 23mm.... on going no new mets which is vital if the vaccine can work at earlier stages its generating memory and the cancer is not growing .. wow ! 5 days ago . . . . "

"""Slightly different scenario. Mine had spread to the lungs by the time it was diagnosed, so too late for surgery. Instead I had a 2.5 year treatment of immunotherapy and a trial vaccine for a year. Lung mets are no more and the original tumour has shrunk from 59 to 23 mm. I have regular scans (every 6 months) to monitor the situation. I was there yesterday, in fact! Your youth should work in your favour. I was 52 when diagnosed in Nov 2021. There's lots of treatment options for kidney cancer spread to the lungs. Lots of immunotherapy options usually."""

Inan 21127 "most folks don't understand the significance of no new Mets but its HUGE in the context of metastatic cancer"

You can guess the source of these revelations . . . I did. Interesting indeed.

Thanks Marcus and Inan !