RE: planning update?1 May 2022 22:39
Eloro
In the original plan the stage of moving to NdO to metal was to follow the mine construction and Saltend building facility as a phase 2 development (Back in May 2021 Paul Atherley spoke about it). What has happened last autumn were two key changes. The first was potential supply of hydrogen to the Saltend facility that was not part of the first PP application and the second was that potential funders of this project back in September 2021 changed the rules on ESG to clamp down on green washing and proposed more stringent criteria. The company responded by changing tactics by allowing a growth pathway that incorporated the NdO to metal capability and using hydrogen as a carbon free source at some point at Saltend in a recycling process to comply with the new funding rules. It was clear this was imposed on Pensana by the banks and funding sources on how this sector was to be funded on the carbon transition process. Pensana did not change the rules, but was supportive of its direction and went on to follow them in the hope of attracting favourable financial terms. So Phase 2 has now been embedded in the development to fit with the new ESG rules. The supplier for the hydrogen as an energy source to Pensana is taking over the first Pensana site at Saltend as an addition to their originally PP site that was sitting alongside it as they need that space which is part of a huge development.
In the meantime the shares between the top 20 holders remains as before although around 400,000 shares moved from JIMS to Aurora. The evidence is showing a lot of people are waiting to see what happens. During the delays Pensana has completed FEED and this has ran on longer than they expected and some additional tweaking is on-going and will soon be finished.
Despite all this work, somebody has to agree a finance deal or reject the company requests. We do not know if the deals offered to Pensana were a rip off and were not acceptable to the Pensana Board and the AWF and the Government of Angola or just so complicated that they involve really long negotiations. Quite a few complaints have been made how the financial sector want to over charge the energy transition sector to compensate moving away from oil and other industries. The terms offered might be 100% worse then say if Pensana was an oil company wanting to develop an oil field off the cost of Angola. This is a sector wide issue and the financial sector is possibly failing to aid the delivery of COP26 and why Janet Yellen has been kicking the World Bank this weekend to get on with green ESG energy transition funding along with all the other essential infrastructure as they have just sat on their backside waiting for somebody else to make decisions to date.
Eloro we all know how you feel and what you think, being repetitive becomes pointless and does not change anything.